Whitecryption Corporation v. Arxan Technologies, Inc.

Filing 45

ORDER granting 44 STIPULATION to Continue Case Deadlines. Fact discovery cutoff: 7/15/2016. Dispositive motions to be heard by 11/9/2016. Pretrial Conference set for 1/23/2017 02:00 PM and Jury Trial set for 2/27/2017 08:30 AM, both in Courtroom 12, 19th Floor, San Francisco before Hon. William H. Orrick. Signed by Judge William H. Orrick on 12/21/2015. (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/21/2015)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 MICHAEL T. JONES (SBN 290660) mjones@goodwinprocter.com GOODWIN PROCTER LLP 135 Commonwealth Drive Menlo Park, California 94025-1105 Tel.: 650.752.3100 Fax.: 650.853.1038 Attorneys for Defendant/Counter-Claimant: ARXAN TECHNOLOGIES, INC. 6 7 8 9 RAJIV DHARNIDHARKA (SBN 234756) rajiv.dharnidharka@dlapiper.com DLA PIPER LLP (US) 555 Mission Street, Suite 2400 San Francisco, CA 94105 Tel.: 415.836.2500 Fax.: 415.836.2501 10 11 Attorneys for Plaintiff/ CounterclaimDefendants: WHTIECRYPTION CORPORATION AND INTERTRUST TECHNOLOGIES, CORPORATION 12 13 [ADDITIONAL COUNSEL LISTED IN SIGNATURE BLOCK] 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 15 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 16 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 17 WHITECRYPTION CORPORATION, 18 Plaintiff, 19 20 v. ARXAN TECHNOLOGIES, INC., Defendant. 21 22 ARXAN TECHNOLOGIES, INC., 23 24 25 26 27 Case No. 3:15-CV-00754-WHO STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE CASE DEADLINES Date: Time: Courtroom: Judge: N/A N/A 02 Hon. William H. Orrick 450 Golden Gate Avenue San Francisco, CA Counter-Claimant, v. WHITECRYPTION CORPORATION; and INTERTRUST TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION Counter-Defendants. 28 STIPULATION & ORDER TO CONTINUE CASE DEADLINES CASE NO. 3:15-CV-00754-WHO Plaintiff and cross-defendants whiteCryption Corporation (“whiteCryption”) and Intertrust 1 2 Technologies Corporation (“Intertrust”) and defendant and counterclaimant Arxan Technologies, 3 Inc. (“Arxan”) stipulate and agree as follows: 1. On February 18, 2015, whiteCryption initiated the above-captioned action against 6 2. Arxan answered and counterclaimed against whiteCryption and Intertrust on April 7 10, 2015. 8 3. 4 5 9 10 11 12 13 Arxan. Between May and June 2015, the parties engaged in motion practice regarding the counterclaims, and on June 18, 2015, the Court granted Intertrust’s motion to dismiss with leave to amend. 4. On June 17, 2015, the Court issued a Civil Pretrial Order setting the deadlines in this action. ECF No. 35. 5. From June through December 2015, the parties have cooperated on a phased 14 discovery effort to facilitate settlement discussions. The parties, for example, have exchanged 15 several document productions, retained software code comparison experts, and completed code 16 comparisons in an effort to identify and narrow issues for settlement discussions. Document 17 discovery, however, is not complete, nor have the parties yet taken any depositions, in favor of the 18 targeted approach described above in the lead up to a settlement discussion. 19 6. On November 2, 2015, the Court granted the parties’ request for a settlement 20 conference with a magistrate judge and ordered that the parties appear for a conference on January 21 5, 2016. 22 7. In light of the settlement conference and likely continued settlement discussions 23 after the conference if the parties are unable to reach complete resolution on January 5, 2016, the 24 parties agree that continuing all case deadlines by approximately ninety (90) days would assist in 25 the parties settlement efforts, as well as conserve the parties’ and the Court’s resources. 26 27 8. Neither party has previously requested an extension or modification of any deadlines in the Civil Pretrial Order. 28 1 STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE CASE DEADLINES CASE NO. 3:15-CV-00754-WHO 1 2 Therefore, the parties stipulate and agree, subject to the court’s approval, that all case deadlines be extended by approximately ninety (90) days as follows: 3 Current Deadline Proposed Deadline 4 Deadline to amend/add parties December 31, 2015 March 31, 2016 5 Fact discovery cutoff April 15, 2016 July 15, 2016 6 Expert disclosure April 29, 2016 July 29, 2016 7 Expert rebuttal May 20, 2016 August 22, 2016 8 Expert discovery cutoff June 10, 2016 September 12, 2016 9 Dispositive Motions heard by August 10, 2016 November 9, 2016 Pretrial Conference October 7, 2016 10 January 23, 2017 (or as the 11 Court’s calendar allows) 12 Trial (jury) November 14, 2016 13 February 27, 2017 (or as the Court’s calendar allows) 14 Respectfully submitted, 15 19 By: /s/Michael T. Jones MICHAEL T. JONES (SBN 290660) mjones@goodwinprocter.com HONG-AN VU (SBN 266268) hvu@goodwinprocter.com APRIL SUN (SBN 291633) asun@goodwinprocter.com 20 GOODWIN PROCTER LLP 21 Attorneys for Defendant/Counter-Claimant: ARXAN TECHNOLOGIES, INC. 16 Dated: December 18, 2015 17 18 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE CASE DEADLINES CASE NO. 3:15-CV-00754-WHO 1 Respectfully submitted, 2 3 Dated: December 18, 2015 4 5 6 By: /s/Rajiv Dharnidharka RAJIV DHARNIDHARKA rajiv.dharnidharka@dlapiper.com TODD NOONAN todd.noonan@dlapiper.com DEBORAH E. MCCRIMMON deborah.mccrimmon@dlapiper.com 7 DLA PIPER, LLP (US) 8 Attorneys for Plaintiff and CounterclaimDEFENDANTS: WHTIECRYPTION CORPORATION AND INTERTRUST TECHNOLOGIES, CORPORATION 9 10 11 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 12 13 December 21, 2015 Dated: ____________________ HON. WILLIAM H. ORRICK UNITED STATED DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3 STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE CASE DEADLINES CASE NO. 3:15-CV-00754-WHO

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?