Hudson v. Richmond Police Department

Filing 88

ORDER REFERRING PLAINTIFF TO FEDERAL PRO BONO PROJECT 84 87 . (Illston, Susan) (Filed on 3/3/2017) (Additional attachment(s) added on 3/3/2017: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service) (tfS, COURT STAFF).

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 TORIANO GERMAINE HUDSON, Plaintiff, 8 9 10 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 Case No. 15-cv-00787-SI ORDER REFERRING PLAINTIFF TO FEDERAL PRO BONO PROJECT v. Re: Dkt. Nos. 84, 87 DIAZ, et al., Defendants. 12 13 14 Plaintiff’s motion for appointment of counsel to represent him in this action is GRANTED. 15 (Dkt. Nos. 84, 87.) Plaintiff, having requested and being in need of counsel to assist him in this 16 matter, plaintiff is referred to the Federal Pro Bono Project in the manner set forth below so that an 17 attorney may be located for him: 18 (1) 19 20 21 22 23 The clerk shall forward to the Federal Pro Bono Project: (a) a copy of this order and (b) a memorandum outlining the facts and procedural posture of the action. (2) Upon an attorney being located to represent plaintiff, that attorney shall be appointed as counsel for plaintiff in this matter until further order of the court. (3) All proceedings in this action are stayed until four weeks from the date an attorney is appointed to represent plaintiff in this action. 24 Plaintiff’s motion at Docket No. 84 is ambiguous as to whether plaintiff wants an attorney 25 for this action or for some other action he wants to file. The court is not granting plaintiff’s 26 27 28 1 request for appointment of counsel to help him with some other unidentified action he may want 2 to file. Counsel is only being sought for this action. 3 4 5 6 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: March 3, 2017 ______________________________________ SUSAN ILLSTON United States District Judge 7 8 9 10 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?