Ryan v. The Habit Restaurants, LLC et al

Filing 24

STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO ANSWER (23) Stipulation filed by Hart Pacific Commons Block 5 Owner, LLC. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 5/19/15. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/19/2015)

1
2
3
4
5
6

Kenneth L. Valinoti, Esq., SBN 118442
James S. McPherson, Esq., SBN 178608
VALINOTI, SPECTER & DITO, LLP
353 Sacramento Street, Suite 1140
San Francisco, California 94111-3657
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
Attorneys for Defendant
HART Pacific Commons Block 5 Owner, LLC

7
8
9
10

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

11

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19

CASE NO.: 3:15-CV-00611-JCS

SEAN RYAN,

STIPULATION OF DEFENDANT HART
PACIFIC COMMONS BLOCK 5
OWNER, LLC AND PLAINTIFF SEAN
RYAN TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND
TO FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT

Plaintiff,
vs.
THE HABIT RESTAURANTS LLC, dba THE
HABIT BURGER GRILL; HART PACIFIC
COMMONS BLOCK 5 OWNER, LLC,

[Northern District Rule 6-1(a)]

Defendants

20
21
22

Plaintiff SEAN RYAN and Defendant HART PACIFIC COMMONS BLOCK 5

23

OWNER, LLC (“HART”), by and through their counsel of record, do hereby stipulate to extend

24

the time within which Defendant may file a responsive pleading to Plaintiff’s First Amended

25

Complaint by fifteen (15) days.

26

Procedural Grounds for Stipulation:

27

The parties may agree between themselves to extend time within which to answer or

28

otherwise respond to the complaint. Pursuant to Northern District Federal Court Rule 6-1:
STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT
-1-

1

Enlarging or Shortening Time:

2

5

(a) When Stipulation Permissible Without Court Order. Parties may stipulate in
writing, without a Court order, to extend the time within which to answer or
otherwise respond to the complaint, or to enlarge or shorten the time in matters
not required to be filed or lodged with the Court, provided the change will not
alter the date of any event or any deadline already fixed by Court order. Such
stipulations shall be promptly filed pursuant to Civil L.R. 5.

6

Accordingly, the parties agree that Defendant HART’s responsive pleading shall be due

3
4

7
8

on or before June 1, 2015.
SO STIPULATED.

9
10

Dated: May 15, 2015

VALINOTI, SPECTER & DITO, LLP

11
_________/s/ Kenneth L. Valinoti______________
Kenneth L. Valinoti,
Attorney for Defendant HART PACIFIC
COMMONS BLOCK 5 OWNER, LLC

12
13
14
15

Dated: May 15, 2015

MOORE LAW FIRM, P.C.

16
_________/s/ Tanya E. Moore_________________
Tanya E. Moore,
Attorney for Plaintiff

17
18

27

S

ER

H

26

FO

RT

25

en
d M. Ch
e Edwar
Judg

NO

24

D

LI

23

RDERE

OO
IT IS S

A

22

RT
U
O

21

S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA

IT IS SO ORDERED:
____________________
Edward M. Chen
U.S. District Judge

UNIT
ED

20

R NIA

19

N

F
D IS T IC T O
R

C

28
STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT
-2-

1
2

ATTESTATION

3
4

I, Kenneth L. Valinoti, hereby attest that I have obtained the concurrence of Tanya E.

5

Moore, Attorney for Plaintiff, in the filing of the attached Stipulation and the entry of her

6

signature as indicated thereon.

7

Dated: May 15, 2015

8

/s/ Kenneth L. Valinoti_________________
Kenneth L. Valinoti, Attorney for Defendant
HART PACIFIC COMMONS BLOCK 5 OWNER, LLC

9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT
-3-