Yucesoy v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al
Filing
76
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 75 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER to Extend the Time for Defendants' Reply in Support of Their Motion to Compel Arbitration and to Permit Plaintiffs to File a Brief Supplement in Support of Their Opposition filed by Hakan Yucesoy. Responses due by 7/1/2015. Replies due by 7/8/2015.. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 6/30/15. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/30/2015)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP
THEODORE J. BOUTROUS, JR., SBN 132099
tboutrous@gibsondunn.com
DEBRA WONG YANG, SBN 123289
dwongyang@gibsondunn.com
MARCELLUS A. MCRAE, SBN 140308
mmcrae@gibsondunn.com
THEANE D. EVANGELIS, SBN 243570
tevangelis@gibsondunn.com
DHANANJAY S. MANTHRIPRAGADA,
SBN 254433
dmanthripragada@gibsondunn.com
BRANDON J. STOKER, SBN 277325
bstoker@gibsondunn.com
333 South Grand Avenue
Los Angeles, CA 90071-3197
Telephone:
213.229.7000
Facsimile:
213.229.7520
SHANNON LISS-RIORDAN, pro hac vice
ADELAIDE PAGANO, pro hac vice
LICHTEN & LISS-RIORDAN, P.C.
729 Boylston Street, Suite 2000
Boston, MA 02116
Telephone:
(617) 994-5800
Facsimile:
(617) 994-5801
sliss@llrlaw.com
apagano@llrlaw.com
JOSHUA S. LIPSHUTZ, SBN 242557
jlipshutz@gibsondunn.com
KEVIN J. RING-DOWELL, SBN 278289
kringdowell@gibsondunn.com
555 Mission Street, Suite 3000
San Francisco, CA 94105-0921
Telephone:
415.393.8200
Facsimile:
415.393.8306
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
HAKAN YUCESOY and ABDI MAHAMMED,
individually and on behalf of all others similarly
situated
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
MATTHEW CARLSON, SBN 273242
CARLSON LEGAL SERVICES
100 Pine Street, Suite 1250
San Francisco, CA 94111
Telephone:
(415) 817-1470
mcarlson@carlsonlegalservices.com
Attorneys for Defendant
UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., RYAN
GRAVES, and TRAVIS KALANICK.
17
19
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
CASE NO. 3:15-cv-00262-EMC
HAKAN YUCESOY and ABDI
20
MAHAMMED, individually and on behalf of
all others similarly situated,
18
21
22
23
24
25
26
Plaintiffs,
v.
UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., RYAN
GRAVES, and TRAVIS KALANICK,
Defendant.
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
TO EXTEND THE TIME FOR
DEFENDANTS’ REPLY IN SUPPORT OF
THEIR MOTION TO COMPEL
ARBITRATION AND TO PERMIT
PLAINTIFFS TO FILE A BRIEF
SUPPLEMENT IN SUPPORT OF THEIR
OPPOSITION
Date: August 6, 2015
Time: 1:30 pm
Place: Courtroom 5
Judge: Hon. Edward M. Chen
27
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND THE TIME FOR DEFENDANTS’ REPLY IN SUPPORT
OF THEIR MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION AND TO PERMIT PLAINTIFFS TO FILE A BRIEF
SUPPLEMENT IN SUPPORT OF THEIR OPPOSITON
1
2
Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-12, the undersigned counsel of record for Plaintiffs Hakan
3
Yucesoy and Abdi Mahammed (“Plaintiffs”) and Defendants Uber Technologies, Inc., Ryan Graves,
4
and Travis Kalanick, (“Defendants”),(collectively, the “Parties”) stipulate and agree that the date for
5
Defendants to file their reply in support of Defendants’ Motion to Compel Arbitration currently
6
scheduled for June 30, 2015, be moved to July 8, 2015, and that Plaintiffs be permitted to file a brief
7
supplement to their Opposition to Defendants’ Motion to Compel Arbitration no later than July 1,
8
2015:
9
10
WHEREAS, the hearing on Defendants’ Motion to Compel Arbitration is currently scheduled
for August 6, 2015;
11
12
WHEREAS, Plaintiffs plan to seek leave to file a brief supplement to their Opposition to
Defendants’ Motion to Compel Arbitration (Doc. 72) by July 1, 2015;
13
WHEREAS, this supplement will further clarify and lend support to Plaintiffs’ argument and
14
will aid the Court in its consideration of Defendants’ Motion;
15
WHEREAS, the Court and parties will not be prejudiced by a brief delay in the filing of
16
17
Defendants’ Reply Memorandum until July 8, 2015;
18
WHEREAS, this extra time will permit Defendants to respond to the brief supplement that
19
Plaintiffs plan to submit in support of their Opposition to Defendants’ Motion to Compel Arbitration
20
(Doc. 72) by July 1, 2015;
21
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, subject to the Court’s approval, that:
22
(1)
23
currently set for June 30, 2015, be moved to July 8, 2015;
24
(2)
25
26
The due date for Defendants’ Reply in Support of their Motion to Compel Arbitration
Plaintiffs be permitted to submit an Administrative Motion to Supplement their
Opposition Brief (Doc. 72) no later than July 1, 2015.
///
27
28
2
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND THE TIME FOR DEFENDANTS’ REPLY IN SUPPORT
OF THEIR MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION AND TO PERMIT PLAINTIFFS TO FILE A BRIEF
SUPPLEMENT IN SUPPORT OF THEIR OPPOSITON
1
2
In accordance with Local Rule 5-1, the filer of this document hereby attests that the
concurrence to the filing of this document has been obtained from the other signatories hereto.
3
4
Dated: June 29, 2015
5
SHANNON LISS-RIORDAN
ADELAIDE PAGANO
LICHTEN & LISS-RIORDAN, P.C.
6
MATTHEW CARLSON
CARLSON LEGAL SERVICES
7
8
By:
9
/s/ Shannon Liss-Riordan
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
HAKAN YUCESOY AND ABDI MAHAMMED,
individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
Dated: June 29, 2015
THEODORE J. BOUTROUS, JR.
DEBRA WONG YANG
MARCELLUS A. MCRAE
THEANE D. EVANGELIS
JOSHUA S. LIPSHUTZ
DHANANJAY S. MANTHRIPRAGADA
BRANDON J. STOKER
KEVIN J. RING-DOWELL
GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP
19
By: /s/ Theodore J. Boutrous, Jr.
20
Attorneys for Defendant
UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., RYAN GRAVES, and
TRAVIS KALANICK
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND THE TIME FOR DEFENDANTS’ REPLY IN SUPPORT
OF THEIR MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION AND TO PERMIT PLAINTIFFS TO FILE A BRIEF
SUPPLEMENT IN SUPPORT OF THEIR OPPOSITON
RT
7
ER
9
n
M. Che
A
H
8
R NIA
dward
Judge E
NO
6
D
RDERE
OO
IT IS S
FO
5
Hon. Edward M. Chen
LI
4
S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
RT
U
O
3
6/30/15
Date: ____________________
S
2
PURSUANT TO THIS STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
UNIT
ED
1
N
D IS T IC T
R
OF
C
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
4
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND THE TIME FOR DEFENDANTS’ REPLY IN SUPPORT
OF THEIR MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION AND TO PERMIT PLAINTIFFS TO FILE A BRIEF
SUPPLEMENT IN SUPPORT OF THEIR OPPOSITON
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?