Sabatino v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al

Filing 37

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 36 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER re 27 MOTION to Stay Proceedings Pending Arbitration filed by Rasier, LLC, Uber Technologies, Inc., Rasier-CA, LLC, RASIER-DC, LLC, Rasier-PA, LLC. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on May 29, 2015. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/29/2015)

1 IRELL & MANELLA LLP
Andra Barmash Greene (123931)
2 [e-mail]
A. Matthew Ashley (198235)
3 [e-mail]
840 Newport Center Drive, Suite 400
4 Newport Beach, California 92660-6324
Telephone: [phone]
5 Facsimile: [phone]
6 Attorneys for Defendants
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

)
11 JACOB SABATINO, individually, and on
behalf of all others similarly situated,
)
)
12
Plaintiffs,
)
)
13
vs.
)
)
14
UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., a Delaware )
)
15 corporation; RASIER, LLC, a Delaware
limited liability company; RASIER-CA, LLC, )
)
16 a Delaware limited liability company;
RASIER-DC, LLC, a Delaware limited
)
liability company; RASIER-PA, LLC, a
)
17
Delaware limited liability company; and DOES )
)
18 1 to 25, inclusive,
)
Defendants.
)
19
)
20

Case No. 3:15-cv-00363-JST
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’
MOTION TO STAY PROCEEDINGS
PENDING ARBITRATION AND
VACATING HEARING AND
CONFERENCE DATES
Action Filed: January 26, 2015

21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

3354178

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO STAY
PROCEEDINGS IN FAVOR OF ARBITRATION (Case No. 3:15-cv-00363-JST)

Plaintiff Jacob Sabatino (“Plaintiff”) and Defendants Uber Technologies, Inc., Rasier,

1

2 LLC, Rasier-CA, LLC, Rasier-DC, LLC, and Rasier-PA, LLC (“Defendants”), by and through
3 their undersigned counsel, enter into the following stipulation pursuant to Local Rule 7-12 and
4 subject to the Court’s approval for an order granting Defendants’ Motion to Stay Proceedings
5 Pending Arbitration and vacating the pending hearing date and case management conference
6 accordingly. In support of this stipulation, the Parties state as follows:
WHEREAS, on January 26, 2015, Plaintiff filed his putative class action complaint against

7

8 Defendant (Dkt. No. 1);
WHEREAS, on March 23, 2015, Defendants filed their Motion to Stay Proceedings

9

10 Pending Arbitration (the “Motion”) on the basis that Plaintiff agreed to arbitrate pursuant to the
11 Terms and Conditions that Plaintiff assented to as part of the Uber registration process (Dkt. No.
12 27);
WHEREAS, on April 22, 2015 Plaintiff filed a Notice of Non-opposition to the Motion

13

14 (Dkt. No. 35);
WHEREAS, Plaintiff does not dispute that this matter should be stayed pending

15

16 arbitration;

18

WHEREAS, a hearing on the Motion is scheduled for June 11, 2015 (Dkt. No. 34);
34
July 22
WHEREAS, a case management conference is scheduled for June 26, 2015 (Dkt. No. 31);

19

WHEREAS, in light of the foregoing, the Parties stipulate and agree that the Court should

17

20 grant Defendants’ Motion;
NOW, THEREFORE, IN CONSIDERATION OF THE FOREGOING, IT IS HEREBY

21

22 STIPULATED by and between the Parties that, subject to Court approval, Defendants’ Motion to
23 Stay Proceedings in Favor of Arbitration be granted, and the pending hearing on the Motion and
24 case management conference be vacated.
25

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

26
27
28
-13354178

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO STAY
PROCEEDINGS IN FAVOR OF ARBITRATION (Case No. 3:15-cv-00363-JST)

1 Dated: May 27, 2015

IRELL & MANELLA LLP

2
3

5

By: /s/ A. Matthew Ashley
Andra B. Greene
A. Matthew Ashley
Attorneys for Defendants

6 Dated: May 27, 2015

MLG AUTOMOTIVE GROUP, APLC

4

7
8

By: /s/ Kathryn Harvey
Kathryn Harvey
Attorneys for Plaintiff

9
10
11

12 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, THE COURT ORDERS AS FOLLOWS:
13

Defendants’ Motion to Stay Proceedings Pending Arbitration is granted. The hearing on

Honorable Jon S. Tigar
United States District Judge
NO

19

RT

ER

n S . Ti g

ar

21

A

H

20

J u d ge J o

N

F
D IS T IC T O
R

22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-23354178

FO

18

LI

17

R NIA

UNIT
ED

S

RT
U
O

14 Defendants’ motion and the case management conference are vacated.
ISTRIC
ES D
15
TC
AT
T
16
May 29, 2015
Dated: ________________________

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO STAY
PROCEEDINGS IN FAVOR OF ARBITRATION (Case No. 3:15-cv-00363-JST)

C

1

ECF ATTESTATION
I, Michael D. Harbour, am the ECF user whose ID and password are being used to file this

2

3 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO
4 STAY PROCEEDINGS PENDING ARBITRATION AND VACATING HEARING AND
5 CONFERENCE DATES. I hereby attest that I received authorization to insert the signatures
6 indicated by a conformed signature (/s/) within this e-filed document.
By:

7
8

/s/ Michael D. Harbour
Michael D. Harbour

9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-33354178

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO STAY
PROCEEDINGS IN FAVOR OF ARBITRATION (Case No. 3:15-cv-00363-JST)