Loop AI Labs, Inc. v. Gatti et al
Filing
438
Order by Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu on 428 Discovery Letter Brief re Plaintiff's Interrogatory Response.(dmrlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/2/2016)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
7
LOOP AI LABS INC,
Case No. 15-cv-00798-HSG (DMR)
Plaintiff,
8
v.
9
10
ANNA GATTI, et al.,
Defendants.
ORDER ON 2/22/16 DISCOVERY
LETTER RE PLAINTIFF’S
INTERROGATORY RESPONSE
Re: Dkt. No. 428
12
On February 22, 2016, Defendant Almawave USA, Inc. (“Almawave”) filed a discovery
13
letter seeking to compel a response by Plaintiff Loop AI Labs Inc. (“Loop”) to Interrogatory No.
14
8. [Docket No. 428.] The letter states that Loop refused to participate in a joint discovery letter.
15
The court’s process requires that parties file discovery letters no more than five business days after
16
the mandatory meet and confer session, unless otherwise ordered by the court. [Docket No. 401.]
17
According to Almawave, the parties met and conferred on February 12 and 19, 2016. Therefore,
18
Loop was required to file its responsive letter by February 26, 2016. Loop has not responded.
19
Almawave’s motion is therefore granted as unopposed. Loop shall serve an amended response to
20
Interrogatory No. 8 by March 9, 2016.
27
28
S
R NIA
FO
J
ER
H
26
RT
25
______________________________________
Donna M. Ryu M. Ryu
Unitedudge Donna
States Magistrate Judge
NO
24
Dated: March 2, 2016
D
RDERE
OO
IT IS S
LI
23
IT IS SO ORDERED.
A
22
S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
RT
U
O
21
UNIT
ED
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
N
F
D IS T IC T O
R
C
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?