Newett v. Leapfrog Enterprises, Inc. et al

Filing 96

STIPULATION AND SCHEDULING ORDER re 95 filed by KBC Asset Management NV. Motion to Dismiss Hearing set for 2/2/2017 01:30 PM in Courtroom 5, 17th Floor, San Francisco before Edward M. Chen. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 9/2/16. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/2/2016)

Download PDF
1 ROBBINS GELLER RUDMAN & DOWD LLP 2 SHAWN A. WILLIAMS (213113) WILLOW E. RADCLIFFE (200087) 3 MATTHEW S. MELAMED (260272) Post Montgomery Center 4 One Montgomery Street, Suite 1800 San Francisco, CA 94104 5 Telephone: 415/288-4545 415/288-4534 (fax) 6 shawnw@rgrdlaw.com willowr@rgrdlaw.com 7 mmelamed@rgrdlaw.com 8 MOTLEY RICE LLC JAMES M. HUGHES (pro hac vice) 9 WILLIAM S. NORTON CHRISTOPHER F. MORIARTY 10 28 Bridgeside Blvd. Mount Pleasant, SC 29464 11 Telephone: 843/216-9000 843/216-9450 (fax) 12 jhughes@motleyrice.com bnorton@motleyrice.com 13 cmoriarty@motleyrice.com 14 Co-Lead Counsel for Plaintiffs 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 16 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 17 In re LEAPFROG ENTERPRISES, INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION 18 19 This Document Relates To: 20 ALL ACTIONS. 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1182428_1 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Master File No. 3:15-cv-00347-EMC CLASS ACTION STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] SCHEDULING ORDER 1 Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-12, the parties – lead plaintiff KBC Asset Management NV 2 (“Lead Plaintiff”) and defendants LeapFrog Enterprises, Inc., John Barbour, and Raymond L. Arthur 3 (“Defendants”) – by and through their undersigned counsel of record, submit the following 4 stipulation and proposed order: 5 WHEREAS, on May 26, 2015, the Court previously granted the parties’ stipulated request to 6 continue the scheduled case management conference from September 24, 2015 to October 8, 2015 7 (Dkt. No. 49); 8 WHEREAS, on November 9, 2015, the Court previously granted the parties’ stipulated 9 request to continue the scheduled case management conference from January 14, 2016 to March 24, 10 2016, and entered the proposed schedule for Lead Plaintiff to file an amended complaint and a 11 briefing schedule for Defendants anticipated motion to dismiss (Dkt. No. 69); 12 WHEREAS, on December 4, 2015, Lead Plaintiff filed the First Amended Consolidated 13 Class Action Complaint for Violation of the Federal Securities Laws against Defendants 14 (“Complaint”) (Dkt. No. 70); 15 WHEREAS, on January 15, 2016, Defendants moved to dismiss the Complaint (Dkt. No. 16 72); 17 WHEREAS, on August 2, 2016, the Court entered an Order Granting Defendants’ Motion to 18 Dismiss (“MTD Order”) and permitting Lead Plaintiff to file a second amended complaint within 30 19 days (Dkt. No. 88); 20 WHEREAS, on August 19, 2016, Lead Plaintiff filed Lead Plaintiff’s Notice of Motion and 21 Motion for Leave to File a Motion for Reconsideration concerning certain aspects of the MTD Order 22 (Dkt. No. 90); 23 WHEREAS, on August 31, 2016, the Court entered an Order Denying Plaintiffs’ Motion for 24 Leave to File a Motion for Reconsideration (“Reconsideration Order”), in which it stated that 25 reconsideration at this time “would not comport with ‘conservation of judicial resources’” in light of 26 the anticipated second amended complaint and ability to address the issues Lead Plaintiff raised in 27 the anticipated next round of motion to dismiss briefing (Dkt. No. 93); 28 1182428_1 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] SCHEDULING ORDER - 3:15-cv-00347-EMC -1- 1 WHEREAS, the second amended complaint must be filed within 30 days of the MTD Order 2 (Dkt. No. 88); 3 WHEREAS, Lead Plaintiff requests time to analyze the Reconsideration Order; and 4 WHEREAS, the parties have met and conferred and have agreed to a schedule whereby: 5 1. If Lead Plaintiff decides to file a second amended complaint, it shall do so no later 6 than September 20, 2016; 7 2. Defendants’ motion to dismiss a second amended complaint shall be due on or before 8 November 4, 2016, and shall be noticed for hearing on February 2, 2017; 9 3. Lead Plaintiff’s opposition to Defendants’ motion to dismiss shall be due on 10 December 19, 2016; and 11 4. Defendants’ reply in support of their motion to dismiss shall be due on January 20, 12 2017. 13 NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereby agree and stipulate that: 14 1. Lead Plaintiff shall have until September 20, 2016 to file a second amended 15 complaint; 16 2. Defendants’ motion to dismiss a second amended complaint shall be due on or before 17 November 4, 2016, and shall be noticed for hearing on February 2, 2017; 18 3. Lead Plaintiff’s opposition to Defendants’ motion to dismiss shall be due on 19 December 19, 2016; and 20 4. 