Shenzhenshi Haitiecheng Science and Technology Co., Ltd. v. Rearden LLC et al

Filing 29

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 24 ADR Certification (ADR L.R. 3-5 b)of discussion of ADR options filed by Shenzhenshi Haitiecheng Science and Technology Co., Ltd. Signed by Judge Samuel Conti on 5/29/15. (dt, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/29/2015)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SHENZHENSHI HAITIECHENG
SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD.,
Plaintiff(s),
v.

CASE NO. 15-cv-00797 SC

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS

REARDEN, LLC; REARDEN MOVA, LLC;
MO2, LLC; and MOVA, LLC,
Defendant(s).
_____________________________________/
Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached the
following stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5:
The parties agree to participate in the following ADR process:
Court Processes:
Non-binding Arbitration (ADR L.R. 4)
Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) (ADR L.R. 5)
Mediation (ADR L.R. 6)
(Note: Parties who believe that an early settlement conference with a Magistrate Judge is
appreciably more likely to meet their needs than any other form of ADR must participate in an
ADR phone conference and may not file this form. They must instead file a Notice of Need for
ADR Phone Conference. See Civil Local Rule 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5)
Private Process:
Private ADR (please identify process and provider) ______________________
_____________________________________________________________________________
The parties agree to hold the ADR session by:
the presumptive deadline (The deadline is 90 days from the date of the order
referring the case to an ADR process unless otherwise ordered. )

other requested deadline: 90 days from the date of the Court’s order on Defendants’
anticipated Motion for Summary Judgment
Dated: May 22, 2015

/s/ Jon Michaelson
Attorney for Plaintiff

Dated: May 22, 2015

/s/ Ragesh K. Tangri
Attorney for Defendant

CONTINUE TO FOLLOWING PAGE

[PROPOSED] ORDER
X

The parties’ stipulation is adopted and IT IS SO ORDERED.
The parties’ stipulation is modified as follows, and IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: May 29, 2015

__________________________________
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

When filing this document in ECF, please be sure to use the appropriate Docket
Event, e.g., “Stipulation and Proposed Order Selecting Mediation.”

Rev. 12/11
Page 2 of 2