Loop AI Labs, Inc. v. Gatti et al
Filing
850
ORDER to Provide Information re Plaintiff's Compliance with Discovery Order # 640 . Signed by Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu on 07/21/2016. (dmrlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/21/2016)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
7
LOOP AI LABS INC,
Case No. 15-cv-00798-HSG (DMR)
Plaintiff,
8
v.
9
10
ANNA GATTI, et al.,
Defendants.
ORDER TO PROVIDE INFORMATION
RE PLAINTIFF'S COMPLIANCE WITH
MAY 3, 2016 DISCOVERY ORDER
(DOCKET NO. 640)
12
On May 3, 2016, the court issued an order on Defendant Almawave USA, Inc.’s
13
(“Almawave”) motions to compel. [Docket No. 640.] In the May 3, 2016 order, the court ordered
14
Plaintiff Loop AI Labs Inc. to supplement its responses to Almawave’s interrogatory nos. 3, 5, 7,
15
and 8 within seven days of the date of the order, which was May 10, 2016. The court also ordered
16
Plaintiff to amend its responses and/or produce all documents responsive to Almawave’s requests
17
for production (“RFPs”) nos. 1, 4-11, 14-16, 31, and 33 by the same deadline.
18
By no later than July 26, 2016, Plaintiff shall file a statement in which it states, without
19
argument, whether it served Almawave with supplemental and/or amended responses to each of
20
the foregoing interrogatories and RFPs by the court-imposed deadline of May 10, 2016. If
21
Plaintiff answers “yes” with respect to any of the interrogatories and RFPs, it shall attach a copy
22
of the supplemental and/or amended response that it served along with a proof of service.
R NIA
Judge D
H
ER
FO
RT
28
onna M
NO
27
D
RDERE
IS SO O
IT
______________________________________
Donna M. Ryu
United States Magistrate Judge
. Ryu
LI
26
Dated: July 21, 2016
A
25
IT IS SO ORDERED.
S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
RT
U
O
24
S
23
UNIT
ED
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
N
F
D IS T IC T O
R
C
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?