Loop AI Labs, Inc. v. Gatti et al

Filing 623

Order by Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu denying 580 Administrative Motion for Leave to File Motion to Quash.(dmrlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/26/2016)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 LOOP AI LABS INC, Case No. 15-cv-00798-HSG (DMR) Plaintiff, 8 v. 9 10 ANNA GATTI, et al., Defendants. ORDER DENYING ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE MOTION TO QUASH Re: Dkt. No. 580 12 Fact discovery in this matter closed on March 29, 2016. On April 6, 2016, Defendant 13 IQSystem, Inc. (“IQS”) filed an administrative motion for leave to file a unilateral letter brief 14 regarding its motion to quash subpoenas issued by Plaintiff Loop AI Labs Inc. to third parties 15 American Express Company, U.S. Bancorp, Wells Fargo & Company, and The Pike Company, 16 Inc. [Docket No. 580.] Plaintiff opposes the motion. [Docket No. 600.] On April 20, 2016, 17 Plaintiff filed the four subpoenas at issue and their proofs of service in accordance with a court 18 order. [Docket Nos. 613, 616.] 19 Plaintiff served its subpoena to The Pike Company, Inc. on March 30, 2016, and the subpoena commanded the recipient to produce documents on April 15, 2016. Accordingly, the 21 subpoena to The Pike Company, Inc. is unenforceable pursuant to Civil Local Rule 37-3. Civil 22 Local Rule 37-3 also provides that all discovery motions must be filed within seven days of the 23 close of discovery. Since IQS filed its administrative motion on April 6, 2016, eight days after the 24 close of discovery, it is untimely and therefore denied. R NIA ERED ______________________________________ Donna M. Ryuna M. Ryu on Judg D United StateseMagistrate Judge FO RT 28 O ORD IT IS S NO 27 Dated: April 26, 2016 H ER LI 26 IT IS SO ORDERED. A 25 ISTRIC ES D TC AT T RT U O S 20 UNIT ED United States District Court Northern District of California 11 N F D IS T IC T O R C

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?