Loop AI Labs, Inc. v. Gatti et al

Filing 438

Order by Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu on 428 Discovery Letter Brief re Plaintiff's Interrogatory Response.(dmrlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/2/2016)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 LOOP AI LABS INC, Case No. 15-cv-00798-HSG (DMR) Plaintiff, 8 v. 9 10 ANNA GATTI, et al., Defendants. ORDER ON 2/22/16 DISCOVERY LETTER RE PLAINTIFF’S INTERROGATORY RESPONSE Re: Dkt. No. 428 12 On February 22, 2016, Defendant Almawave USA, Inc. (“Almawave”) filed a discovery 13 letter seeking to compel a response by Plaintiff Loop AI Labs Inc. (“Loop”) to Interrogatory No. 14 8. [Docket No. 428.] The letter states that Loop refused to participate in a joint discovery letter. 15 The court’s process requires that parties file discovery letters no more than five business days after 16 the mandatory meet and confer session, unless otherwise ordered by the court. [Docket No. 401.] 17 According to Almawave, the parties met and conferred on February 12 and 19, 2016. Therefore, 18 Loop was required to file its responsive letter by February 26, 2016. Loop has not responded. 19 Almawave’s motion is therefore granted as unopposed. Loop shall serve an amended response to 20 Interrogatory No. 8 by March 9, 2016. 27 28 S R NIA FO J ER H 26 RT 25 ______________________________________ Donna M. Ryu M. Ryu Unitedudge Donna States Magistrate Judge NO 24 Dated: March 2, 2016 D RDERE OO IT IS S LI 23 IT IS SO ORDERED. A 22 S DISTRICT TE C TA RT U O 21 UNIT ED United States District Court Northern District of California 11 N F D IS T IC T O R C

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?