Yucesoy v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al

Filing 74

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 73 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER to Extend Time to Respond filed by Uber Technologies, Inc., Ryan Graves, Travis Kalanick. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 6/25/15. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/25/2015)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18

GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP
THEODORE J. BOUTROUS, JR., SBN
132099
[e-mail]
DEBRA WONG YANG, SBN 123289
[e-mail]
MARCELLUS A. MCRAE, SBN 140308
[e-mail]
THEANE D. EVANGELIS, SBN 243570
[e-mail]
DHANANJAY S. MANTHRIPRAGADA,
SBN 254433
[e-mail]
333 South Grand Avenue
Los Angeles, CA 90071-3197
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 213.229.7520
GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP
JOSHUA S. LIPSHUTZ, SBN 242557
[e-mail]
KEVIN J. RING-DOWELL, SBN 278289
[e-mail]
555 Mission Street, Suite 3000
San Francisco, CA 94105-0921
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 415.393.8306

SHANNON LISS-RIORDAN, pro hac vice
([e-mail])
ADELAIDE PAGANO, pro hac vice
([e-mail])
LICHTEN & LISS-RIORDAN, P.C.
729 Boylston Street, Suite 2000
Boston, MA 02116
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
MATTHEW CARLSON (SBN 273242)
([e-mail])
CARLSON LEGAL SERVICES
100 Pine Street, Suite 1250
San Francisco, CA 94111
Telephone: [phone]
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
HAKAN YUCESOY and ABDI MAHAMMED

Attorneys for Defendants
UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., TRAVIS
KALANICK, and RYAN GRAVES

19
20

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

21

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

22
23

HAKAN YUCESOY and ABDI
MAHAMMED, individually on behalf of all
others similarly situated,
Plaintiffs,

24
25
26
27

CASE NO. 3:15-cv-00262-EMC
JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER CHANGING TIME TO RESPOND

v.
UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., TRAVIS
KALANICK, and RYAN GRAVES,
Defendants.

28
Gibson, Dunn &
Crutcher LLP

STIP. AND PROPOSED ORDER CHANGING TIME TO RESPOND – CASE NO. 3:15-CV-00262-EMC

1
2

STIPULATION
Plaintiffs Hakan Yucesoy and Abdi Mahammed (“Plaintiffs”) and Defendants Uber

3

Technologies, Inc., Travis Kalanick, and Ryan Graves (“Defendants”) (collectively, the “Parties”), by

4

and through their respective counsel of record, hereby stipulate as follows:

5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13

WHEREAS, on March 31, 2015, Defendants filed a motion to dismiss Plaintiffs’ First
Amended Complaint, see Docket No. 36;
WHEREAS, on June 12, 2015, this Court issued an Order granting in part and denying in part
Defendants’ motion to dismiss Plaintiffs’ First Amended Complaint, see Docket No. 69;
WHEREAS, by the same Order, this Court granted Plaintiffs leave to file a Second Amended
Complaint on or before July 2, 2015, see Docket No. 69;
WHEREAS, the Parties have conferred and Plaintiffs have indicated that they intend to file a
Second Amended Complaint;
WHEREAS, in the absence of an Order by this Court modifying the pleadings schedule,

14

Defendants may be required to file a responsive pleading on or before June 26, 2015, in accordance

15

with Fed. Rule Civ. Pro. 12(a)(4)(A)—a date before the deadline to file a Second Amended

16

Complaint;

17
18
19
20
21
22

NOW THEREFORE, the Parties hereby stipulate, subject to the approval of this Court, to the
following deadline:
•

Defendants must file a responsive pleading no later than thirty (30) days from the date of
filing of the Second Amended Complaint.

IT IS SO STIPULATED

23
24
25
26
27
28
Gibson, Dunn &
Crutcher LLP

2
STIP. AND PROPOSED ORDER CHANGING TIME TO RESPOND – CASE NO. 3:15-CV-00262-EMC

1

Dated: June 24, 2015

GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP

2
3

By:

4

Attorney for Defendants UBER TECHNOLOGIES,
INC., TRAVIS KALANICK, and RYAN GRAVES

5
6

/s/ Theodore J. Boutrous Jr.
Theodore J. Boutrous Jr.

Dated: June 24, 2015

LICHTEN & LISS-RIORDAN, P.C.

7
8

By:

9

/s/ Shannon Liss-Riordan
Shannon Liss-Riordan

Attorney for Plaintiffs HAKAN YUCESOY and
ABDI MAHAMMED

10
11
12
13

[PROPOSED] ORDER

14

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

UNIT
ED

6/25

Dated: _________, 2015

_________________

19

United States District Judge
. Chen
dward M
Judge E

RT

21

ER

H

22
23

FO

NO

20

R NIA

ANTED
GREdward M. Chen
The Honorable

LI

18

S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA

RT
U
O

17

S

16

A

15

N

F
D IS T IC T O
R

C

24
25
26
27
28
Gibson, Dunn &
Crutcher LLP

3
STIP. AND PROPOSED ORDER CHANGING TIME TO RESPOND – CASE NO. 3:15-CV-00262-EMC

1
2
3

ECF ATTESTATION
I hereby attest that I have on file all holographic signatures corresponding to any signatures
indicated by a conformed signature (/s/) within this e-filed document.

4
5
6

By:

/s/
Dhananjay S. Manthripragada

7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Gibson, Dunn &
Crutcher LLP

4
STIP. AND PROPOSED ORDER CHANGING TIME TO RESPOND – CASE NO. 3:15-CV-00262-EMC