Shenzhenshi Haitiecheng Science and Technology Co., Ltd. v. Rearden LLC et al

Filing 42

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME as to 35 MOTION for Summary Judgment , 37 MOTION for Summary Judgment on Defendants' Counterclaim for Declaratory Relief (Related DN 34 and DN 36). Responses due by 7/31/2015. Replies due by 8/14/2015. Signed by Judge Samuel Conti on 07/17/2015. (tmiS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/17/2015)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16

KILPATRICK TOWNSEND & STOCKTON LLP
JON MICHAELSON (SBN 83815)
[e-mail]
SCOTT E. KOLASSA (SBN 294732)
[e-mail]
FRANCES B. COX (SBN 133696)
[e-mail]
1080 Marsh Road
Menlo Park, CA 94025
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 650 326 2422
Attorneys for Plaintiff
SHENZHENSHI HAITIECHENG SCIENCE
AND TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD.
DURIE TANGRI LLP
RAGESH K. TANGRI (SBN 159477)
[e-mail]
JOSEPH C. GRATZ (SBN 240676)
[e-mail]
ZAC A. COX (SBN 283535)
[e-mail]
217 Leidesdorff Street
San Francisco, CA 94111
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile:
415-236-6300
Attorneys for Defendants
REARDEN, LLC, REARDEN MOVA, LLC,
MO2, LLC, MOVA, LLC

17

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
Case No. 3:15-cv-00797-SC
SHENZHENSHI HAITIECHENG SCIENCE
AND TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD.,
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
TO EXTEND TIME
Plaintiff,
v.
REARDEN LLC; REARDEN MOVA, LLC,
MO2, LLC, MOVA, LLC,

Date:
Time:
Ctrm:
Judge:

August 28, 2015
10:00 a.m.
1, 17th Floor
Honorable Samuel Conti

Defendants.

26
27
28

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND TIME / CASE NO. 3:15-CV-00797-SC

1

At the May 29, 2015 Case Management Conference, as confirmed in the minute entry that issued

2

following that conference (Dkt. No. 28), the Court set the hearing on Defendants’ Motion for Summary

3

Judgment for August 28, 2015. The Court also approved the schedule set forth in the parties’ Joint Case

4

Management Statement (Dkt. No. 26), where the parties agreed to the following schedule for briefing:

5

May 22, 2015 Joint Case
Management Statement, p. 13

6
7

Plaintiff’s Opposition to Defendant’s
Motion for Summary Judgment

July 31, 2015

8

Defendants’ Reply in Support of its Motion
for Summary Judgment

August 14, 2015

9
Defendants served Plaintiff with Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment on Defendants’

10
11

Counterclaim for Declaratory Relief on June 1, 2015, and filed that motion on June 10, 2015. (Dkt. No.

12

35.) Pursuant to Local Rule 6-1(b), Plaintiff Shenzhenshi Haitiecheng Science And Technology Co., Ltd.

13

and Defendants Rearden LLC; Rearden Mova, LLC, MO2, LLC, Mova, LLC, by and through their

14

respective attorneys, hereby stipulate to extend the deadline to file an opposition and reply to Defendants’

15

Motion for Summary Judgment on Defendants’ Counterclaim for Declaratory Relief to the dates they

16

agreed upon in their Joint Case Management Statement.

17

Current deadline
in ECF

18
19

Plaintiff’s Opposition to Defendant’s
Motion for Summary Judgment

20

Defendants’ Reply in Support of its Motion
for Summary Judgment

21
22

Proposed deadline (per the
parties’ May 22, 2015 Joint
Case Management Statement)

June 24, 2015

July 31, 2015

July 1, 2015

August 14, 2015

The parties respectfully request an order pursuant to this stipulation.

23

//

24

//

25

//

26

//

27

//

28
2
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND TIME / CASE NO. 3:15-CV-00797-SC

1

Dated: July 14, 2015

KILPATRICK TOWNSEND & STOCKTON LLP

2
By:

/s/ Frances B. Cox
JON MICHAELSON
SCOTT E. KOLASSA
FRANCES B. COX

3
4
5

Attorneys for Plaintiff
SHENZHENSHI HAITIECHENG SCIENCE
AND TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD.

6
7
8

Dated: July 14, 2015

DURIE TANGRI LLP

9
By:

/s/ Zac A. Cox
RAGESH K. TANGRI
JOSEPH C. GRATZ
ZAC A. COX

10
11
12

Attorneys for Defendants
REARDEN, LLC, REARDEN MOVA, LLC, MO2,
LLC, MOVA, LLC

13
14
15

S

________________________________________
Honorable Samuel Conti
United States District Judge

R NIA

18

07/17/2015
Dated:__________________

UNIT
ED

17

S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA

RT
U
O

16

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

19
el Conti

NO

amu
Judge S

22

A

H

ER

LI

RT

21

FO

20

N

F
D IS T IC T O
R

C

23
24
25
26
27
28
3
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND TIME / CASE NO. 3:15-CV-00797-SC