Austin v. State of California

Filing 21

ORDER DISMISSING CASE. Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 02/16/2017. (crblc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/16/2017) (Additional attachment(s) added on 2/17/2017: #1 Certificate/Proof of Service) (lsS, COURT STAFF).

1
2
3
4
5

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

6

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

7
8

GREGORY A. AUSTIN

United States District Court
For the Northern District of California

11
12

ORDER DISMISSING CASE WITH
PREJUDICE

Plaintiff,

9
10

No. 3:15-cv-0534-CRB

v.
STATE OF CALIFORNIA,
Defendant.

/

13
14

Before thirteen of Plaintiff’s cases were dismissed with prejudice, see Order (dkt. 15),

15

this case was dismissed with leave to amend not later than February 25, 2015, see Order (dkt.

16

5). Plaintiff did not file an amended complaint within that time. The Court DISMISSES the

17

case for failure to prosecute under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b).

18

What is more, this case—like the rest—is frivolous. See Order (dkt. 15) at 12 (“The

19

actions of which he complains are, without exception, well-established and integral aspects

20

of family law and the general social order. His quarrels with the state of affairs in which his

21

domestic violence actions have left him were long-ago rejected, or are so frivolous as never

22

to have been credible.”). That fact alone is also ample reason to dismiss with prejudice.

23

IT IS SO ORDERED.

24

Dated: February 16, 2017
CHARLES R. BREYER
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

25
26
27
28
1