Derrick Elliot Bamer v. Sutter Medical Center

Filing 22

SCHEDULING ORDER. Case Management Statement due by 9/30/2015. Further Case Management Conference set for 10/14/2015 AT 2:00 PM in Courtroom 9, 19th Floor, San Francisco. Final Pretrial Conference set for 5/27/2016 AT 2:00 PM in Courtroom 9, 19t h Floor, San Francisco. Jury Trial set for 6/20/2016 - 7/6/2016 at 8:30 AM in Courtroom 9, 19th Floor, San Francisco before Hon. Jon S. Tigar. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on May 6, 2015. This dates in this Order supersede all dates in the Minute Entry at docket 21 . (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/6/2015)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 8 DERRICK ELLIOT BAMER, Case No. 15-cv-00433-JST Plaintiff, 9 v. SCHEDULING ORDER 10 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 SUTTER MEDICAL CENTER, CASTRO VALLEY, Defendant. 13 14 15 The Court hereby sets the following case deadlines pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 16 and Civil Local Rule 16-10: 16 Event Deadline 17 Case management statement due September 30, 2015 Case management conference October 14, 2015 at 2:00 p.m. Expert disclosures December 4, 2015 Expert rebuttal December 18, 2015 Expert and fact discovery cut-off January 29, 2016 24 Deadline to file dispositive motions March 4, 2016 25 Pretrial conference statement due May 17, 2016 Pretrial conference May 27, 2016 at 2:00 p.m. 18 19 20 21 22 23 26 27 28 Event 1 2 Deadline Trial June 20, 2016 at 8:30 a.m. Estimate of trial length (in days) 10 days 3 4 5 6 7 Counsel may not modify these dates without leave of court. The parties shall comply with the Court’s standing orders, which are available at cand.uscourts.gov/jstorders. The parties must take all necessary steps to conduct discovery, compel discovery, hire 8 counsel, retain experts, and manage their calendars so that they can complete discovery in a timely 9 manner and appear at trial on the noticed and scheduled dates. All counsel must arrange their 10 calendars to accommodate these dates, or arrange to substitute or associate in counsel who can. United States District Court Northern District of California 11 Trial dates set by this Court should be regarded as firm. Requests for continuance are 12 disfavored. The Court will not consider any event subsequently scheduled by a party, party- 13 controlled witness, expert or attorney that conflicts with the above trial date as good cause to grant 14 a continuance. The Court will not consider the pendency of settlement discussions as good cause 15 to grant a continuance. 16 17 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: May 6, 2015 18 19 20 _______________________________________ JON S. TIGAR United States District Judge 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?