Austin v. State of California

Filing 26

ORDER DENYING REDRESS. Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 01/12/2017. (crblc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/12/2017)

Download PDF
1 2 3 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 6 GREGORY A. AUSTIN, Nos. 7 Plaintiff, 8 v. 9 STATE OF CALIFORNIA, United States District Court For the Northern District of California 10 Defendant. 11 12 13 / 3:15-cv-00504-CRB 3:15-cv-00505-CRB 3:15-cv-00508-CRB 3:15-cv-00510-CRB 3:15-cv-00511-CRB 3:15-cv-00512-CRB 3:15-cv-00513-CRB 3:15-cv-00514-CRB 3:15-cv-00516-CRB 3:15-cv-00526-CRB 3:15-cv-00528-CRB 3:15-cv-00533-CRB 3:15-cv-00535-CRB 3:15-cv-01717-CRB 14 ORDER DENYING REDRESS 15 16 On April 1, 2015, the Court dismissed each and every one of the above cases with 17 prejudice and then entered judgment against Plaintiff. See IFP Order (dkt. 22) at 12; 18 Judgment (dkt. 23). That was no April Fool’s joke. So to the extent Plaintiff’s “Writ of 19 Certiorari,” “Plead to Waive Time Limit,” “Stance on Marital Dissolution,” and “Initial 20 Grievance Petition Attachment” can be read to seek redress of some kind, they are DENIED. 21 IT IS SO ORDERED. 22 Dated: January 12, 2017 23 24 25 26 27 28 CHARLES R. BREYER UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?