Derrick Elliot Bamer v. Sutter Medical Center
Filing
22
SCHEDULING ORDER. Case Management Statement due by 9/30/2015. Further Case Management Conference set for 10/14/2015 AT 2:00 PM in Courtroom 9, 19th Floor, San Francisco. Final Pretrial Conference set for 5/27/2016 AT 2:00 PM in Courtroom 9, 19t h Floor, San Francisco. Jury Trial set for 6/20/2016 - 7/6/2016 at 8:30 AM in Courtroom 9, 19th Floor, San Francisco before Hon. Jon S. Tigar. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on May 6, 2015. This dates in this Order supersede all dates in the Minute Entry at docket 21 . (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/6/2015)
1
2
3
4
5
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
6
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
7
8
DERRICK ELLIOT BAMER,
Case No. 15-cv-00433-JST
Plaintiff,
9
v.
SCHEDULING ORDER
10
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
SUTTER MEDICAL CENTER, CASTRO
VALLEY,
Defendant.
13
14
15
The Court hereby sets the following case deadlines pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil
Procedure 16 and Civil Local Rule 16-10:
16
Event
Deadline
17
Case management statement due
September 30, 2015
Case management conference
October 14, 2015 at
2:00 p.m.
Expert disclosures
December 4, 2015
Expert rebuttal
December 18, 2015
Expert and fact discovery cut-off
January 29, 2016
24
Deadline to file dispositive motions
March 4, 2016
25
Pretrial conference statement due
May 17, 2016
Pretrial conference
May 27, 2016 at 2:00
p.m.
18
19
20
21
22
23
26
27
28
Event
1
2
Deadline
Trial
June 20, 2016 at 8:30
a.m.
Estimate of trial length (in days)
10 days
3
4
5
6
7
Counsel may not modify these dates without leave of court. The parties shall comply with
the Court’s standing orders, which are available at cand.uscourts.gov/jstorders.
The parties must take all necessary steps to conduct discovery, compel discovery, hire
8
counsel, retain experts, and manage their calendars so that they can complete discovery in a timely
9
manner and appear at trial on the noticed and scheduled dates. All counsel must arrange their
10
calendars to accommodate these dates, or arrange to substitute or associate in counsel who can.
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
Trial dates set by this Court should be regarded as firm. Requests for continuance are
12
disfavored. The Court will not consider any event subsequently scheduled by a party, party-
13
controlled witness, expert or attorney that conflicts with the above trial date as good cause to grant
14
a continuance. The Court will not consider the pendency of settlement discussions as good cause
15
to grant a continuance.
16
17
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: May 6, 2015
18
19
20
_______________________________________
JON S. TIGAR
United States District Judge
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?