Harris v. Best Buy Stores, L.P.
Filing
29
ORDER re 28 Stipulated Protective Order. Parties to file a declaration within 7 days to indicate whether they were using a model protective order or a modified protective order. Signed by Judge Kandis A. Westmore on 9/17/2015. (kawlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/17/2015)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
7
STARVONA HARRIS,
Case No. 15-cv-00657-HSG (KAW)
Plaintiff,
8
ORDER REGARDING PROPOSED
STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER
v.
9
10
BEST BUY STORES, L.P.,
Re: Dkt. No. 28
Defendant.
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
13
On September 16, 2015, the parties filed a stipulated protective order. They did not,
14
however, indicate whether they were using a model protective order or a modified protective order
15
as required by the Court’s Standing Order. (See Judge Westmore’s General Standing Order ¶ 11.)
16
Accordingly, the parties are ordered to submit, within 7 days of this order, (a) a declaration
17
stating that the proposed order is identical to one of the model orders, (b) a declaration explaining
18
each modification to the model order, along with a redline version comparing the proposed
19
protective order with the model order, or (c) a declaration explaining why use of one of the model
20
orders is not practicable.
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: September 17, 2015
______________________________________
KANDIS A. WESTMORE
United States Magistrate Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?