Esurance Insurance Company v. Westchester Fire Insurance Company et al

Filing 43

Order by Hon. Samuel Conti granting 41 Stipulation selecting Private ADR. (sclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/13/2015)

Case3:15-cv-00862-SC Document41 Filed05/08/15 Page1 of 2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
ESURANCE INSURANCE
CO., a Wisconsin Corp.
,
Plaintiff(s),
v.
WESTCHESTER FIRE INS.
,
CO., a PA corp., et al.
Defendant(s).
_______________________________/

CASE NO. ______________________
3:15-cv-00862-SC

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS

Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached the
following stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5:
The parties agree to participate in the following ADR process:
Court Processes:
9
Non-binding Arbitration (ADR L.R. 4)
9
Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) (ADR L.R. 5)
9
Mediation (ADR L.R. 6)
(Note: Parties who believe that an early settlement conference with a Magistrate Judge is
appreciably more likely to meet their needs than any other form of ADR must participate in an
ADR phone conference and may not file this form. They must instead file a Notice of Need for
ADR Phone Conference. See Civil Local Rule 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5)
Private Process:
The parties agree to attend
9
Private ADR (please identify process and provider) ______________________
another mediation session with mediator Dave Rudy of Judicate West.
_____________________________________________________________________________
The parties agree to hold the ADR session by:
9
the presumptive deadline (The deadline is 90 days from the date of the order
referring the case to an ADR process unless otherwise ordered. )
9

November 20, 2015
other requested deadline _____________________________________________

Dated:___________
May 7, 2015

____________________________
/s/ Roseanne C. Lazzarotto, Esq.
Attorney for Plaintiff

Dated:____________
May 7, 2015

____________________________
/s/ Thomas J. Miller, Esq.
Attorney for Defendant Westchester

Dated:_May 8, 2015_
CONTINUE TO FOLLOWING PAGE
Dated: _May 8, 2015_

_/s/ Andrew L. Margulis, Esq._
Attorney for Defendant Steadfast
__/s/ Nicholas Cramb, Esq.____
Attorney for Defendant William
Gallagher, appearance by pro hac vice

Case3:15-cv-00862-SC Document41 Filed05/08/15 Page2 of 2

[PROPOSED] ORDER
9
9

Dated:

The parties’ stipulation is adopted and IT IS SO ORDERED.
The parties’ stipulation is modified as follows, and IT IS SO ORDERED.

May 13, 2015

__________________________________
The Hon. Samuel Conti
DISTRICT
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

When filing this document in ECF, please be sure to use the appropriate Docket
Event, e.g., “Stipulation and Proposed Order Selecting Mediation.”

Rev. 12/11
Page 2 of 2