Lucido v. Nestle Purina Pet Care Company

Filing 108

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 107 Stipulation for Dismissal of Counts 44 and 45 only filed by Nestle Purina Pet Care Company. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 8/10/16. (bpfS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/10/2016)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17

RAM, OLSON, CEREGHINO &
KOPCZYNSKI
MICHAEL F. RAM (SBN 104805)
[e-mail]
555 Montgomery Street, Suite 820
San Francisco, CA 94111
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
[Additional counsel on signature page]
Attorneys for Plaintiffs and Proposed Class
MAYER BROWN LLP
CARMINE R. ZARLENGA (D.C. Bar. No.
286244)
[e-mail]
1999 K Street, N.W.
Washington, DC 20006-1101
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
MAYER BROWN LLP
DALE J. GIALI (SBN 150382)
KERI E. BORDERS (SBN 194015)
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
350 South Grand Avenue, 25th Floor
Los Angeles, CA 90071
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Attorneys for Defendant
Nestlé Purina PetCare Company

18

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

19

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

20
21

FRANK LUCIDO, et al, on behalf of himself
and all others similarly situated,

22
23
24
25

Case No. 4:15-cv-00569-EMC
STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF
COUNTS 44 AND 45 ONLY BY
PLAINTIFF LANCE CARLSON
PURSUANT TO FED. R. CIV. P.
41(a)(1)(A)(ii)

Plaintiffs,
v.
NESTLÉ PURINA PETCARE COMPANY, a
Missouri corporation; and DOES 1 through 200,
inclusive,

26

Defendants.

27
28
STIPULATION RE DISMISSAL OF COUNTS 44 AND 45;
CASE NO. 4:15-CV-00569-EMC
721207579.1

1
2

TO THE COURT AND ALL PARTIES AND THEIR COUNSEL OF RECORD:
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by Plaintiff Lance Carlson and Defendant Nestlé Purina

3

PetCare Company (“Purina”), by and through their respective counsel, that this Court dismiss

4

Counts 44 and 45 of the Third Amended Complaint only asserted by Lance Carlson against

5

Purina, with prejudice, pursuant to 41(a)(1)(A)(ii).

6

Dated: August 9, 2016

RAM, OLSON, CEREGHINO &
KOPCZYNSKI LLP
Jeffrey B. Cereghino
Michael F. Ram
Matt J. Malone
Susan Brown

7
8
9

MORGAN &MORGAN COMPLEX
LITIGATION GROUP
John Yanchunis
James Young

10
11
12

TERRELL MARSHALL DAUDT & WILLIE
PLLC
Beth Terrell
Adrienne Mcentee

13
14

PASTOR LAW OFFICE, LLP
David Pastor

15
16

LEONARD LAW OFFICE, PC
Preston W. Leonard

17

FINKELSTEIN, BLANKINSHIP, FREIPEARSON & GARBER, LLP
Todd Garber
Greg Blankinship

18
19
20

CONSUMER LAW GROUP
Alan Mansfield

21

LACKEY HERSHMAN, L.L.P.
Roger Mandel

22
23

GILMAN LAW LLP
Kenneth Gilman

24

CUNEO GILBERT & LADUCA, LLLP
Michael Flannery

25
26

THE ANIMAL LAW CENTER
Jennifer R. Edwards

27
28

1
STIPULATION RE DISMISSAL OF COUNTS 44 AND 45;
CASE NO. 4:15-CV-00569-EMC
721207579.1

THE RICHMAN LAW GROUP
Kim Richman

1
2
3

By

/s/ Michael F. Ram
Michael F. Ram
Attorneys for Plaintiffs and Proposed Class

4
5
6
Dated: August 9, 2016

MAYER BROWN LLP
Carmine R. Zarlenga
Dale J. Giali
Keri E. Borders

7
8

RT

15
16

. Chen

dward M

Judge E

ER

By: /s/ Keri E. Borders
Keri E. Borders
Attorneys for Defendant Nestlé Purina Petcare
Company

A

H

14

R NIA

NO

13

I

ERED

ORD
T IS SO

FO

UNIT
ED

12

10

LI

11

ISTRIC
ES D
TC
AT
T

RT
U
O

S

9

N

F
D IS T IC T O
R

C

ATTESTATION

I, Keri E. Borders, hereby attest, pursuant to N.D. Cal. Local Rule 5-1(i)(3) that
agreement to the filing of this document has been obtained from each signatory.

17
18

By:

/s/ Keri E .Borders
Keri E. Borders
Attorneys for Defendant Nestlé Purina Petcare Company

19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

STIPULATION RE AUTHENTICITY OF CERTAIN LABORATORY TESTING RESULTS;
CASE NO. 4:15-CV-00569-EMC
721207579.1