Lucido v. Nestle Purina Pet Care Company

Filing 32

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 31 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER RE: FILING OF FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT filed by Frank Lucido, Motions terminated: 30 MOTION for Extension of Time to File First Amended Complaint filed by Frank Lucido, 31 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER RE: FILING OF FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT filed by Frank Lucido.. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 4/24/15. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/24/2015)

Download PDF
1 Jeffrey B. Cereghino, SBN 099480 Email: jbc@rocklawcal.com 2 Michael F. Ram, SBN 104805 Email: mram@rocklawcal.com 3 Matt J. Malone, SBN 221545 Email: mjm@rocklawcal.com 4 Susan Brown, SBN 287986 Email: sbrown@rocklawcal.com 5 RAM, OLSON, CEREGHINO & KOPCZYNSKI LLP 6 555 Montgomery Street, Suite 820 San Francisco, California 94111 7 Telephone: (415) 433-4949 Facsimile: (415) 433-7311 8 John Yanchunis, FLBN 324681 9 Email: jyanchunis@forthepeople.com MORGAN & MORGAN COMPLEX 10 LITIGATION GROUP 201 N Franklin Street, Floor 7 11 Tampa, FL 33602-5157 Telephone: (813)275-5272 12 Facsimile: (813)275-9295 13 [Additional Counsel on Signature Page] 14 Attorneys for Plaintiff and Proposed Class 15 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 17 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 18 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 19 FRANK LUCIDO, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, 20 Plaintiff, 21 v. 22 NESTLE PURINA PET CARE COMPANY, 23 Defendant. 24 Case No. 15-cv-00569- EMC CLASS ACTION STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE: FILING OF FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT 25 Hearing Date: Time: Judge: Courtroom: N/A N/A H on. Edward M. Chen 5 26 Complaint Filed: February 5, 2015 27 28 . 1 STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER RE FILING OF FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT Case No. 15-cv-00569-EMC 1 Following a conference between the Court, Plaintiff’s counsel Michael F. Ram, and 2 Defendant’s counsel Dale J. Giali, the parties STIPULATE as follows: 3 1. Plaintiff shall have until June 8, 2015 to file his First Amended Complaint. 4 2. The parties shall meet and confer concerning Defendant’s proposal to continue the 5 June 11, 2015 Case Management Conference and the timing and substance of the 6 Rule 26(f) Conference. If necessary, the parties will request the guidance of the 7 Court through the submission of a joint letter. 8 9 Dated: April 22, 2015 10 11 12 13 RAM OLSON CEREGHINO & KOPCZYNSKI By: /S/Michael F. Ram Michael F. Ram mram@rocklawcal.com 555 Montgomery Street, Suite 820 San Francisco, CA 94111 Telephone: (415) 433-4949 Facsimile: (415) 433-7311 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 John Yanchunis, FLBN 324681 jyanchunis@forthepeople.com MORGAN & MORGAN COMPLEX LITIGATION GROUP 201 N Franklin Street, Floor 7 Tampa, FL 33602-5157 Telephone: (813)275-5272 Facsimile: (813)275-9295 Donna F. Solen, SBN 297051 Email: dsolen@kkslegal.com KIMBRELL KIMBRELL & SOLEN LLC 660 Pennsylvania Avenue, SE Suite 302 Washington, DC 20003 Telephone: (202) 810-1999 ext. 1 Attorneys for Plaintiff and Proposed Class 24 25 26 27 28 2 STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER RE FILING OF FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT Case No. 15-Case No. 15-cv-00569-EMC 1 2 Dated: April 22, 2015 MAYER BROWN 3 By: /S/Dale J. Giali Dale J. Giali dgiali@mayerbrown.com 350 South Grand Avenue, 25th Floor Los Angeles, CA 90071-1503 4 5 6 7 Telephone: (213) 229-9500 Facsimile: (213) 625-0248 8 Attorneys for Defendant 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3 STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER RE FILING OF FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT Case No. 15-Case No. 15-cv-00569-EMC ORDER 1 2 SO ORDERED. 3 Dated this ______ day of _____________________, 2015. April S 7 UNIT ED 6 RT U O 5 S DISTRICT TE C TA By: Hon.ANTED Chen Edward M. GR United States District Judge 8 ER LI dwa Judge E A H 11 RT 10 hen rd M. C NO 9 R NIA 4 FO 24th N F D IS T IC T O R C 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 4 STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER RE FILING OF FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT Case No. 15-Case No. 15-cv-00569-EMC

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?