Loop AI Labs, Inc. v. Gatti et al
Filing
572
Order by Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu denying 568 Emergency Application. (dmrlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/5/2016)
1
2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
3
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
4
5
LOOP AI LABS INC,
Case No. 15-cv-00798-HSG (DMR)
Plaintiff,
6
v.
ORDER DENYING IQSYSTEM, INC'S
EMERGENCY APPLICATION
7
8
ANNA GATTI, et al.,
Re: Dkt. No. 568
Defendants.
9
10
The court has received Defendant IQSystem, Inc.’s emergency application regarding this
week’s deposition schedule and Plaintiff Loop AI Labs Inc.’s response thereto. [Docket Nos. 568,
12
570.] IQSystem, Inc. apparently makes the application on behalf of counsel for Defendant Gatti.
13
In the application, IQSystem, Inc. represents that counsel for Gatti is unavailable for depositions
14
this week because he is on vacation and that his associate is also unavailable this week. It seeks
15
the court’s permission to conduct the remaining depositions during the week of April 11, 2016.
16
The parties have inundated the court with discovery disputes in February and March 2016
17
leading up to the March 29, 2016 fact discovery deadline. In managing this deluge, the court has
18
ordered the parties to conduct certain depositions during the days immediately following the
19
March 29, 2016 deadline so as not to further delay the completion of fact discovery (see Docket
20
No. 526). All of this activity put the parties on fair notice that the weeks surrounding the fact
21
discovery cutoff would be crunch time. A quick review of the docket demonstrates that anyone
22
who scheduled time off during this critical period did so at his or her peril. [See, e.g., Docket Nos.
23
515, 516.] The court also notes that Gatti is represented by a firm that employs 17 lawyers,
24
according to its website. IQSystem, Inc.’s application on behalf of Gatti is denied.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
ERED
RT
R NIA
FO
NO
28
O ORD
IT IS S
______________________________________
Donna M. Ryu u
Ry
UnitedgStatesaMagistrate Judge
nn M.
ud e Do
J
H
ER
LI
27
Dated: April 5, 2016
A
26
ISTRIC
ES D
TC
AT
T
RT
U
O
S
25
UNIT
ED
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
N
F
D IS T IC T O
R
C
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?