Doe v. Uber Technologies, Inc.

Filing 49

ORDER, 45 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER Extending Time filed by Jane Doe. Initial Case Management Conference set for 8/7/2015 02:30 PM in Courtroom 10, 19th Floor, San Francisco. Staying briefing on motions.. Signed by Judge Susan Illston on 5/19/15. (tfS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/19/2015)

11
22
33
44
55
66

DOUGLAS H. WIGDOR (NY SBN 2609469)
JEANNE M. CHRISTENSEN (NY SBN 2622124)
TANVIR H. RAHMAN (NY SBN 4921235)
ELIZABETH J. CHEN (NY SBN 5126214)
(Admitted pro hac vice)
WIGDOR LLP
85 Fifth Avenue
New York, NY 10003
Tel.: [phone]
Fax: [phone]

77

ERIC F. YUHL (SBN 102051)
COLIN A. YUHL (SBN 259196)
99 YUHL CARR LLP
4676 Admiralty Way, Suite 550
10 Marina Del Rey, CA 90292
10
Tel.: [phone]
11
11
Fax: [phone]
88

12
12
13
13

Attorneys for Plaintiff,
JANE DOE

14
14

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

15
15
16
16

Case No.: 3:15-cv-00424(SI)

JANE DOE,

17
17

Plaintiff,

18
18

vs.

19
19
20
20

UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.,
Defendant.

21
21
22
22

STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER

23
23
24
24

It is hereby stipulated, by and between Plaintiff Jane Doe (“Plaintiff”) and Defendant Uber

25
25

Technologies, Inc., (“Uber U.S.”) that:

26
26

1.

Uber U.S. consents to extending the time for Plaintiff to file an amended

27
27

complaint pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a), from May 11, 2015 to July 31, 2015;
28
28

Doe v. Uber Technologies, Inc.

1

Stipulation and Proposed Order
Case No. 3:15-cv-00424-(SI)

2.

1
2

The parties respectfully request that the initial case management conference be

continued from June 19, 2015 to August 7, 2015, or another date amenable to the Court; and

3

3.

The parties are still discussing their competing views about the propriety of

4
5

discovery at this stage, but agree in the short term that all discovery shall be stayed at least until

6

August 7, 2015, or seven days before the date of the initial case management conference,

7

whichever is later. Uber U.S. reserves all rights to object to discovery, including but not limited

8

to whether Uber U.S. should be required to provide initial disclosures prior to resolution of

9

motions to dismiss.

10

4.

11

The parties respectfully request that the Court hold in abeyance the briefing

12

schedule for Defendant’s pending motions to dismiss (Docket No. 29, 31), to be set by the Court

13

at the initial case management conference.

14

Dated: May 11, 2015
San Francisco, CA
15
16

Respectfully submitted,

17

WIGDOR LLP

18

By:

19
20
21

/s/ Jeanne M. Christensen
Douglas H. Wigdor
Jeanne M. Christensen
Tanvir H. Rahman
Elizabeth J. Chen

22

85 Fifth Avenue
New York, NY 10003
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]

23
24
25
26
27
28

Doe v. Uber Technologies, Inc.

2

Stipulation and Proposed Order
Case No. 3:15-cv-00424-(SI)

1

YUHL CARR LLP

2

Eric F. Yuhl
Colin A. Yuhl

3
4

4676 Admiralty Way, Suite 550
Marina Del Rey, CA 90292
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]

5
6
7
8

Counsel for Plaintiff

9

GIBSON DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP
10
11

By:

12
13
14

/s/ Perlette Michèle Jura
Michael Li-Ming Wong
Perlette Michèle Jura
Priyanka Rajagopalan
Joseph Tartakovsky

555 Mission Street, Suite 3000
San Francisco, CA 94105-0921
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]

15
16
17
18
19
20

Counsel for Defendant
Uber Technologies, Inc.

21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

Doe v. Uber Technologies, Inc.

3

Stipulation and Proposed Order
Case No. 3:15-cv-00424-(SI)

1
1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

2
2
3
3
4
4

Plaintiff,

5
5

[PROPOSED] ORDER

vs.

6
6
7
7

Case No.: 3:15-cv-00424(SI)

JANE DOE,

UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.,

8
8

Defendant.

9
9
10
10
11
11

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED that Plaintiff is granted leave
to serve an Amended Complaint pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a)(2) in this matter by July 31,

12
12
13
13

2015.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the initial case management conference is continued

14
14
15
15

at 2:30 p.m.
from June 18, 2015 to [August 7, 2015] or [_______________].

16
16
17
17

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that discovery is stayed until August 7, 2015, or until a
date set by the Court at the initial case management conference.

18
18

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the briefing schedule on Defendant’s motions to

19
19
20
20

dismiss is held in abeyance until the initial case management conference, when the Court will set

21
21

a schedule if necessary.

22
22

19
Date: May __, 2015

______________________________
Hon. Susan Illston
United States District Court Judge
Northern District of California

23
23
24
24
25
25
26
26
27
27
28
28

Doe v. Uber Technologies, Inc.

4

Stipulation and Proposed Order
Case No. 3:15-cv-00424-(SI)