Yucesoy v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al

Filing 89

ORAL ARGUMENT PREPARATION ORDER. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 7/29/15. (emclc1S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/29/2015)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 8 HAKAN YUCESOY, et al., 9 Plaintiffs, 10 ORAL ARGUMENT PREPARATION ORDER v. 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court No. C15-0262 EMC UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., et al., 12 Defendants. ___________________________________/ 13 14 15 On August 6, 2015, this Court will hear oral argument on Uber’s pending motion to compel 16 arbitration of Plaintiffs’ claims in this matter. Docket No. 62. In its motion and supporting papers, 17 Uber contends that Plaintiff Hakan Yucesoy assented to be bound to an agreement containing the 18 arbitration clause at issue. Yucesoy claims in declarations and supporting documents that he did 19 not so assent, was out of the United States at the time that Uber claims he agreed to be bound, and 20 that another individual apparently drove “under [his] account without authorization.” See, e.g., 21 Docket No. 88. Thus, it appears that there may be a material factual dispute regarding contract 22 formation. 23 At the hearing on August 6, 2015, the parties are directed to be prepared to discuss their 24 respective positions as to whether there is a material factual dispute regarding contract formation, 25 and, if so, 26 /// 27 /// 28 /// 1 what the appropriate course of action should be. See generally 9 U.S.C. § 4 (“If the making of the 2 arbitration agreement . . . be in issue, the court shall proceed summarily to the trial thereof.”); 3 Howard v. Ferrellgas Partners, L.P., 748 F.3d 975 (10th Cir. 2014); Nebraska Machinery Co. v. 4 Cargotec Solutions, LLC, 762 F.3d 737 (8th Cir. 2014). 5 6 IT IS SO ORDERED. 7 8 Dated: July 29, 2015 9 _________________________ EDWARD M. CHEN United States District Judge 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?