Topete et al v. Ramos Furniture

Filing 60

**DISREGARD, E-FILED ON THE WRONG CASE.** ORDER OF DISMISSAL. Signed by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. on 2/10/2016. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/10/2016) Modified on 2/10/2016 (ndrS, COURT STAFF).

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 TUCKER DURNFORD, Case No. 15-cv-00413-HSG Plaintiff, 8 ORDER OF DISMISSAL v. 9 10 MUSCLEPHARM CORP., Defendant. United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 13 On December 18, 2015, the Court granted Defendant MusclePharm Corp.’s motion to 14 dismiss Plaintiff Tucker Durnford’s first amended class action complaint. Dkt. No. 52. The Court 15 granted Plaintiff leave to file an amended complaint within 21 days. Id. The deadline for Plaintiff 16 to file his second amended complaint passed, and on January 20, 2016, the Court issued an order 17 to show cause why the case should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute. Dkt. No. 53. In his 18 January 22, 2016, response to the Court’s order to show cause, Plaintiff indicated that he will not 19 amend his complaint and intends to appeal the Court’s dismissal of his first amended complaint. 20 Dkt. No. 53. 21 When a plaintiff has declined amendment of his complaint in favor of appealing the 22 dismissal, the court should dismiss the action with prejudice under Federal Rule of Civil 23 Procedure 12(b)(6). See Edwards v. Marin Park, Inc., 356 F.3d 1058 (9th Cir. 2004). 24 25 26 27 28 1 2 Accordingly, this action is DISMISSED with prejudice under Rule 12(b)(6). The Clerk shall enter judgment in favor of Defendant. Both parties shall bear their own costs of suit. 3 4 5 6 7 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: 2/10/2016 ______________________________________ HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR. United States District Judge 8 9 10 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?