Saechao v. Landry's, Inc., et al

Filing 160

REQUEST FOR RESPONSE RE LIENHOLDER'S MOTION. Signed by Judge Alsup on 10/31/16. (whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/31/2016)

1
2
3
4

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

5
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
7

MOUANG SAECHO, individually and on
behalf of all others similarly situated,

8
9

Plaintiff,
v.

12

LANDRY’S INC, a Delaware corporation,
and McCORMICK & SCHMICK
RESTAURANT CORP., a Delaware
corporation,

13

Defendants.

11
For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

10

No. C 15-00815 WHA

REQUEST FOR RESPONSE RE
LIENHOLDER’S MOTION

/

14
15

The parties informed Judge Ryu that they have resolved their fee dispute and continued

16

their settlement conference accordingly. By NOON ON NOVEMBER 1, they shall please state

17

whether the motion to have the fees deposited into a trust should be denied as moot or if the

18

hearing on that motion should be continued.

19
20

IT IS SO ORDERED.

21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

Dated: October 31, 2016.

WILLIAM ALSUP
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE