Sabatino v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al

Filing 33

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 32 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER MODIFYING BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO STAY PROCEEDINGS PENDING ARBITRATION filed by Rasier, LLC, Uber Technologies, Inc., Rasier-CA, LLC, RASIER-DC, LLC, Rasier-PA, LLC. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on April 1, 2015. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/1/2015)

Download PDF
1 IRELL & MANELLA LLP Andra Barmash Greene (123931) 2 agreene@irell.com A. Matthew Ashley (198235) 3 mashley@irell.com Justin N. Owens (254733) 4 jowens@irell.com 840 Newport Center Drive, Suite 400 5 Newport Beach, California 92660-6324 Telephone: (949) 760-0991 6 Facsimile: (949) 760-5200 7 Attorneys for Defendants 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION ) 11 JACOB SABATINO, individually, and on behalf of all others similarly situated, ) ) 12 Plaintiff, ) ) 13 vs. ) ) 14 UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., a Delaware ) ) 15 corporation; RASIER, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company; RASIER-CA, LLC, ) ) 16 a Delaware limited liability company; RASIER-DC, LLC, a Delaware limited ) liability company; RASIER-PA, LLC, a ) 17 Delaware limited liability company; and DOES ) ) 18 1 to 25, inclusive, ) Defendants. ) 19 ) 20 Case No. 3:15-cv-00363-JST STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER MODIFYING THE BRIEFING SCHEDULE RE: DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO STAY PROCEEDINGS PENDING ARBITRATION (DKT. NO. 27) Action Filed: January 26, 2015 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3335127 ST IP. AND PROPOSED ORDER MODIFYING BRIEFING SCHEDULE Case No. 3:15-cv-00363-JST Plaintiff Jacob Sabatino ("Plaintiff"), and Defendants Uber Technologies, Inc., Rasier, 1 2 LLC, Rasier-CA, LLC, Rasier-DC, LLC, and Rasier-PA, LLC ("Defendants"), by and through 3 their undersigned counsel, enter into the following stipulation pursuant to Local Rule 6-2 and 4 subject to the Court’s approval for an order modifying the briefing schedule on Defendants’ 5 Motion to Stay Proceedings Pending Arbitration (Dkt. No. 27). The parties have stipulated to a 6 modified briefing schedule permitting Plaintiff thirty (30) days to file his opposition papers, and 7 permitting Defendants ten (10) days to file reply papers. Given the currently scheduled hearing 8 date of May 21, 2015, these modifications will not require any change to the hearing date or to any 9 other Court deadline. In support of the instant stipulation, the Parties state as follows: WHEREAS, on January 26, 2015, Plaintiff filed his putative class action complaint against 10 11 Defendants (Dkt. No. 1); WHEREAS, on February 18, 2015, the Court ordered this case related to Philliben v. Uber 12 13 Technologies, Inc., et al. (United States District Court, Northern District of California, San 14 Francisco Division, Case No. 3:14-cv-05615-JST) and Pappey v. Uber Technologies, Inc. (United 15 States District Court, Northern District of California, San Francisco Division, Case No. 3:15-cv16 00064-JST) (Dkt. No. 23 in Case No. 3:14-cv-05615-JST); WHEREAS, the Parties previously stipulated that if Defendants’ responsive pleading was 17 18 a motion of any kind, the Parties would agree to a mutually convenient briefing schedule (Dkt. No. 19 26); WHEREAS, on March 23, 2015, Defendants filed their Motion to Stay Proceedings 20 21 Pending Arbitration, with a hearing date of May 21, 2015 (Dkt. No. 27); WHEREAS, for the reasons set forth herein, good cause exists to modify the briefing 22 23 scheduled as requested herein; NOW, THEREFORE, IN CONSIDERATION OF THE FOREGOING, IT IS HEREBY 24 25 STIPULATED by and between the Parties that, subject to Court approval, Plaintiff’s opposition to 26 Defendants’ Motion to Stay Proceedings Pending Arbitration will be due on April 22, 2015, and 27 Defendants’ reply thereto will be due on May 4, 2015. IT IS SO STIPULATED. 28 3335127 ST IP. AND PROPOSED ORDER MODIFYING BRIEFING SCHEDULE Case No. 3:15-cv-00363-JST 1 Dated: March 31, 2015 IRELL & MANELLA LLP 2 3 By: /s/ A. Matthew Ashley Andra B. Greene A. Matthew Ashley Justin N. Owens Attorneys for Defendant 4 5 6 7 Dated: March 31, 2015 MLG AUTOMOTIVE GROUP, APLC 8 9 By: /s/ Kathryn Harvey Kathryn Harvey Attorneys for Plaintiff 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -33335127 ST IP. AND PROPOSED ORDER MODIFYING BRIEFING SCHEDULE Case No. 3:15-cv-00363-JST 1 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, THE COURT ORDERS AS FOLLOWS: 2 The briefing schedule on Defendants’ Motion to Stay Proceedings Pending Arbitration 3 (Dkt. No. 27), for which a hearing is currently scheduled for May 21, 2015, is modified as 4 follows: Plaintiff’s opposition to Defendants’ Motion to Stay Proceedings Pending Arbitration 5 shall be due on April 22, 2015, and Defendants’ reply brief shall be due on May 4, 2015. 6 S DERED SO OR SJon S. Tigar Honorable IT I R NIA April 1, 2015 Dated: ________________________ United States District Judge NO 11 RT 12 n J u d ge J o 13 14 A H ER S . Ti ga r N F D IS T IC T O R 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -43335127 FO 10 LI 9 UNIT ED 8 RT U O 7 S DISTRICT TE C TA ST IP. AND PROPOSED ORDER MODIFYING BRIEFING SCHEDULE Case No. 3:15-cv-00363-JST C ECF ATTESTATION 1 I, Justin N. Owens, am the ECF user whose ID and password are being used to file this 2 3 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER MODIFYING THE BRIEFING SCHEDULE RE: 4 DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO STAY PROCEEDINGS PENDING ARBITRATION (DKT. NO. 5 27). I hereby attest that I received authorization to insert the signatures indicated by a conformed 6 signature (/s/) within this e-filed document. By: 7 /s/ Justin N. Owens Justin N. Owens 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -53335127 ST IP. AND PROPOSED ORDER MODIFYING BRIEFING SCHEDULE Case No. 3:15-cv-00363-JST

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?