19 Defendants’ reply in support of their motion to dismiss shall be due on January 20, 21 2017. 22 DATED: September 1, 2016 23 24 ROBBINS GELLER RUDMAN & DOWD LLP SHAWN A. WILLIAMS WILLOW E. RADCLIFFE MATTHEW S. MELAMED 25 26 s/ Matthew S.Melamed MATTHEW S. MELAMED 27 28 1182428_1 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] SCHEDULING ORDER - 3:15-cv-00347-EMC -2- 1 Post Montgomery Center One Montgomery Street, Suite 1800 San Francisco, CA 94104 Telephone: 415/288-4545 415/288-4534 (fax) 2 3 4 8 MOTLEY RICE LLC JAMES M. HUGHES WILLIAM S. NORTON CHRISTOPHER F. MORIARTY 28 Bridgeside Blvd. Mount Pleasant, SC 29464 Telephone: 843/216-9000 843/216-9450 (fax) 9 Co-Lead Counsel for Plaintiffs 5 6 7 10 DATED: September 1, 2016 MORRISON & FOERSTER JORDAN ETH MARK R.S. FOSTER 11 12 13 s/ Mark R.S. Foster MARK R.S. FOSTER 14 425 Market Street San Francisco, CA 94105-2482 Telephone: 415/268-7000 416/268-7522 (fax) 15 16 17 20 I, Matthew S. Melamed, am the ECF User whose ID and password are being used to file this Stipulation and [Proposed] Scheduling Order. In compliance with Civil Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), I hereby attest that Mark R.S. Foster has concurred in this filing. 21 s/ Matthew S.Melamed MATTHEW S. MELAMED 22 * ____________________________________ THE HONORABLE EDWARD M. CHEN UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE ED ORDER IT IS SO DIFIED AS MO . Chen NO ward M Judge Ed ER A H 1182428_1 RT 28 LI DATED: _________________________ 9/2/2016 S DISTRICT TE C TA RT U O 27 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. (as modified on p. 2, line 20) S 26 * ORDER 24 25 * UNIT ED 23 R NIA 19 FO 18 Attorneys for Defendants N F D IS T IC T O R C STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] SCHEDULING ORDER - 3:15-cv-00347-EMC -3- 1 2 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that on September 1, 2016, I authorized the electronic filing of the foregoing 3 with the Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF system which will send notification of such filing to 4 the e-mail addresses denoted on the attached Electronic Mail Notice List, and I hereby certify that I 5 caused to be mailed the foregoing document or paper via the United States Postal Service to the non6 CM/ECF participants indicated on the attached Manual Notice List. 7 I certify under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that the 8 foregoing is true and correct. Executed on September 1, 2016. 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1182428_1 s/ Matthew S. Melamed MATTHEW S. MELAMED ROBBINS GELLER RUDMAN & DOWD LLP Post Montgomery Center One Montgomery Street, Suite 1800 San Francisco, CA 94104 Telephone: 415/288-4545 415/288-4534 (fax) E-mail: mmelamed@rgrdlaw.com CAND-ECF- Page 1 of 1 Mailing Information for a Case 3:15-cv-00347-EMC In Re: LeapFrog Enterprise, Inc. Securities Litigation Electronic Mail Notice List The following are those who are currently on the list to receive e-mail notices for this case. • Ramzi Abadou ramzi.abadou@ksfcounsel.com,dawn.hartman@ksfcounsel.com • Jordan Eth jeth@mofo.com,gmartinez@mofo.com,jrahman@mofo.com • Mark R.S. Foster mfoster@mofo.com,lroiz@mofo.com,kmaccardle@mofo.com,rbarajas@mofo.com • James Michael Hughes jhughes@motleyrice.com,erichards@motleyrice.com,kweil@motleyrice.com • Jeremy A Lieberman jalieberman@pomlaw.com,disaacson@pomlaw.com,lpvega@pomlaw.com • Matthew Seth Melamed mmelamed@rgrdlaw.com,e_file_SF@rgrdlaw.com,e_file_SD@rgrdlaw.com • Brian O. O'Mara bo'mara@rgrdlaw.com,e_file_sd@rgrdlaw.com,e_file_sf@rgrdlaw.com • Robert Vincent Prongay rprongay@glancylaw.com,info@glancylaw.com,echang@glancylaw.com,bmurray@glancylaw.com • Willow E. Radcliffe willowr@rgrdlaw.com,ptiffith@rgrdlaw.com,mmelamed@rgrdlaw.com,katerinap@rgrdlaw.com,e_file_sd@rgrdlaw.com,e_file_sf@rgrdlaw.com • Shawn A. Williams shawnw@rgrdlaw.com,e_file_sd@rgrdlaw.com,e_file_sf@rgrdlaw.com Manual Notice List The following is the list of attorneys who are not on the list to receive e-mail notices for this case (who therefore require manual noticing). You may wish to use your mouse to select and copy this list into your word processing program in order to create notices or labels for these recipients. • (No manual recipients) https://ecf.cand.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/MailList.pl?689663438208172-L_1_0-1 8/31/2016

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?