Loop AI Labs, Inc. v. Gatti et al

Filing 850

ORDER to Provide Information re Plaintiff's Compliance with Discovery Order # 640 . Signed by Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu on 07/21/2016. (dmrlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/21/2016)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 LOOP AI LABS INC, Case No. 15-cv-00798-HSG (DMR) Plaintiff, 8 v. 9 10 ANNA GATTI, et al., Defendants. ORDER TO PROVIDE INFORMATION RE PLAINTIFF'S COMPLIANCE WITH MAY 3, 2016 DISCOVERY ORDER (DOCKET NO. 640) 12 On May 3, 2016, the court issued an order on Defendant Almawave USA, Inc.’s 13 (“Almawave”) motions to compel. [Docket No. 640.] In the May 3, 2016 order, the court ordered 14 Plaintiff Loop AI Labs Inc. to supplement its responses to Almawave’s interrogatory nos. 3, 5, 7, 15 and 8 within seven days of the date of the order, which was May 10, 2016. The court also ordered 16 Plaintiff to amend its responses and/or produce all documents responsive to Almawave’s requests 17 for production (“RFPs”) nos. 1, 4-11, 14-16, 31, and 33 by the same deadline. 18 By no later than July 26, 2016, Plaintiff shall file a statement in which it states, without 19 argument, whether it served Almawave with supplemental and/or amended responses to each of 20 the foregoing interrogatories and RFPs by the court-imposed deadline of May 10, 2016. If 21 Plaintiff answers “yes” with respect to any of the interrogatories and RFPs, it shall attach a copy 22 of the supplemental and/or amended response that it served along with a proof of service. R NIA Judge D H ER FO RT 28 onna M NO 27 D RDERE IS SO O IT ______________________________________ Donna M. Ryu United States Magistrate Judge . Ryu LI 26 Dated: July 21, 2016 A 25 IT IS SO ORDERED. S DISTRICT TE C TA RT U O 24 S 23 UNIT ED United States District Court Northern District of California 11 N F D IS T IC T O R C

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?