Rajala v. Sonoma County Go Local Cooperative, Incorporated et al

Filing 68

ORDER re 67 Stipulation and [Proposed] Order to Extend ADR Deadline filed by Sustaining Technologies, LLC, Sonoma County Go Local Cooperative, Incorporated. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on February 18, 2016. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/18/2016)

1
2
3
4
5

Craig M. Stainbrook, Calif. State Bar #160876
E-mail: [e-mail]
STAINBROOK & STAINBROOK, LLP
412 Aviation Boulevard, Suite H
Santa Rosa, California 95403
707.578.9333 phone
707.578.3133 fax

6
7
8

Attorneys for Defendants,
Sonoma County Go Local Cooperative,
Incorporated and Sustaining Technologies, LLC

9
10

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

11
12
13

Kelley Rajala,

14

Plaintiff,

15
16
17
18

vs.
Sonoma County Go Local Cooperative,
Incorporated, Et Al.,

19

22
23
24
25
26
27
28

JOINT STIPULATION TO
EXTEND ADR DEADLINE AND
[PROPOSED] ORDER
Honorable Jon S. Tigar

Defendants

20
21

Case No.: 15-CV-00442-JST

Sonoma County Go Local Cooperative,
Incorporated and Sustaining Technologies,
LLC,
vs.

Counterclaimants,

Rajala, Kelley, an individual, and
Local Works, Flexible Purpose Corporation,
A California Corporation,
Counterclaim Defendants.
JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND ADR DEADLINE

Case. No. 15-CV-442-JST

Defendants/Counterclaimants, Sonoma County Go Local Cooperative,

1
2
3

Incorporated and Sustaining Technologies, LLC, and Plaintiffs/Counterclaim

4

Defendants, Kelley Rajala and Local Works, Flexible Purpose Corporation, by and

5

through their respective counsel, hereby agree as follows:

6
7

1.

The current ADR deadline set by the court is April 11, 2016 [Dkt. 63].

8

2.

A pre-ENE phone conference between counsel for all parties and the

9
10
11
12

ENE Evaluator, Daralyn Durie, was held on February 2, 2016.
3.

Times available for the parties and the Evaluator prior to the current

ADR deadline date were limited, so a tentative ENE hearing date of April 14, 2016

13
14
15
16
17

was agreed upon by all parties and the ENE Evaluator.
4.

Because the tentative date for the ENE hearing is after the currently

scheduled ENE deadline [Dkt 63], subject to the approval of the Court, the parties

18

agree and stipulate to extend the ADR deadline for 30 days, from April 11, 2016,

19

to May 11, 2016.

20
21
22
23
24
25

5.

Under the Minutes of a Further CMC [Dkt 56] a joint case

management statement is due April 13, 2016. The parties jointly propose a brief
extension to allow the parties to complete the ENE and report back to the Court in
a joint case management statement to be filed May 16, 2016.

26
27
28

-1-

JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND ADR DEADLINE

Case. No. 15-CV-442-JST

1
2
3
4

6.

No other dates in the current schedule under the Amended Scheduling

Order [Dkt 54], including dates for filing dispositive motions, pre-trial briefs and
motions, or trial, need be disturbed.

5

Respectfully Submitted,

6
7

Dated: February 17, 2016

STAINBROOK & STAINBROOK, LLP

8

By: /s/ Craig M. Stainbrook

9
10

Craig M. Stainbrook
[e-mail]

11

Attorneys for Defendants/Counterclaimants
Sonoma County Go Local Cooperative,
Incorporated and Sustaining Technologies,
LLC

12
13
14
15
16
17

Dated: February 17, 2016

ONE LLP

18
19
20
21
22
23
24

By: /s/ Joanna Ardalan
________________________________
Joanna Ardalan
[e-mail]
Attorneys for Plaintiff/Counterdefendants
Kelley Rajala and Local Works, Flexible
Purpose Corporation

25
26
27
28

-2-

JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND ADR DEADLINE

Case. No. 15-CV-442-JST

1

ORDER

2

5

is extended to May 11, 2016.

13

R NIA

ER

H

12

RT

11

NO

10

_________________________________________
OVED
APPRS. Tigar,
Honorable Jon
U.S. District Court Judge
Ti ga r
e Jon S.
Judg
FO

9

Dated: February 18, 2016

UNIT
ED

8

S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA

RT
U
O

7

S

6

LI

4

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS ORDERED that the ADR deadline

14

A

3

N

F
D IS T IC T O
R

C

15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

-3-

JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND ADR DEADLINE

Case. No. 15-CV-442-JST