Saechao v. Landry's, Inc., et al

Filing 59

ORDER RE BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO EXTEND DEADLINE TO FILE CLASS CERTIFICATION MOTION by Hon. William Alsup finding as moot 58 Motion to Shorten Time. Defendant's response is due 11/24. No hearing shall be scheduled.(whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/23/2015)

1
2
3
4
5
6

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9

12

No. C 15-00815 WHA

Plaintiff,

11
For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

10

MOUANG SAECHO, individually and on
behalf of all others similarly situated,

v.

14

LANDRY’S INC, a Delaware corporation,
and McCORMICK & SCHMICK
RESTAURANT CORP., a Delaware
corporation,

15

Defendants.

13

ORDER RE BRIEFING
SCHEDULE FOR PLAINTIFF’S
MOTION TO EXTEND
DEADLINE TO FILE CLASS
CERTIFICATION MOTION
/

16
17

Plaintiff has filed an administrative motion to extend the deadline to file her class

18

certification motion from DECEMBER 31, 2015, TO FEBRUARY 12, 2016, pursuant to Civil L.R.

19

7-11, citing McCormick & Schmick’s alleged discovery delays. Plaintiff scheduled the briefing

20

and hearing on this motion on the normal 35-day calendar. This motion should be briefed

21

according to Civil L.R. 7-11 (McCormick & Schmick’s response is due on NOVEMBER 24, and

22

the Court will set a hearing if necessary). The hearing on DECEMBER 28 is hereby VACATED.

23

Plaintiff should consider filing a discovery letter if she has concerns about McCormick

24

& Schmick’s timely production of documents and scheduling depositions. The parties should

25

direct any requests relating to continuing the settlement conference to Judge Spero.

26

IT IS SO ORDERED.

27
28

Dated: November 23, 2015.

WILLIAM ALSUP
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE