Barich v. City of Cotati et al

Filing 21

Order by Hon. Vince Chhabria granting 20 Stipulation selecting Early Neutral Evaluation.(knm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/31/2015)

1
2
3
4
5

CARLETON L. BRIGGS, SBN 117361
Law Offices of Carleton L. Briggs
740 Fourth Street, Suite 202
Santa Rosa, CA 95404-4421
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
E-mail: [e-mail]
Attorneys for Plaintiff
George Barich

6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

GEORGE BARICH,

12
13
14
15

Plaintiff,

Case No. 3:15-cv-00350-VC
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS

vs.
CITY OF COTATI, and
MICHAEL PARISH,
Defendants.

16
17
18

Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached

19

the following stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5:

20

The parties agree to participate in the following ADR process:

21

Court Processes:

22

9

Non-binding Arbitration (ADR L.R. 4)

23

X

Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) (ADR L.R. 5)

24

9

Mediation (ADR L.R. 6)

25

(Note: Parties who believe that an early settlement conference with a Magistrate Judge is

26

appreciably more likely to meet their needs than any other form of ADR must participate

27

in an ADR phone conference and may not file this form. They must instead file a Notice

28

1
Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Selecting ADR Process

1

of Need for ADR Phone Conference. See Civil Local Rule 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5)

2

Private Process:

3

9

4

Private ADR (please identify process and provider)
______________________

5
6

________________________________________________________________________

7
8
9

The parties agree to hold the ADR session by:
X

10
11
12

the presumptive deadline (The deadline is 90 days from the date of the order
referring the case to an ADR process unless otherwise ordered.)

9

other requested deadline
_____________________________________________

13
14

Dated: July 28, 2015

Law Offices of Carleton L. Briggs

15
16

By /s/ Carleton L. Briggs
_
CARLETON L. BRIGGS

17

Attorneys for Plaintiff
GEORGE BARICH

18
19
20

Dated: July 28, 2015

GEARY, SHEA, O'DONNELL,
GRATTAN & MITCHELL, P.C.

21
22

By /s/ Robert W. Henkels
ROBERT W. HENKELS

23
24

Attorneys for Defendants
CITY OF COTATI and MICHAEL
PARISH

25
26

CONTINUE TO FOLLOWING PAGE

27
28

2
Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Selecting ADR Process

[PROPOSED] ORDER

1
2
3

XX
9 The parties’ stipulation is adopted and IT IS SO ORDERED.

4

9

The parties’ stipulation is modified as follows, and IT IS SO ORDERED.

5
6

S

13

ER

in

FO

J u d ge V

A

H

12

__________________________________
UNITED STATES JUDGEabr ia
ce Chh

RT

11

Dated: July 31, 2015

NO

10

LI

9

DERED

O OR
IT IS S

R NIA

UNIT
ED

8

RT
U
O

7

S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA

N

F
D IS T IC T O
R

C

14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

3
Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Selecting ADR Process