Sabatino v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al
Filing
33
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 32 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER MODIFYING BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO STAY PROCEEDINGS PENDING ARBITRATION filed by Rasier, LLC, Uber Technologies, Inc., Rasier-CA, LLC, RASIER-DC, LLC, Rasier-PA, LLC. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on April 1, 2015. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/1/2015)
1 IRELL & MANELLA LLP
Andra Barmash Greene (123931)
2 agreene@irell.com
A. Matthew Ashley (198235)
3 mashley@irell.com
Justin N. Owens (254733)
4 jowens@irell.com
840 Newport Center Drive, Suite 400
5 Newport Beach, California 92660-6324
Telephone: (949) 760-0991
6 Facsimile: (949) 760-5200
7 Attorneys for Defendants
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
)
11 JACOB SABATINO, individually, and on
behalf of all others similarly situated,
)
)
12
Plaintiff,
)
)
13
vs.
)
)
14
UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., a Delaware )
)
15 corporation; RASIER, LLC, a Delaware
limited liability company; RASIER-CA, LLC, )
)
16 a Delaware limited liability company;
RASIER-DC, LLC, a Delaware limited
)
liability company; RASIER-PA, LLC, a
)
17
Delaware limited liability company; and DOES )
)
18 1 to 25, inclusive,
)
Defendants.
)
19
)
20
Case No. 3:15-cv-00363-JST
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER MODIFYING THE BRIEFING
SCHEDULE RE: DEFENDANTS’
MOTION TO STAY PROCEEDINGS
PENDING ARBITRATION (DKT. NO. 27)
Action Filed: January 26, 2015
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3335127
ST IP. AND PROPOSED ORDER MODIFYING BRIEFING SCHEDULE
Case No. 3:15-cv-00363-JST
Plaintiff Jacob Sabatino ("Plaintiff"), and Defendants Uber Technologies, Inc., Rasier,
1
2 LLC, Rasier-CA, LLC, Rasier-DC, LLC, and Rasier-PA, LLC ("Defendants"), by and through
3 their undersigned counsel, enter into the following stipulation pursuant to Local Rule 6-2 and
4 subject to the Court’s approval for an order modifying the briefing schedule on Defendants’
5 Motion to Stay Proceedings Pending Arbitration (Dkt. No. 27). The parties have stipulated to a
6 modified briefing schedule permitting Plaintiff thirty (30) days to file his opposition papers, and
7 permitting Defendants ten (10) days to file reply papers. Given the currently scheduled hearing
8 date of May 21, 2015, these modifications will not require any change to the hearing date or to any
9 other Court deadline. In support of the instant stipulation, the Parties state as follows:
WHEREAS, on January 26, 2015, Plaintiff filed his putative class action complaint against
10
11 Defendants (Dkt. No. 1);
WHEREAS, on February 18, 2015, the Court ordered this case related to Philliben v. Uber
12
13 Technologies, Inc., et al. (United States District Court, Northern District of California, San
14 Francisco Division, Case No. 3:14-cv-05615-JST) and Pappey v. Uber Technologies, Inc. (United
15 States District Court, Northern District of California, San Francisco Division, Case No. 3:15-cv16 00064-JST) (Dkt. No. 23 in Case No. 3:14-cv-05615-JST);
WHEREAS, the Parties previously stipulated that if Defendants’ responsive pleading was
17
18 a motion of any kind, the Parties would agree to a mutually convenient briefing schedule (Dkt. No.
19 26);
WHEREAS, on March 23, 2015, Defendants filed their Motion to Stay Proceedings
20
21 Pending Arbitration, with a hearing date of May 21, 2015 (Dkt. No. 27);
WHEREAS, for the reasons set forth herein, good cause exists to modify the briefing
22
23 scheduled as requested herein;
NOW, THEREFORE, IN CONSIDERATION OF THE FOREGOING, IT IS HEREBY
24
25 STIPULATED by and between the Parties that, subject to Court approval, Plaintiff’s opposition to
26 Defendants’ Motion to Stay Proceedings Pending Arbitration will be due on April 22, 2015, and
27 Defendants’ reply thereto will be due on May 4, 2015.
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
28
3335127
ST IP. AND PROPOSED ORDER MODIFYING BRIEFING SCHEDULE
Case No. 3:15-cv-00363-JST
1 Dated: March 31, 2015
IRELL & MANELLA LLP
2
3
By: /s/ A. Matthew Ashley
Andra B. Greene
A. Matthew Ashley
Justin N. Owens
Attorneys for Defendant
4
5
6
7 Dated: March 31, 2015
MLG AUTOMOTIVE GROUP, APLC
8
9
By: /s/ Kathryn Harvey
Kathryn Harvey
Attorneys for Plaintiff
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-33335127
ST IP. AND PROPOSED ORDER MODIFYING BRIEFING SCHEDULE
Case No. 3:15-cv-00363-JST
1 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, THE COURT ORDERS AS FOLLOWS:
2
The briefing schedule on Defendants’ Motion to Stay Proceedings Pending Arbitration
3 (Dkt. No. 27), for which a hearing is currently scheduled for May 21, 2015, is modified as
4 follows: Plaintiff’s opposition to Defendants’ Motion to Stay Proceedings Pending Arbitration
5 shall be due on April 22, 2015, and Defendants’ reply brief shall be due on May 4, 2015.
6
S
DERED
SO OR
SJon S. Tigar
Honorable
IT I
R NIA
April 1, 2015
Dated: ________________________
United States District Judge
NO
11
RT
12
n
J u d ge J o
13
14
A
H
ER
S . Ti ga r
N
F
D IS T IC T O
R
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-43335127
FO
10
LI
9
UNIT
ED
8
RT
U
O
7
S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
ST IP. AND PROPOSED ORDER MODIFYING BRIEFING SCHEDULE
Case No. 3:15-cv-00363-JST
C
ECF ATTESTATION
1
I, Justin N. Owens, am the ECF user whose ID and password are being used to file this
2
3 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER MODIFYING THE BRIEFING SCHEDULE RE:
4 DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO STAY PROCEEDINGS PENDING ARBITRATION (DKT. NO.
5 27). I hereby attest that I received authorization to insert the signatures indicated by a conformed
6 signature (/s/) within this e-filed document.
By:
7
/s/ Justin N. Owens
Justin N. Owens
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-53335127
ST IP. AND PROPOSED ORDER MODIFYING BRIEFING SCHEDULE
Case No. 3:15-cv-00363-JST
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?