Doe v. Uber Technologies, Inc.
Filing
24
ORDER OF RECUSAL. Signed by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. on 3/24/2015. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/24/2015)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
7
Jane Doe,
Case No. 15-cv-00424-HSG
Plaintiff,
8
v.
9
10
ORDER OF RECUSAL
Uber Technologies, Inc.
Defendants.
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
13
TO ALL PARTIES AND COUNSEL OF RECORD:
14
I, the undersigned judge of the court, finding myself disqualified in the above-entitled
15
action, hereby recuse myself from this case and request that the case be reassigned pursuant to the
16
provisions of paragraph E.2 of the Assignment Plan.
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: March 24, 2015
______________________________________
HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR.
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?