Shenzhenshi Haitiecheng Science and Technology Co., Ltd. v. Rearden LLC et al
Filing
74
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 72 STIPULATION WITH [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR PLAINTIFF TO RESPOND TO DEFENDANTS AMENDED COUNTERCLAIMS filed by Shenzhenshi Haitiecheng Science and Technology Co., Ltd.. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on February 24, 2016. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/24/2016)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
KILPATRICK TOWNSEND & STOCKTON LLP
JON MICHAELSON (SBN 83815)
jmichaelson@kilpatricktownsend.com
SCOTT KOLASSA (SBN 294732)
skolassa@kilpatricktownsend.com
FRANCES B. COX (SBN 133696)
ncox@kilpatricktownsend.com
1080 Marsh Road
Menlo Park, CA 94025
Telephone: 650 326 2400
Facsimile: 650 326 2422
Attorneys for Plaintiff SHENZHENSHI HAITIECHENG
SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD.
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
11
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
SHENZHENSHI HAITIECHENG SCIENCE
AND TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD., a People’s
Republic of China corporation,
Plaintiff,
v.
REARDEN, LLC, a California Limited
Liability Company; REARDEN MOVA,
LLC, a California Limited Liability
Company; MO2, LLC, a California Limited
Liability Company; and MOVA, LLC, a
California Limited Liability Company,
Case No. 4:15-cv-00797 JST
STIPULATION EXTENDING
TIME FOR PLAINTIFF TO RESPOND
TO DEFENDANTS’ AMENDED
COUNTERCLAIMS AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER THEREON
Judge:
Honorable Jon S. Tigar
Action Filed: February 20, 2015
Defendants.
21
22
Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 6-1(b), Plaintiff Shenzhenshi Haitiecheng Science and
23
Technology Co., Ltd. (“Plaintiff”) and Defendants’ Rearden, LLC, Rearden Mova, LLC, MO2,
24
LLC, and Mova, LLC (collectively “Defendants”) stipulate and agree to extend the time by which
25
Plaintiff has to answer and otherwise respond to Defendants’ Amended Counterclaims.
26
STIPULATION
27
WHEREAS, Plaintiff filed this action on February 20, 2015;
28
WHEREAS, Defendants served their Answer and Amended Counterclaims on February 12,
STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME FOR PLAINTIFF TO RESPOND TO DEFENDANTS’
AMENDED COUNTERCLAIMS; CASE NO. 4:15-CV-00797 JST
-1-
1
2
3
4
2016;
WHEREAS, Plaintiff is required to answer or otherwise respond to Defendants’
Counterclaims by February 26, 2016;
WHEREAS, at the request of Plaintiff, Defendants and Plaintiff stipulate and agree that
5
Plaintiff may have an extension until March 14, 2016 to answer or otherwise respond to
6
Defendants’ Counterclaims;
7
8
9
WHEREAS, this extension of time will not alter the date of any event or deadline already
fixed by the Court;
ACCORDINGLY, Plaintiff and Defendants hereby stipulate to an extension of time to
10
March 14, 2016 for Plaintiff to answer or otherwise respond to Defendants’ Amended
11
Counterclaims.
12
13
IT IS SO STIPULATED, THROUGH COUNSEL OF RECORD.
Dated: February 23, 2016
Respectfully submitted,
KILPATRICK TOWNSEND & STOCKTON LLP
14
15
By: /s/ Scott Kolassa
SCOTT KOLASSA
16
17
Attorneys for Plaintiff SHENZHENSHI
HAITIECHENG SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
CO., LTD.
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
Dated: February 23, 2016
Respectfully submitted,
TURNER BOYD LLP
By: /s/ Jennifer Seraphine
KAREN I. BOYD
JENNIFER SERAPHINE
ZHUANJIA GU
Attorneys for Defendants REARDEN, LLC,
REARDEN MOVA, LLC, MO2, LLC, and
MOVA, LLC
28
STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME FOR PLAINTIFF TO RESPOND TO DEFENDANTS’
AMENDED COUNTERCLAIMS; CASE NO. 4:15-CV-00797 JST
-2-
8
ER
R NIA
n
J u d ge J o
H
7
RT
6
NO
5
S . Ti ga r
FO
4
ED
Hon. Jon S.ROV
APP Tigar
A
3
__________________________
LI
Dated: February 24, 2016
UNIT
ED
2
S
IT IS SO ORDERED.
RT
U
O
1
ISTRIC
ES D
TC
T
TA
N
F
D IS T IC T O
R
C
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME FOR PLAINTIFF TO RESPOND TO DEFENDANTS’
AMENDED COUNTERCLAIMS; CASE NO. 4:15-CV-00797 JST
-3-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?