Doe v. Uber Technologies, Inc.

Filing 24

ORDER OF RECUSAL. Signed by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. on 3/24/2015. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/24/2015)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 Jane Doe, Case No. 15-cv-00424-HSG Plaintiff, 8 v. 9 10 ORDER OF RECUSAL Uber Technologies, Inc. Defendants. United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 13 TO ALL PARTIES AND COUNSEL OF RECORD: 14 I, the undersigned judge of the court, finding myself disqualified in the above-entitled 15 action, hereby recuse myself from this case and request that the case be reassigned pursuant to the 16 provisions of paragraph E.2 of the Assignment Plan. 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: March 24, 2015 ______________________________________ HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR. United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?