Cramer v. Lowe's Home Centers, LLC

Filing 20

ORDER re 19 STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER filed by Lowe's Home Centers, LLC. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on September 14, 2015. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/14/2015)

1 CHARLES D. MAY, ESQ~·
STATE BAR NO.: 129663
GENE B. SHARAGA, ES :STATE BARNO.: 131661
2 BRIAN J. KIM, ESQ.; STA
BAR NO.: 282538
3
4
5

6
7

Attorneys for Defendan~
LOWE'S HOivJ.E \_;ENTERS, LLC

8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA- SAN FRANCISCO OFFICE

10

......
g~

11

:ji~

12

~~j!

.J' ........
~z~
~

0

...e
1~
0
·t

13

ROGER CRAMER,

CASE NO.: 15-cv-00480-JST
(San Francisco County Superior Court Case
No.: SCV256419)

Plaintiff;

v.

:J:~ol

14 LOWE'S HOME CENTERS, LLC,

ll:l£!-1

15

~ i

STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER

16

~oU
C:Q ..

~.eo

~o@
~

u

&I) ..a
..,.en

and
DOES 1 T020,

17

Plaintiff ROGER CRAMER ("Plaintiff') and Defendant LOWE HOME

18

CENTERS, LLC ("Defendant") jointly submit this Stipulated Protective Order

19

pursuant to Federal Rules ofCiyil Procedure, Rule 26(c)(l) limiting the use and

20

disposition of certain information, materials, and documents during litigation of this

21

matter. The parties agree that discovery in this action may yield documents,

22

materials, and information of a sensitive and confidential nature, including but not

23

limited to, Defendant's proprietary policies and procedures, security related

24

information, personnel files of present and former employees, and other confidential

25

information that may be subject to discovery in the proceedings in this matter but

26

which should not be made available to the public generally. As a result, the parties

27

have agreed to this jointly submitted Stipulated Protective Order and request that it

28

be adopted by order of this Court.
- 1STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER

Cramer v. Lowe's.
Case No.: I S-cv-()0480-JST

1

Good Cause Statement

2

Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule 26(c)(l) states in pertinent part, that

3

the Court, upon a showing of good cause may "issue an order to protect a party from

4

annoyance, embarrassment, oppression, or undue burden or expense." Fed.R.Civ.P.

5

26(c)(l). In the instant matter, Defendant's Confidential Documents contain

6

proprietary and confidential trade secret information relating to defendant's business

7

practices and its safety protocol. Defendant derives independent economic value

8

from maintaining the confidentiality of the policies and procedures set forth in these

9

Confidential Documents.

10

Defendant is a retailer in the home improvement industry and has conducted

8~

11

business in California since 1998. The home improvement retail industry is very

=i"S3
--·- ....
; -a·@
~ 0

12

competitive. As a result of years of investing time and money in research and

13

investigation, defendant developed the policies contained in the Confidential

14

Documents for the purposes of maintaining the security and accessibility of its

~e-B

15

merchandise, providing quality customer service, and ensuring the safety of its

~ ~

16

employees and customers. These policies and procedures, as memorialized in the

17

Confidential Documents, were created and generated by Lowe's for Lowe's, and are

18

used for the purposes of maintaining safety at its stores and creating efficient and

19

organized work environments for its employees. As a result, defendant is able to

20

minimize the waste of any resources, which is a key factor in generating profitability

21

for its business.

~ltj!

...:~zO\

ot~

:Cgu
~ IQ

..

~ao

£-4o@
~ u
~cJJ

22

Defendant derives economic value from maintaining the secrecy of its

23

Confidential Documents. If disclosed to the public, the trade secret information

24

contained in defendant's Confidential Documents would reveal defendant's internal

25

operations and could potentially be used by competitors as a means to compete for

26

its customers, interfere with its business plans and thereby gain unfair business

27

advantages. If defendant's safety protocol were revealed to the general pUblic, it

28

would hinder defendant's ability to effectively resolve and minimize liability claims,
-2STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER

Cramer v. Lowe's.

Case No.: IS-cv-00480-JST

1

and its goal of protecting its customers and employees from theft and other crimes.

2

Unrestricted or unprotected disclosure of such information would result in prejudice

3

or harm to Defendant by revealing Lowe's competitive confidential information,

4

which has been developed at the expense of Lowe's and which represents valuable

5

tangible and intangible assets. Accordingly, the parties respectfully submit that there

6

is good cause for the entry of this Protective Order.

7

Purpose and Limitation

8

As mentioned above, disclosure and discovery activity in this action are likely

9 to involve production of confidential, proprietary, security related, or private
10

information for which special protection from public disclosure and from use for any

11

purpose other than prosecuting this litigation may be warranted. Accordingly, the

:i-Bi

12

parties hereby stipulate to and petition the court to enter the following Stipulated

