Yucesoy v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al
Filing
89
ORAL ARGUMENT PREPARATION ORDER. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 7/29/15. (emclc1S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/29/2015)
1
2
3
4
5
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
6
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
7
8
HAKAN YUCESOY, et al.,
9
Plaintiffs,
10
ORAL ARGUMENT PREPARATION
ORDER
v.
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
No. C15-0262 EMC
UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., et al.,
12
Defendants.
___________________________________/
13
14
15
On August 6, 2015, this Court will hear oral argument on Uber’s pending motion to compel
16
arbitration of Plaintiffs’ claims in this matter. Docket No. 62. In its motion and supporting papers,
17
Uber contends that Plaintiff Hakan Yucesoy assented to be bound to an agreement containing the
18
arbitration clause at issue. Yucesoy claims in declarations and supporting documents that he did
19
not so assent, was out of the United States at the time that Uber claims he agreed to be bound, and
20
that another individual apparently drove “under [his] account without authorization.” See, e.g.,
21
Docket No. 88. Thus, it appears that there may be a material factual dispute regarding contract
22
formation.
23
At the hearing on August 6, 2015, the parties are directed to be prepared to discuss their
24
respective positions as to whether there is a material factual dispute regarding contract formation,
25
and, if so,
26
///
27
///
28
///
1
what the appropriate course of action should be. See generally 9 U.S.C. § 4 (“If the making of the
2
arbitration agreement . . . be in issue, the court shall proceed summarily to the trial thereof.”);
3
Howard v. Ferrellgas Partners, L.P., 748 F.3d 975 (10th Cir. 2014); Nebraska Machinery Co. v.
4
Cargotec Solutions, LLC, 762 F.3d 737 (8th Cir. 2014).
5
6
IT IS SO ORDERED.
7
8
Dated: July 29, 2015
9
_________________________
EDWARD M. CHEN
United States District Judge
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?