Harris v. Best Buy Stores, L.P.

Filing 26

ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting in Part and Denying in Part 18 Stipulation. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/31/2015) Modified on 8/31/2015 to add in part and denying in part to docket text (ndrS, COURT STAFF).

1
2
3
4
5

WOODALL LAW OFFICES
100 PINE STREET, SUITE 1250
SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA 94111
TELEPHONE: [phone]
FACSIMILE: [phone]
[e-mail]
KEVIN F. WOODALL, BAR NO. 180650
ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF, STARVONA HARRIS AND
THOSE SIMILARLY SITUATED

6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

11
12
13

STARVONA HARRIS, INDIVIDUALLY
AND ON BEHALF OF THOSE SIMILARLY
SITUATED,

PLAINTIFFS,

14
15
16

V.

BEST BUY STORES, L.P., A LIMITED
PARTNERSHIP,

17

DEFENDANT.

18

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

CASE NO. 3:15-CV-00657 HSG
STIPULATION TO EXTEND
DEADLINE FOR FILING AND
RESPONDING TO MOTION FOR
SUMMARY JUDGMENT; ORDER
THEREON

19
20

WHEREAS, at the May 19, 2015 Case Management Conference (“CMC”), the

21

parties informed the Court that: (a) they had not yet started discovery because the Rule 26

22

conference was held a short time earlier; and (b) if there were no discovery disputes and

23

the parties were able to receive all necessary discovery, they would be in a position to file

24

or defend against a motion for summary judgment related to Plaintiff’s individual claims

25

within in a few months of the CMC;

26

WHEREAS, based upon the foregoing, the Court set an August 19, 2015 deadline

27

for the parties to bring a summary judgment motion relating to Plaintiff’s individual

28

claims;
STIPULATION TO EXTEND DEADLINE; ORDER THEREON

1
2
3
4

WHEREAS, the parties have propounded and engaged in discovery directly after
the CMC;
WHEREAS, counsel for both parties were traveling and unavailable at different
times during July, 2015, which made it impossible to conduct depositions that month;

5

WHEREAS, the parties have had discovery disputes relating to written discovery

6

and depositions since the CMC. The parties are continuing to engage in meet and confer

7

discussions relating to Rule 30(b)(6) deposition topics and written discovery. The parties

8

may need to file a joint discovery brief with the Court to address certain issues. After the

9

issues are resolved, Plaintiff will need to take the Rule 30(b)(6) deposition; and

10

WHEREAS, the Parties need additional time to obtain the necessary discovery to

11

bring or defend against a motion for summary judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil

12

Procedure, Rule 56(d).

13

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED as follows:

14

(1) The deadline for both parties to file a motion for summary judgment is

15
16
17

extended from August 19, 2015 until October 19, 2015; and
(2) If a party files a motion for summary judgment prior to October 19, 2015, the
other party will have until November 2, 2015 to file opposition papers.

18
19

WOODALL LAW OFFICES
DATE: AUGUST 7, 2015

20
21

BY: /S/KEVIN F. WOODALL
KEVIN F. WOODALL
ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF, STARVONA
HARRIS AND SIMILARLY SITUATED
FORMER AND CURRENT EMPLOYEES OF
DEFENDANT

22
23
24
25
26
27
28

2
STIPULATION TO EXTEND DEADLINE; ORDER THEREON

1
2

MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP

DATE: AUGUST 7, 2015

3
4

BY: /S/BARBARA J. MILLER
BARBARA J. MILLER
ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANT BEST BUY
STORES, L.P.

5
6
7
8

ORDER

9
10

For good cause shown, the Court hereby orders that the deadline for Plaintiff to
11

respond to Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. No. 22) is November 2,
12

2015.
13
14

Dated: August 31, 2015
U.S. District Court Judge

15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

3
STIPULATION TO EXTEND DEADLINE; ORDER THEREON