Shenzhenshi Haitiecheng Science and Technology Co., Ltd. v. Rearden LLC et al

Filing 83

SCHEDULING ORDER. Deadline to add parties or amend the pleadings 3/18/2016. Fact discovery cut-off 6/3/2016. Expert discovery cut-off 7/22/2016. Deadline to file dispositive motions 8/22/2016. Pretrial conference statement due 11/1/2016. Fin al Pretrial Conference set for 11/10/2016 at 1:30 PM in Courtroom 2, 4th Floor, Oakland. Jury Trial set for 12/5/2016 at 8:30 AM in Courtroom 9, 19th Floor, San Francisco before Hon. Jon S. Tigar. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on March 4, 2016. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/4/2016)

1
2
3
4
5

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

6

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

7

9

SHENZHENSHI HAITIECHENG
SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY CO.,
LTD.,

Case No. 15-cv-00797-JST

Plaintiff,

8

SCHEDULING ORDER

10
v.

United States District Court
Northern District of California

11
12

REARDEN LLC, et al.,
Defendants.

13
14
The Court hereby sets the following case deadlines pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil
15
Procedure 16 and Civil Local Rule 16-10:
16
Event

17

Deadline

18

Deadline to add parties or amend the pleadings

March 18, 2016

19

Fact discovery cut-off

June 3, 2016

Expert discovery cut-off

July 22, 2016

Deadline to file dispositive motions

August 22, 2016

Pretrial conference statement due

November 1, 2016

Pretrial conference

November 10, 2016
at 1:30 p.m.

Trial

December 5, 2016 at
8:30 a.m.

20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

1
2
3

Counsel may not modify these dates without leave of court. The parties shall comply with
the Court’s standing orders, which are available at cand.uscourts.gov/jstorders.
The parties must take all necessary steps to conduct discovery, compel discovery, hire

4

counsel, retain experts, and manage their calendars so that they can complete discovery in a timely

5

manner and appear at trial on the noticed and scheduled dates. All counsel must arrange their

6

calendars to accommodate these dates, or arrange to substitute or associate in counsel who can.

7

Trial dates set by this Court should be regarded as firm. Requests for continuance are
disfavored. The Court will not consider any event subsequently scheduled by a party, party-

9

controlled witness, expert or attorney that conflicts with the above trial date as good cause to grant

10

a continuance. The Court will not consider the pendency of settlement discussions as good cause

11
United States District Court
Northern District of California

8

to grant a continuance.

12
13

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: March 4, 2016

14
15

_______________________________________

16

JON S. TIGAR
United States District Judge

17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2