Loop AI Labs, Inc. v. Gatti et al

Filing 623

Order by Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu denying 580 Administrative Motion for Leave to File Motion to Quash.(dmrlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/26/2016)

1
2
3
4

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

5

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

6
7

LOOP AI LABS INC,

Case No. 15-cv-00798-HSG (DMR)

Plaintiff,
8
v.
9
10

ANNA GATTI, et al.,
Defendants.

ORDER DENYING ADMINISTRATIVE
MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE
MOTION TO QUASH
Re: Dkt. No. 580

12

Fact discovery in this matter closed on March 29, 2016. On April 6, 2016, Defendant

13

IQSystem, Inc. (“IQS”) filed an administrative motion for leave to file a unilateral letter brief

14

regarding its motion to quash subpoenas issued by Plaintiff Loop AI Labs Inc. to third parties

15

American Express Company, U.S. Bancorp, Wells Fargo & Company, and The Pike Company,

16

Inc. [Docket No. 580.] Plaintiff opposes the motion. [Docket No. 600.] On April 20, 2016,

17

Plaintiff filed the four subpoenas at issue and their proofs of service in accordance with a court

18

order. [Docket Nos. 613, 616.]

19

Plaintiff served its subpoena to The Pike Company, Inc. on March 30, 2016, and the
subpoena commanded the recipient to produce documents on April 15, 2016. Accordingly, the

21

subpoena to The Pike Company, Inc. is unenforceable pursuant to Civil Local Rule 37-3. Civil

22

Local Rule 37-3 also provides that all discovery motions must be filed within seven days of the

23

close of discovery. Since IQS filed its administrative motion on April 6, 2016, eight days after the

24

close of discovery, it is untimely and therefore denied.

R NIA

ERED

______________________________________
Donna M. Ryuna M. Ryu
on
Judg D
United StateseMagistrate Judge
FO

RT

28

O ORD

IT IS S

NO

27

Dated: April 26, 2016

H

ER

LI

26

IT IS SO ORDERED.

A

25

ISTRIC
ES D
TC
AT
T

RT
U
O

S

20

UNIT
ED

United States District Court
Northern District of California

11

N

F
D IS T IC T O
R

C