Loop AI Labs, Inc. v. Gatti et al

Filing 277

ORDER re 274 Letter filed by Loop AI Labs Inc. Signed by Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu on 10/21/2015. (dmrlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/21/2015)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

8

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9
10

LOOP AI LABS INC,

Case No. 15-cv-00798-HSG (DMR)

Plaintiff,
11
ORDER ON PLAINTIFF’S DISCOVERY
LETTER

United States District Court
Northern District of California

v.
12
13

ANNA GATTI, et al.,

Re: Dkt. No. 274

Defendants.
14
15

On September 24, 2015, the court denied Defendant Gatti’s motion for a protective order

16

as to five subpoenas issued by Plaintiff. The court suspended operation of the subpoenas pending

17

resolution of the parties’ dispute and ordered the parties to comply with the court’s procedure for

18

resolution of discovery disputes. [Docket No. 212.] On October 16, 2015, the court denied the

19

“joint letter” filed by Plaintiff and Defendant Gatti regarding the subpoenas (Docket No. 241) on

20

the grounds that the parties had failed to comply with the court’s Standing Order by meeting and

21

conferring about their disputes.

22

The court has now received Plaintiff’s October 19, 2015 letter seeking clarification

23

regarding the operability of five subpoenas to which Defendant Gatti objected. The court’s

24

September 24, 2015 order remains in place. The parties must meet and confer in good faith in

25

accordance with the court’s Standing Order and submit a joint letter regarding any remaining

26

disputes. The five subpoenas remain suspended pending resolution of the parties’ disputes.

27

However, the order suspending compliance with the subpoenas applies only to those portions of

28

the subpoenas to which Defendant Gatti objected. The recipients of the subpoenas shall promptly

7
8
9
10
11
United States District Court
Northern District of California

FO

H

ER

LI

RT

6

______________________________________
. Ryu
onna M
Judge D
Donna M. Ryu
United States Magistrate Judge

NO

5

Dated: October 21, 2015

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2

A

4

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DERED

O OR
IT IS S

R NIA

2
3

S

UNIT
ED

respond to the non-objectionable portions of the subpoenas.

RT
U
O

1

S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA

N

F
D IS T IC T O
R

C