Whitecryption Corporation v. Arxan Technologies, Inc.
Filing
45
ORDER granting 44 STIPULATION to Continue Case Deadlines. Fact discovery cutoff: 7/15/2016. Dispositive motions to be heard by 11/9/2016. Pretrial Conference set for 1/23/2017 02:00 PM and Jury Trial set for 2/27/2017 08:30 AM, both in Courtroom 12, 19th Floor, San Francisco before Hon. William H. Orrick. Signed by Judge William H. Orrick on 12/21/2015. (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/21/2015)
1
2
3
4
5
MICHAEL T. JONES (SBN 290660)
mjones@goodwinprocter.com
GOODWIN PROCTER LLP
135 Commonwealth Drive
Menlo Park, California 94025-1105
Tel.: 650.752.3100
Fax.: 650.853.1038
Attorneys for Defendant/Counter-Claimant:
ARXAN TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
6
7
8
9
RAJIV DHARNIDHARKA (SBN 234756)
rajiv.dharnidharka@dlapiper.com
DLA PIPER LLP (US)
555 Mission Street, Suite 2400
San Francisco, CA 94105
Tel.: 415.836.2500
Fax.: 415.836.2501
10
11
Attorneys for Plaintiff/ CounterclaimDefendants: WHTIECRYPTION CORPORATION AND
INTERTRUST TECHNOLOGIES, CORPORATION
12
13
[ADDITIONAL COUNSEL LISTED IN SIGNATURE
BLOCK]
14
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
15
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
16
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
17
WHITECRYPTION CORPORATION,
18
Plaintiff,
19
20
v.
ARXAN TECHNOLOGIES, INC.,
Defendant.
21
22
ARXAN TECHNOLOGIES, INC.,
23
24
25
26
27
Case No. 3:15-CV-00754-WHO
STIPULATION AND
ORDER TO CONTINUE CASE
DEADLINES
Date:
Time:
Courtroom:
Judge:
N/A
N/A
02
Hon. William H. Orrick
450 Golden Gate Avenue
San Francisco, CA
Counter-Claimant,
v.
WHITECRYPTION CORPORATION; and
INTERTRUST TECHNOLOGIES
CORPORATION
Counter-Defendants.
28
STIPULATION & ORDER
TO CONTINUE CASE DEADLINES
CASE NO. 3:15-CV-00754-WHO
Plaintiff and cross-defendants whiteCryption Corporation (“whiteCryption”) and Intertrust
1
2
Technologies Corporation (“Intertrust”) and defendant and counterclaimant Arxan Technologies,
3
Inc. (“Arxan”) stipulate and agree as follows:
1.
On February 18, 2015, whiteCryption initiated the above-captioned action against
6
2.
Arxan answered and counterclaimed against whiteCryption and Intertrust on April
7
10, 2015.
8
3.
4
5
9
10
11
12
13
Arxan.
Between May and June 2015, the parties engaged in motion practice regarding the
counterclaims, and on June 18, 2015, the Court granted Intertrust’s motion to dismiss with leave to
amend.
4.
On June 17, 2015, the Court issued a Civil Pretrial Order setting the deadlines in
this action. ECF No. 35.
5.
From June through December 2015, the parties have cooperated on a phased
14
discovery effort to facilitate settlement discussions. The parties, for example, have exchanged
15
several document productions, retained software code comparison experts, and completed code
16
comparisons in an effort to identify and narrow issues for settlement discussions. Document
17
discovery, however, is not complete, nor have the parties yet taken any depositions, in favor of the
18
targeted approach described above in the lead up to a settlement discussion.
19
6.
On November 2, 2015, the Court granted the parties’ request for a settlement
20
conference with a magistrate judge and ordered that the parties appear for a conference on January
21
5, 2016.
22
7.
In light of the settlement conference and likely continued settlement discussions
23
after the conference if the parties are unable to reach complete resolution on January 5, 2016, the
24
parties agree that continuing all case deadlines by approximately ninety (90) days would assist in
25
the parties settlement efforts, as well as conserve the parties’ and the Court’s resources.
26
27
8.
Neither party has previously requested an extension or modification of any
deadlines in the Civil Pretrial Order.
28
1
STIPULATION AND ORDER
TO CONTINUE CASE DEADLINES
CASE NO. 3:15-CV-00754-WHO
1
2
Therefore, the parties stipulate and agree, subject to the court’s approval, that all case
deadlines be extended by approximately ninety (90) days as follows:
3
Current Deadline
Proposed Deadline
4
Deadline to amend/add parties
December 31, 2015
March 31, 2016
5
Fact discovery cutoff
April 15, 2016
July 15, 2016
6
Expert disclosure
April 29, 2016
July 29, 2016
7
Expert rebuttal
May 20, 2016
August 22, 2016
8
Expert discovery cutoff
June 10, 2016
September 12, 2016
9
Dispositive Motions heard by
August 10, 2016
November 9, 2016
Pretrial Conference
October 7, 2016
10
January 23, 2017 (or as the
11
Court’s calendar allows)
12
Trial (jury)
November 14, 2016
13
February 27, 2017 (or as the
Court’s calendar allows)
14
Respectfully submitted,
15
19
By: /s/Michael T. Jones
MICHAEL T. JONES (SBN 290660)
mjones@goodwinprocter.com
HONG-AN VU (SBN 266268)
hvu@goodwinprocter.com
APRIL SUN (SBN 291633)
asun@goodwinprocter.com
20
GOODWIN PROCTER LLP
21
Attorneys for Defendant/Counter-Claimant:
ARXAN TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
16
Dated: December 18, 2015
17
18
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
STIPULATION AND ORDER
TO CONTINUE CASE DEADLINES
CASE NO. 3:15-CV-00754-WHO
1
Respectfully submitted,
2
3
Dated: December 18, 2015
4
5
6
By: /s/Rajiv Dharnidharka
RAJIV DHARNIDHARKA
rajiv.dharnidharka@dlapiper.com
TODD NOONAN
todd.noonan@dlapiper.com
DEBORAH E. MCCRIMMON
deborah.mccrimmon@dlapiper.com
7
DLA PIPER, LLP (US)
8
Attorneys for Plaintiff and CounterclaimDEFENDANTS: WHTIECRYPTION CORPORATION
AND INTERTRUST TECHNOLOGIES, CORPORATION
9
10
11
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
12
13
December 21, 2015
Dated: ____________________
HON. WILLIAM H. ORRICK
UNITED STATED DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
STIPULATION AND ORDER
TO CONTINUE CASE DEADLINES
CASE NO. 3:15-CV-00754-WHO
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?