Rawlins v. UC Office of the President
Filing
16
SECOND ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE: Order to Show Cause Hearing set for 7/16/2015 10:00 AM. Show Cause Response due by 7/2/2015. Signed by Judge Maria-Elena James on 6/22/2015. (cdnS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/22/2015)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
7
TERRY RAWLINS,
Case No. 15-cv-00809-MEJ
Plaintiff,
8
v.
SECOND ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE
9
REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF
CALIFORNIA,
11
United States District Court
Northern District of California
10
Defendant.
12
13
On February 23, 2015, Plaintiff Terry Rawlins filed this employment discrimination case
14
against Defendant Regents of the University of California, at which time the matter was set for a
15
Case Management Conference on May 28, 2015. Dkt. Nos. 1-2. However, as of May 22, it was
16
not clear whether service of the summons and complaint has been completed in compliance with
17
Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4, and no joint or separate case management statement had been
18
filed by the May 21 deadline. Accordingly, the Court ordered Plaintiff to show cause why the
19
case should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute. Dkt. No. 5.
20
After the Court issued the Order to Show Cause, Defendant appeared and filed a request to
21
continue the Case Management Conference by one month, stating it was served on May 1, but the
22
parties had not had an opportunity to meet and confer. Dkt. No. 8. The Court granted
23
Defendant’s request and continued the Case Management Conference to June 25, 2015, with the
24
parties’ joint statement due June 18. Dkt. No. 10.
25
On June 18, 2015, Defendant filed a separate Case Management Statement, stating that it
26
attempted on multiple occasions to confer with Plaintiff, including two email communications and
27
three phone calls, and also prepared and sent Plaintiff a draft Joint Case Management Statement
28
for his consideration, but had not heard back from him. Dkt. No. 14. Plaintiff has not filed his
1
own case management statement and has made no appearance in this case since May 5, 2015.
2
Accordingly, the Court hereby ORDERS Plaintiff Terry Rawlins to show cause why this
3
case should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute and failure to comply with court deadlines.
4
Plaintiff shall file a declaration by July 2, 2015. If a responsive declaration is filed, the Court shall
5
either issue an order based on the declaration or conduct a hearing on July 16, 2015 at 10:00 a.m.
6
in Courtroom B, 15th Floor, 450 Golden Gate Avenue, San Francisco, California. Notice is
7
hereby provided to Plaintiff that the Court may dismiss this case without a hearing if no
8
responsive declaration is filed. Thus, it is imperative that the Court receive a written response by
9
the deadline above.
The June 25, 2015 Case Management Conference is VACATED.
11
United States District Court
Northern District of California
10
IT IS SO ORDERED.
12
13
14
15
Dated: June 22, 2015
______________________________________
MARIA-ELENA JAMES
United States Magistrate Judge
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
2
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
3
4
TERRY RAWLINS,
Case No. 15-cv-00809-MEJ
Plaintiff,
5
v.
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
6
7
UC OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT,
Defendant.
8
9
10
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
13
I, the undersigned, hereby certify that I am an employee in the Office of the Clerk, U.S.
District Court, Northern District of California.
That on June 22, 2015, I SERVED a true and correct copy(ies) of the attached, by placing
said copy(ies) in a postage paid envelope addressed to the person(s) hereinafter listed, by
depositing said envelope in the U.S. Mail, or by placing said copy(ies) into an inter-office delivery
receptacle located in the Clerk's office.
14
15
16
Terry Rawlins
1 Wood St.
Apt.5
San Francisco, CA 94118
17
18
19
Dated: June 22, 2015
20
21
Richard W. Wieking
Clerk, United States District Court
22
23
24
_______________________
Chris Nathan, Deputy Clerk to the
Honorable MARIA-ELENA JAMES
25
26
27
28
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?