Rajala v. Sonoma County Go Local Cooperative, Incorporated et al

Filing 63

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 61 STIPULATION and Proposed Order selecting Early Neutral Evaluation by Local Works, Flexible Purpose Corporation(a California corporation), Kelley Rajala(an individual), Kelley Rajala filed by Local Works, Flexible Purpose Corporation, Kelley Rajala. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on January 11, 2016. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/11/2016)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
KELLEY RAJALA, an
individual,
,
Plaintiff(s),
v.
SONOMA COUNTY GO LOCAL
COOPERATIVE, INCORPORATED and
SUSTAINING TECHNOLOGIES

CASE NO. ______________________
3:15-cv-00442-JST

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS

,
Defendant(s).
_______________________________/
Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached the
following stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5:
The parties agree to participate in the following ADR process:
Court Processes:
9
Non-binding Arbitration (ADR L.R. 4)
9
Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) (ADR L.R. 5)
9
Mediation (ADR L.R. 6)
(Note: Parties who believe that an early settlement conference with a Magistrate Judge is
appreciably more likely to meet their needs than any other form of ADR must participate in an
ADR phone conference and may not file this form. They must instead file a Notice of Need for
ADR Phone Conference. See Civil Local Rule 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5)
Private Process:
9
Private ADR (please identify process and provider) ______________________
_____________________________________________________________________________
The parties agree to hold the ADR session by:
9
the presumptive deadline (The deadline is 90 days from the date of the order
referring the case to an ADR process unless otherwise ordered. )
9

other requested deadline _____________________________________________

Dated:___________
01/06/2016

____________________________
/s/Joanna Ardalan
Attorney for Plaintiff

Dated:____________
01/06/2016

____________________________
/s/Craig M. Stainbrook
Attorney for Defendant

CONTINUE TO FOLLOWING PAGE

[PROPOSED] ORDER
The parties’ stipulation is adopted and IT IS SO ORDERED.
The parties’ stipulation is modified as follows, and IT IS SO ORDERED.

UNIT
ED

VED
APPRO

__________________________________

R NIA

Dated: January 11, 2016

ISTRIC
ES D
TC
T
TA

RT
U
O

S

9
9

A

H

ER

n S. T

FO

RT

J u d ge J o

LI

NO

DISTRICT
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
i ga r

N

F
D IS T IC T O
R

C

When filing this document in ECF, please be sure to use the appropriate Docket
Event, e.g., “Stipulation and Proposed Order Selecting Mediation.”

Rev. 12/11
Page 2 of 2