Rothchild Storage Retrieval Innovations, LLC, LLC v. Apple Inc.

Filing 83

ORDER Continuing Stay and Requiring Further Status Update by Magistrate Judge Elizabeth D. Laporte. (shyS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/22/2015)

1
2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

3

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

4
5

ROTHSCHILD STORAGE RETRIEVAL
INNOVATIONS, LLC,
Plaintiff,

6
7
8
9

SONY MOBILE COMMUNICATIONS
(U.S.A), INC.,
Defendant.

United States District Court
Northern District of California

11
ROTHSCHILD STORAGE RETRIEVAL
INNOVATIONS, LLC,

13

Plaintiff,

14

v.

15

HTC CORP., et al.,

16

Defendants.

17

ROTHSCHILD STORAGE RETRIEVAL
INNOVATIONS, LLC,

18

Plaintiff,

19
20
21

v.
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO. LTD., et
al.
Defendants.

22
23

ROTHSCHILD STORAGE RETRIEVAL
INNOVATIONS, LLC,

24
25
26
27
28

Case No. 15-cv-00373-EDL
Case No. 15-cv-00539-EDL

v.

10

12

Case No. 15-cv-00234-EDL

Plaintiff,
v.
APPLE, INC.
Defendant.

Case No. 15-cv-00541-EDL
ORDER CONTINUING STAY AND
REQUIRING FURTHER STATUS
UPDATE

1

On May 6, 2015, this Court granted Defendants’ motions to stay these four related cases

2

pending the PTAB’s decision on whether to institute inter partes review of the patent at issue. The

3

Court ordered the parties to provide a written update on the status of the proceedings before the

4

PTAB within one week of its decision on whether to institute IPR of the ‘797 Patent. The parties

5

have informed the Court that on July 13, 2015 the PTAB instituted an inter partes review of all

6

claims of the patent at issue. These cases shall remain stayed and the parties are to provide the

7

Court with a written update on the status of the proceedings before the PTAB within one week of

8

a final written decision, or by July 20, 2016, whichever is earlier.

9
10

United States District Court
Northern District of California

11

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: July 22, 2015

12
________________________
ELIZABETH D. LAPORTE
United States Magistrate Judge

13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2