Shenzhenshi Haitiecheng Science and Technology Co., Ltd. v. Rearden LLC et al
Filing
293
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 291 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER WITHDRAWING 279 AND DEFINING OPERATIVE PLEADINGS filed by Mova, LLC, MO2, LLC, Rearden Mova, LLC, Rearden LLC. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on September 6, 2016. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/6/2016)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
KILPATRICK TOWNSEND & STOCKTON LLP
Jon Michaelson (Bar No. 83815)
jmichaelson@kilpatricktownsend.com
Scott Kolassa (Bar No. 294732)
skolassa@kilpatricktownsend.com
Frances B. Cox (Bar No. 133696)
ncox@kilpatricktownsend.com
1080 Marsh Road
Menlo Park, CA 94025
Telephone: (650) 326 2400
Facsimile: (650) 326 2422
KILPATRICK TOWNSEND & STOCKTON LLP
Holly Gaudreau (Bar No. 209114)
hgaudreau@kilpatricktownsend.com
Benjamin M. Kleinman-Green (Bar No. 261846)
bkleinman-green@kilpatricktownsend.com
Darius C. Samerotte (Bar No. 296252)
dsamerotte@kilpatricktownsend.com
Two Embarcadero Center, Suite 1900
San Francisco, CA 94111
Telephone: 415 576 0200
Facsimile: 415 576 0300
Attorneys for Plaintiff Counterclaim Defendant
SHENZHENSHI HAITIECHENG SCIENCE
AND TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD.
18
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
TURNER BOYD LLP
Karen I. Boyd (Bar No. 189808)
boyd@turnerboyd.com
Jennifer Seraphine (Bar No. 245463)
seraphine@turnerboyd.com
Zhuanjia Gu (Bar No. 244863)
gu@turnerboyd.com
702 Marshall Street, Suite 640
Redwood City, CA 94063
Telephone: (650) 521 5930
Facsimile: (650) 521 5931
Attorneys for Defendants
REARDEN, LLC, REARDEN MOVA,
LLC, MO2, LLC, MOVA, LLC
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
17
19
KERR & WAGSTAFFE LLP
James M. Wagstaffe (Bar No. 95535)
wagstaffe@kerrwagstaffe.com
Frank Busch (Bar No. 258288)
busch@kerrwagstaffe.com
101 Mission Street, 18th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94105–1727
Telephone: (415) 371 8500
Facsimile: (415) 371 0500
SHENZHENSHI HAITIECHENG SCIENCE
AND TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD.,
Plaintiff,
v.
REARDEN LLC, REARDEN MOVA, LLC,
MO2, LLC, and MOVA, LLC,
Case No. 3:15-cv-00797-JST (SK)
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER WITHDRAWING MOTION
TO DISMISS FILED BY NON-PARTY
VIRTUE GLOBAL HOLDINGS
LIMITED (D.I. 279) AND DEFINING
OPERATIVE PLEADINGS
Defendants.
_____________________________________
AND RELATED COUNTERCLAIMS.
27
28
______________________________________________________________________________
STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER
(CASE NO. 3:15-cv-00797-JST)
1
Plaintiff and Counterclaim Defendant Shenzhenshi Haitiecheng Science and Technology
2
Co., Ltd. (“SHST”), Non-Party Virtue Global Holdings Limited (“VGH”), and Defendants and
3
Counterclaim Plaintiffs Rearden, LLC, Rearden Mova, LLC, MO2, LLC, and MOVA, LLC
4
(collectively “Defendants”), by and through their respective counsel of record, in light of this
5
Court’s Order that “VGH is no longer a party to this case” (D.I. 282) hereby stipulate and agree
6
as follows:
7
1.
VGH withdraws VGH’s Motion to Dismiss Defendants’ Fraudulent Transfer
8
Counterclaim (D.I. 279). This withdrawal is without prejudice to re-filing if Defendants bring a
9
fraudulent transfer claim or counterclaim against VGH.
10
2.
D.I. 100, Defendants’ Answer and Amended Counterclaims filed against SHST
11
(originally filed in redacted form as D.I. 95 on March 18, 2016) are the operative counterclaims
12
in this matter.
13
3.
D.I. 111, “Answer to Ownership Allegations in Amended Counterclaim,” is the
14
operative response to the unstayed operative counterclaims as to SHST only. It is deemed not a
15
response to D.I. 95/100 on behalf of VGH.
16
4.
This stipulation and agreement does not alter any rights of SHST.
17
18
SHST, VGH, and Defendants respectfully request an order pursuant to this stipulation.
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
Dated: September 2, 2016
KILPATRICK TOWNSEND & STOCKTON LLP
By: /s/ Benjamin M. Kleinman-Green
BENJAMIN M. KLEINMAN-GREEN
Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counterclaim Defendant
SHENZHENSHI HAITIECHENG SCIENCE AND
TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD. and Non-Party
VIRTUE GLOBAL HOLDINGS LIMITED
26
27
28
1
______________________________________________________________________________
STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER (CASE NO. 3:15-cv-00797-JST)
1
2
3
4
Dated: September 2, 2016
TURNER BOYD LLP
By:
/s/ Karen I. Boyd
KAREN I. BOYD
Attorneys for Defendants
REARDEN, LLC, REARDEN MOVA, LLC,
MO2, LLC, and MOVA, LLC
5
6
7
8
ATTESTATION REGARDING SIGNATURES
Pursuant to Local Rule 5-1(i)(3) regarding signatures, I attest under penalty of perjury
that I have on file permission to sign for VGH and SHST’s counsel indicated by a conformed
signature within this e-filed document.
9
/s/ Karen I. Boyd
Karen I. Boyd
10
11
12
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
13
14
15
16
September 6, 2016
Dated: _________________________
_________________________
THE HONORABLE JON. S. TIGAR
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
______________________________________________________________________________
STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER (CASE NO. 3:15-cv-00797-JST)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?