Loop AI Labs, Inc. v. Gatti et al
Filing
623
Order by Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu denying 580 Administrative Motion for Leave to File Motion to Quash.(dmrlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/26/2016)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
7
LOOP AI LABS INC,
Case No. 15-cv-00798-HSG (DMR)
Plaintiff,
8
v.
9
10
ANNA GATTI, et al.,
Defendants.
ORDER DENYING ADMINISTRATIVE
MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE
MOTION TO QUASH
Re: Dkt. No. 580
12
Fact discovery in this matter closed on March 29, 2016. On April 6, 2016, Defendant
13
IQSystem, Inc. (“IQS”) filed an administrative motion for leave to file a unilateral letter brief
14
regarding its motion to quash subpoenas issued by Plaintiff Loop AI Labs Inc. to third parties
15
American Express Company, U.S. Bancorp, Wells Fargo & Company, and The Pike Company,
16
Inc. [Docket No. 580.] Plaintiff opposes the motion. [Docket No. 600.] On April 20, 2016,
17
Plaintiff filed the four subpoenas at issue and their proofs of service in accordance with a court
18
order. [Docket Nos. 613, 616.]
19
Plaintiff served its subpoena to The Pike Company, Inc. on March 30, 2016, and the
subpoena commanded the recipient to produce documents on April 15, 2016. Accordingly, the
21
subpoena to The Pike Company, Inc. is unenforceable pursuant to Civil Local Rule 37-3. Civil
22
Local Rule 37-3 also provides that all discovery motions must be filed within seven days of the
23
close of discovery. Since IQS filed its administrative motion on April 6, 2016, eight days after the
24
close of discovery, it is untimely and therefore denied.
R NIA
ERED
______________________________________
Donna M. Ryuna M. Ryu
on
Judg D
United StateseMagistrate Judge
FO
RT
28
O ORD
IT IS S
NO
27
Dated: April 26, 2016
H
ER
LI
26
IT IS SO ORDERED.
A
25
ISTRIC
ES D
TC
AT
T
RT
U
O
S
20
UNIT
ED
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
N
F
D IS T IC T O
R
C
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?