Lucido v. Nestle Purina Pet Care Company
Filing
32
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 31 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER RE: FILING OF FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT filed by Frank Lucido, Motions terminated: 30 MOTION for Extension of Time to File First Amended Complaint filed by Frank Lucido, 31 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER RE: FILING OF FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT filed by Frank Lucido.. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 4/24/15. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/24/2015)
1 Jeffrey B. Cereghino, SBN 099480
Email: jbc@rocklawcal.com
2 Michael F. Ram, SBN 104805
Email: mram@rocklawcal.com
3 Matt J. Malone, SBN 221545
Email: mjm@rocklawcal.com
4 Susan Brown, SBN 287986
Email: sbrown@rocklawcal.com
5 RAM, OLSON, CEREGHINO
& KOPCZYNSKI LLP
6 555 Montgomery Street, Suite 820
San Francisco, California 94111
7 Telephone: (415) 433-4949
Facsimile: (415) 433-7311
8
John Yanchunis, FLBN 324681
9 Email: jyanchunis@forthepeople.com
MORGAN & MORGAN COMPLEX
10 LITIGATION GROUP
201 N Franklin Street, Floor 7
11 Tampa, FL 33602-5157
Telephone: (813)275-5272
12 Facsimile: (813)275-9295
13 [Additional Counsel on Signature Page]
14 Attorneys for Plaintiff and Proposed Class
15
16
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
17
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
18
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
19 FRANK LUCIDO, on behalf of himself and
all others similarly situated,
20
Plaintiff,
21
v.
22
NESTLE PURINA PET CARE COMPANY,
23
Defendant.
24
Case No. 15-cv-00569- EMC
CLASS ACTION
STIPULATION AND
[PROPOSED]
ORDER RE: FILING OF FIRST
AMENDED COMPLAINT
25
Hearing Date:
Time:
Judge:
Courtroom:
N/A
N/A
H on. Edward M. Chen
5
26
Complaint Filed: February 5, 2015
27
28
.
1
STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER RE FILING OF FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT
Case No. 15-cv-00569-EMC
1
Following a conference between the Court, Plaintiff’s counsel Michael F. Ram, and
2 Defendant’s counsel Dale J. Giali, the parties STIPULATE as follows:
3
1.
Plaintiff shall have until June 8, 2015 to file his First Amended Complaint.
4
2.
The parties shall meet and confer concerning Defendant’s proposal to continue the
5
June 11, 2015 Case Management Conference and the timing and substance of the
6
Rule 26(f) Conference. If necessary, the parties will request the guidance of the
7
Court through the submission of a joint letter.
8
9 Dated: April 22, 2015
10
11
12
13
RAM OLSON CEREGHINO & KOPCZYNSKI
By:
/S/Michael F. Ram
Michael F. Ram
mram@rocklawcal.com
555 Montgomery Street, Suite 820
San Francisco, CA 94111
Telephone: (415) 433-4949
Facsimile: (415) 433-7311
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
John Yanchunis, FLBN 324681
jyanchunis@forthepeople.com
MORGAN & MORGAN COMPLEX
LITIGATION GROUP
201 N Franklin Street, Floor 7
Tampa, FL 33602-5157
Telephone: (813)275-5272
Facsimile: (813)275-9295
Donna F. Solen, SBN 297051
Email: dsolen@kkslegal.com
KIMBRELL KIMBRELL & SOLEN LLC
660 Pennsylvania Avenue, SE
Suite 302
Washington, DC 20003
Telephone: (202) 810-1999 ext. 1
Attorneys for Plaintiff and Proposed Class
24
25
26
27
28
2
STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER RE FILING OF FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT
Case No. 15-Case No. 15-cv-00569-EMC
1
2 Dated: April 22, 2015
MAYER BROWN
3
By:
/S/Dale J. Giali
Dale J. Giali
dgiali@mayerbrown.com
350 South Grand Avenue, 25th Floor
Los Angeles, CA 90071-1503
4
5
6
7
Telephone: (213) 229-9500
Facsimile: (213) 625-0248
8
Attorneys for Defendant
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER RE FILING OF FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT
Case No. 15-Case No. 15-cv-00569-EMC
ORDER
1
2
SO ORDERED.
3
Dated this ______ day of _____________________, 2015.
April
S
7
UNIT
ED
6
RT
U
O
5
S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
By:
Hon.ANTED Chen
Edward M.
GR
United States District Judge
8
ER
LI
dwa
Judge E
A
H
11
RT
10
hen
rd M. C
NO
9
R NIA
4
FO
24th
N
F
D IS T IC T O
R
C
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
4
STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER RE FILING OF FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT
Case No. 15-Case No. 15-cv-00569-EMC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?