Burke et al v. Brentwood Union School District et al

Filing 168

STIPULATION AND ORDER 166 : Motion Hearing reset for 3/14/2017 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom E, 15th Floor, San Francisco before Magistrate Judge Elizabeth D. Laporte. Plaintiffs' supplemental opposition due 2/10/2017; defendants' supplemental reply brief due 2/23/2017. Signed by Judge Elizabeth D. Laporte on 1/17/2017. (afmS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/17/2017)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 PETER W. ALFERT, SBN 83139 IAN HANSEN, SBN 255449 LAW OFFICES OF PETER ALFERT, PC 200 Pringle Ave., Suite 450 Walnut Creek, California 94596 Telephone: (925) 279-3009 Facsimile: (925) 279-3342 8 TODD BOLEY, SBN 64119 ZOYA YARNYKH, SBN 258062 LAW OFFICE OF TODD BOLEY 2831 Mariner Square Dr., Suite 280 Alameda, CA 94501 Telephone: (510) 836-4500 Facsimile: (510) 649-5170 9 Attorneys for PLAINTIFFS 6 7 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 11 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 12 13 NATALIE BURKE and M.B., a minor by and through her guardian ad litem NATALIE BURKE, No. 3:15-cv-00286 EDL STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 14 15 16 17 Plaintiffs, v. BRENTWOOD UNION SCHOOL DISTRICT, MATTHEW DAILEY, KELLY MANKE, JENNIFER WHITNEY, DANA EATON, and DOES 1-30, Before Hon. Elizabeth D. Laporte TRIAL: May 30, 2017 18 Defendants. 19 20 The parties to the above captioned action hereby stipulate by and through their undersigned 21 counsel of record as follows: 22 WHEREAS, on November 22, 2016, the Court entered an Order (Docket 161) modifying the 23 schedule surrounding defendants Motion for Summary Judgment setting the deadline for Plaintiffs’ 24 to file their Supplemental Opposition to Defendants’Motion on January 31, 2017, setting the 25 deadline for Defendants to file their Supplemental Reply Brief on February 14, 2017 and setting 26 the hearing on Defendants Motion for Summary Judgment on February 28, 2017; and 27 WHEREAS, after this briefing schedule was set, between December 6, 2016 and January 17, 28 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER -1- 3:15-cv-00286 EDL 1 2017, defendant, Brentwood Union School District has produced approximately 20,170 pages of 2 additional ESI to plaintiffs; and 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 WHEREAS, the parties continue to meet and confer regarding additional issues relating to the production of responsive ESI; IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between Plaintiffs and Defendants, by and through their respective counsel, that: 1. The parties respectfully request that the Court continue the following deadlines as set forth herein: a. Plaintiffs’Supplemental Opposition to Defendants’Motion for Summary 10 10 Judgment shall be filed on February 14, 2017. 23 11 b. Defendants’Supplemental Reply Brief shall be filed on February 28, 2017. 12 c. The hearing on Defendants’Motion for Summary Judgment shall be continued 13 14 to March 14, 2017. Date: January 17, 2017 15 Peter W. Alfert /s/ PETER W. ALFERT Attorney for PLAINTIFFS 16 17 LAW OFFICES OF PETER ALFERT, P.C. Date: January 17, 2017 EDRINGTON, SHIRMER & MURPHY LLP 18 Dolores Donohoe /s/ TIMOTHY MURPHY DOLORES M. DONOHOE Attorney for Defendant BRENTWOOD UNION SCHOOL DISTRICT 19 20 21 22 23 Date: January 17, 2017 24 LEONE & ALBERTS Louis Leone /s/ LOUIS LEONE CLAUDIA LEED Attorney for Defendants MATTHEW DAILEY, KELLY MANKE, JENNIFER WHTNEY and DANA EATON 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER -2- 3:15-cv-00286 EDL 1 ORDER AS MODIFIED 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 THE PARTIES HAVING STIPULATED THERETO AND GOOD CAUSE APPEARING THEREFORE, it is hereby ordered that: 1. The hearing on defendants’Motion for Summary Judgment be continued to March 14, 2017; 2. Plaintiffs’Supplemental Opposition to the motion for summary judgment shall be filed on February 14, 2017; and by 9:00 a.m. on February 10, 2017; and 3. Defendants’Supplemental Reply to motion for summary judgment shall be filed on February 28, 2017. by 9:00 a.m. on February 23, 2017. 11 12 DATE: January 17, 2017 U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE ELIZABETH D. LAPORTE 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER -3- 3:15-cv-00286 EDL

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?