~t~
:r:gu
~= .
~~~

13

Protective Order.

... '1-4

g~
~ri:'?

.!~~
~ -;·!

~J~
E-t~B

~~

14

The disclosure of any of the foregoing categories of information and/or

15

documentation protected by this Order, including confidential business and financial

16

information identified above, will have the effect of causing harm to the competitive

17

and financial position of the person, firm, partnership, corporation, or to the

18

organization from which the information was obtained. Unprotected disclosure of

19

any of the above identified confidential information may further expose Defendant to

20

unwarranted annoyance, embarrassment, and/or oppression.

21

The parties acknowledge that this Protective Order does not confer blanket

22

protections on all disclosures or responses to discovery and that the protection it

23

affords from public disclosure and use extends only to the limited information that is

24

entitled to confidential treatment under the applicable legal principles. The parties

25

further acknowledge that this Protective Order does not entitle them to file

26

confidential information under seal. Civil Local Rules 79-5 set forth the procedures

27

that must be followed and the standards that will be applied when a party seeks

28

permission from the court to file material under seal.
-3STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER

Cramer v. Lowe's.

Case No.: IS-cv.00480-JST

1

The parties having agreed to the following terms governing the treatment of

2 confidential information, and the Court having found that good cause exists for
3

issuance of an appropriately-tailored confidentiality order governing the pre-trial

4

phase of this action, it is HEREBY ORDERED as follows:

5

1.

All documents or materials produced or information disclosed and any

6

other documents or records designated as "CONFIDENTIAL" by the Defendant

7

shall be revealed only to a settlement officer, Plaintiff, counsel of record in this case,

8 paralegals and secretarial employees under counsel's direct supervision, and such
9 persons as are employed by counsel to act as experts in this action. The information
10

designated as "CONFIDENTIAL" and disclosed only in accord with the terms of

~~

11

this paragraph may include, without limitation, documents and information

:j.a,
...s ...
..:IZO\

12

containing Defendant's policies and procedures, security related information,

..:I

13

including surVeillance video, as well as personnel records, including disciplinary

14

records, identity, information relating to the processes, operations, type of work, or

15

apparatus, or the production, sales, shipments, transfers, identification of customers,

16

inventories, amount or source of income, profits, losses, expenditures, or any

.17

research, development, or any other commercial information supplied by the

...

~~~

8

...

~1~
=.
~r!~

:Z:gu
~

~ao
~ i
~~~
~~

18

Defendant in response to Plaintiff's Interrogatories or Requests for Production.

19

Information and documentation considered "CONFIDENTIAL" are subject to

20

protection under Civil Local Rule 79-5 of the U.S. District Court- Northern District

21

of California, Rule 26 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and under other

22

provisions of Federal law.

23

2.

Counsel for Plaintiff shall use all documents, materials, and/or

24

information produced or disclosed by the Defendant solely for the purposes of

25

preparation for and trial of this action. Under no circumstances shall information or

26

materials covered by this Protective Order be disclosed to anyone other than

27

Plaintiff's counsel of record in this action, paralegals, secretarial employees under

28

counsel's direct supervision, and such persons employed to act as experts in this
-4STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER

Cramer v. Lowe's.
Case No.: 1S-cv.00480-JST

1

action. At the conclusion of the proceedings in this action, all documents and

2

information subject to this Order, including any copies or extracts or summaries

3

thereof, or documents containing information taken therefrom, shall be returned to

4

counsel for the Defendant, at defense counsel's written request.
3.

5

Prior to disclosure of any documents designated as "confidential" to

6

paralegals or secretarial employees of counsel or Plaintiff, counsel for Plaintiff shall

7

require such employees to read this Protective Order and agree t~ be bound by its

8

terms.

9

· 4.

If counsel for Plaintiff determines that for purposes of this action,

10

documents or information produced by the Defendant and designated as

g~

11

"confidential" must be revealed to a person employed to act as an expert in this

:J'fi,
:f ·- 0:
z

12

action, then counsel may reveal the designated documents or information to such

13

person, after frrst complying with the following:

..

~

~fi:~
tiS

~ -;·~

ot~
:I:g(.)
~

"' ..

14

r:Qe-!

15

~~~

16

(a)

~ao

E-ci?Jo
~;5

CounseJ for the Plaintiff shall have the expert read this Order and shall
explain the contents thereof to such expert.

(b)

Counsel for the Plaintiff shall require such expert to sign a copy of this

17

protective order that states: "I have read and understood the terms of

18

this protective order. I further agree to be bound by its terms." Nothing

19

in this paragraph shall be deemed to enlarge the right of Defendant to

20

conduct discovery of any of Plaintiff's experts, except solely with

21

respect to the ability of such expert to protect confidential information

22

and documents from re-disclosure.

23

5.

In accordance with Local Rule 79-5, if any papers to be filed with the

24

Court contain information and/or documents that have been designated as

25

"Confidential," the proposed filing shall be accompanied by an application to file the

26

papers or the portion thereof containing the designated information or documents (if

27

such portion is segregable) under seal; and the application shall be directed to the

28

judge to whom the papers are directed. For motions, the parties shall publicly file a
-5STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER

Cramer v. Lowc•s.
Case No.: IS-cv-00480.JST

redacted version of the motion and supporting papers.
2

6.

The Court's Order is subject to revocation and modification by Order of

3

the Court upon written stipulation of the parties, or upon motion and reasonable

4

notice, including opportunity for hearing and presentation of evidence.

5

6
7

7.

Any motion challenging a designation will need to be made in strict

compliance \Vith Local Rules 37-l and 37-2.
8.

Nothing contained in this Order is intended or should be construed as

8 authorizing a party in this action to disobey a lawfu l subpoena issued in another
9
10

action.
Based on the foregoing, Plaintiff ROGER CRAMER and Defendant LOWE'S

II

HOME CENTERS, LLC hereby request that this CoUI1 issue a protective order

12

governing the treatment of confidential information in this matter.

13

14

i'ljt

IT IS SO STIPULATED.
Dated:

15

THARPE & HOWELL, LLP

S

16

By:__J_~ -­
~~·CHARLES D. MAY
GENE B. SHARAGA
BRIAN J. KIM
Attornexs for Defendants
LOWE S HOME CENTERS, LLC

17

18
19

20

I

21

22

Dated:

7fJ
I

I

Attorney for Plainti ff,
ROGER CRAMER

24

26
27

FOR GOOD CAUSE SHOWN, IT IS SO ORDERED.
Date: September 14, 2015

28
- G-

HON. JON S. TIGAR
U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER

Cramer v. Lowe· s.
Case No.: 15-cv-O <ISO·JST
O