Yucesoy v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al

Filing 76

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 75 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER to Extend the Time for Defendants' Reply in Support of Their Motion to Compel Arbitration and to Permit Plaintiffs to File a Brief Supplement in Support of Their Opposition filed by Hakan Yucesoy. Responses due by 7/1/2015. Replies due by 7/8/2015.. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 6/30/15. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/30/2015)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP THEODORE J. BOUTROUS, JR., SBN 132099 tboutrous@gibsondunn.com DEBRA WONG YANG, SBN 123289 dwongyang@gibsondunn.com MARCELLUS A. MCRAE, SBN 140308 mmcrae@gibsondunn.com THEANE D. EVANGELIS, SBN 243570 tevangelis@gibsondunn.com DHANANJAY S. MANTHRIPRAGADA, SBN 254433 dmanthripragada@gibsondunn.com BRANDON J. STOKER, SBN 277325 bstoker@gibsondunn.com 333 South Grand Avenue Los Angeles, CA 90071-3197 Telephone: 213.229.7000 Facsimile: 213.229.7520 SHANNON LISS-RIORDAN, pro hac vice ADELAIDE PAGANO, pro hac vice LICHTEN & LISS-RIORDAN, P.C. 729 Boylston Street, Suite 2000 Boston, MA 02116 Telephone: (617) 994-5800 Facsimile: (617) 994-5801 sliss@llrlaw.com apagano@llrlaw.com JOSHUA S. LIPSHUTZ, SBN 242557 jlipshutz@gibsondunn.com KEVIN J. RING-DOWELL, SBN 278289 kringdowell@gibsondunn.com 555 Mission Street, Suite 3000 San Francisco, CA 94105-0921 Telephone: 415.393.8200 Facsimile: 415.393.8306 Attorneys for Plaintiffs HAKAN YUCESOY and ABDI MAHAMMED, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 MATTHEW CARLSON, SBN 273242 CARLSON LEGAL SERVICES 100 Pine Street, Suite 1250 San Francisco, CA 94111 Telephone: (415) 817-1470 mcarlson@carlsonlegalservices.com Attorneys for Defendant UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., RYAN GRAVES, and TRAVIS KALANICK. 17 19 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CASE NO. 3:15-cv-00262-EMC HAKAN YUCESOY and ABDI 20 MAHAMMED, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, 18 21 22 23 24 25 26 Plaintiffs, v. UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., RYAN GRAVES, and TRAVIS KALANICK, Defendant. STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND THE TIME FOR DEFENDANTS’ REPLY IN SUPPORT OF THEIR MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION AND TO PERMIT PLAINTIFFS TO FILE A BRIEF SUPPLEMENT IN SUPPORT OF THEIR OPPOSITION Date: August 6, 2015 Time: 1:30 pm Place: Courtroom 5 Judge: Hon. Edward M. Chen 27 28 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND THE TIME FOR DEFENDANTS’ REPLY IN SUPPORT OF THEIR MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION AND TO PERMIT PLAINTIFFS TO FILE A BRIEF SUPPLEMENT IN SUPPORT OF THEIR OPPOSITON 1 2 Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-12, the undersigned counsel of record for Plaintiffs Hakan 3 Yucesoy and Abdi Mahammed (“Plaintiffs”) and Defendants Uber Technologies, Inc., Ryan Graves, 4 and Travis Kalanick, (“Defendants”),(collectively, the “Parties”) stipulate and agree that the date for 5 Defendants to file their reply in support of Defendants’ Motion to Compel Arbitration currently 6 scheduled for June 30, 2015, be moved to July 8, 2015, and that Plaintiffs be permitted to file a brief 7 supplement to their Opposition to Defendants’ Motion to Compel Arbitration no later than July 1, 8 2015: 9 10 WHEREAS, the hearing on Defendants’ Motion to Compel Arbitration is currently scheduled for August 6, 2015; 11 12 WHEREAS, Plaintiffs plan to seek leave to file a brief supplement to their Opposition to Defendants’ Motion to Compel Arbitration (Doc. 72) by July 1, 2015; 13 WHEREAS, this supplement will further clarify and lend support to Plaintiffs’ argument and 14 will aid the Court in its consideration of Defendants’ Motion; 15 WHEREAS, the Court and parties will not be prejudiced by a brief delay in the filing of 16 17 Defendants’ Reply Memorandum until July 8, 2015; 18 WHEREAS, this extra time will permit Defendants to respond to the brief supplement that 19 Plaintiffs plan to submit in support of their Opposition to Defendants’ Motion to Compel Arbitration 20 (Doc. 72) by July 1, 2015; 21 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, subject to the Court’s approval, that: 22 (1) 23 currently set for June 30, 2015, be moved to July 8, 2015; 24 (2) 25 26 The due date for Defendants’ Reply in Support of their Motion to Compel Arbitration Plaintiffs be permitted to submit an Administrative Motion to Supplement their Opposition Brief (Doc. 72) no later than July 1, 2015. /// 27 28 2 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND THE TIME FOR DEFENDANTS’ REPLY IN SUPPORT OF THEIR MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION AND TO PERMIT PLAINTIFFS TO FILE A BRIEF SUPPLEMENT IN SUPPORT OF THEIR OPPOSITON 1 2 In accordance with Local Rule 5-1, the filer of this document hereby attests that the concurrence to the filing of this document has been obtained from the other signatories hereto. 3 4 Dated: June 29, 2015 5 SHANNON LISS-RIORDAN ADELAIDE PAGANO LICHTEN & LISS-RIORDAN, P.C. 6 MATTHEW CARLSON CARLSON LEGAL SERVICES 7 8 By: 9 /s/ Shannon Liss-Riordan Attorneys for Plaintiffs HAKAN YUCESOY AND ABDI MAHAMMED, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 Dated: June 29, 2015 THEODORE J. BOUTROUS, JR. DEBRA WONG YANG MARCELLUS A. MCRAE THEANE D. EVANGELIS JOSHUA S. LIPSHUTZ DHANANJAY S. MANTHRIPRAGADA BRANDON J. STOKER KEVIN J. RING-DOWELL GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP 19 By: /s/ Theodore J. Boutrous, Jr. 20 Attorneys for Defendant UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., RYAN GRAVES, and TRAVIS KALANICK 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND THE TIME FOR DEFENDANTS’ REPLY IN SUPPORT OF THEIR MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION AND TO PERMIT PLAINTIFFS TO FILE A BRIEF SUPPLEMENT IN SUPPORT OF THEIR OPPOSITON RT 7 ER 9 n M. Che A H 8 R NIA dward Judge E NO 6 D RDERE OO IT IS S FO 5 Hon. Edward M. Chen LI 4 S DISTRICT TE C TA RT U O 3 6/30/15 Date: ____________________ S 2 PURSUANT TO THIS STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. UNIT ED 1 N D IS T IC T R OF C 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 4 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND THE TIME FOR DEFENDANTS’ REPLY IN SUPPORT OF THEIR MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION AND TO PERMIT PLAINTIFFS TO FILE A BRIEF SUPPLEMENT IN SUPPORT OF THEIR OPPOSITON 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?