Loop AI Labs, Inc. v. Gatti et al

Filing 527

ORDER re 521 Discovery Letter Brieffor Leave to File Unilateral Letter Brief to Compel Compliance with Order Re: Deposition of Roberto Pieraccini filed by Almawave USA Inc. Signed by Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu on 03/25/2016. (dmrlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/25/2016)

1
2
3
4
5
6

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

8
9

LOOP AI LABS INC,

Case No. 15-cv-00798-HSG (DMR)

Plaintiff,
10
v.

United States District Court
Northern District of California

11
12

ANNA GATTI, et al.,
Defendants.

ORDER RE ADMINISTRATIVE
MOTION RE DEPOSITION OF
ROBERTO PIERACCINI
Re: Dkt. No. 521

13
14

The court has received Defendant Almawave USA, Inc.’s (“Almawave”) administrative

15

motion for leave to file a unilateral letter brief to compel Plaintiff Loop AI Labs Inc.’s compliance

16

with the court’s March 22, 2016 order regarding the deposition of Roberto Pieraccini (Docket No.

17

511). [Docket No. 521.] In the March 22, 2016 order, the court ordered Plaintiff to produce

18

Pieraccini for up to three hours of deposition at a location convenient to the witness. The court

19

will rule on Almawave’s administration upon completion of the briefing. See Civ. L.R. 7-11(b)

20

(any opposition to a motion for administrative relief due four days after the motion is filed).

21

The court notes that counsel has not sought or obtained a stay of the March 22, 2016 order

22

or any other discovery orders by the undersigned. Accordingly, counsel are on notice that all

23

parties must comply with the undersigned’s orders unless and until they are relieved from such

24

obligations by court order. See, e.g., Verizon Cal. Inc. v. OnlineNIC, Inc., 647 F. Supp. 2d 1110,

25

1116 (N.D. Cal. 2009) (“a party may not disregard the clear terms of a court order, even if that

26

party believes the order to be misguided, mistaken, or otherwise incorrect.”); see also Chapman v.

27

Pac. Tel. & Tel. Co., 613 F.2d 193, 197 (9th Cir. 1979) (“An attorney who believes a court order

28

is erroneous is not relieved of the duty to obey it.”). Any party that fails to comply with the

undersigned’s orders is subject to sanctions.

S

FO

ER

H

7
8
9
10
11
United States District Court
Northern District of California

R NIA

______________________________________
Donna M.na M. Ryu
n Ryu
United e Do Magistrate Judge
dg States
Ju

RT

6

Dated: March 25, 2016

DERED

O OR
IT IS S

NO

5

IT IS SO ORDERED.

LI

4

UNIT
ED

3

RT
U
O

2

S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2

A

1

N

D IS T IC T
R

OF

C