Burguin v. Razor Capital LLC et al
Filing
36
ORDER CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE The case management conference currently set for hearing on August 28, 2015 is continued to September 25, 2015, at 10:30 a.m. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on August 18, 2015. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/18/2015)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
File No. 13-15383-0
Robert Scott Kennard
State Bar No. 117017
Email: rskennard@nelson-kennard.com
Clifton Inohara
State Bar No. 242375
Email: cinohara@nelson-kennard.com
2180 Harvard Street, Ste. 160
Sacramento, CA 95815
Tel.: (916) 920-2295
Fax.: (916) 920-0682
Attorneys for Defendants
RAZOR CAPITAL, LLC; NELSON & KENNARD
8
9
10
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
11
12
LAWRENCE BURGUIN,
13
14
Plaintiff,
vs.
15
16
17
18
RAZOR CAPITAL, LLC, a Limited
Liability Company; LIGHTHOUSE
RECOVERY ASSOCIATES, LLC, a
Limited Liability Company;
NELSON & KENNARD, Attorneys at
Law,
19
20
21
22
Defendants.
________________________________
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No.: 15-CV-00427-MMC
(Proposed) ORDER CONTINUING CASE
MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE CURRENTLY
SET FOR HEARING ON AUGUST 28,
2015
DATE:
TIME:
ROOM:
JUDGE:
08/28/15
10:30 a.m.
7
Hon. Maxine M. Chesney
The court having considered the stipulation of the parties to
continue the Case Management Conference currently scheduled for
23
August 28, 2015, and with good cause appearing therefore;
24
25
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Case Management Conference
26
currently scheduled for hearing on August 28, 2015 shall be
27
continued and shall now be heard on September 25, 2015
_____________________________
28
10:30
at _______ a.m./p.m.
(Proposed) ORDER CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE - 1
1
2
3
Dated:_______________
August 18, 2015
________________________________
Honorable Maxine M. Chesney
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
(Proposed) ORDER CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE - 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?