Feaver et al v. Kaiser Foundation Health Plan, Inc. et al
Filing
42
STIPULATION AND ORDER re #40 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER REGARDING DEADLINE TO SUBMIT JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT filed by Kaiser Foundation Health Plan, Inc. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 2/16/16. (bpfS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/16/2016)
1
2
3
4
SEYFARTH SHAW LLP
Christian J. Rowley (SBN 187293)
Jason Allen (SBN 284432)
560 Mission Street, 31st Floor
San Francisco, California 94105
Telephone: (415) 397-2823
Facsimile: (415) 397-8549
crowley@seyfarth.com
5
6
7
8
9
10
Richard L. Alfred (SBN 015000) (pro hac vice)
Jessica S. Lieberman (SBN 669677) (pro hac vice)
Two Seaport Lane, Suite 300
Boston, Massachusetts 02210
Telephone: (617) 496-4802
Facsimile: (617) 946-4801
ralfred@seyfarth.com
Attorneys for Defendants
11
12
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
13
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
ROSE FEAVER, an individual,
MYUNGSHUN SHIM, an individual,
ARTIN ADAMIAN, an individual,
individually, and on behalf of all others
similarly situated,
)
)
)
)
)
)
Plaintiffs,
)
)
v.
)
)
)
KAISER FOUNDATION HEALTH PLAN,
)
INC., KAISER FOUNDATION HOSPITALS, )
and Does 1 through 50, Inclusive
)
)
Defendants.
)
)
)
CASE NO.: 3:15-CV-00890-EMC
Assigned To: Hon. Edward M. Chen
CLASS AND COLLECTIVE ACTION
STIPULATION REGARDING
DEADLINE TO SUBMIT JOINT CASE
MANAGEMENT STATEMENT
24
25
TO THE COURT, ALL PARTIES, AND THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD:
26
Defendants Kaiser Foundation Health Plan, Inc. and Kaiser Foundation Hospitals, Inc.
27
(collectively “Defendant”) and Plaintiffs Rose Feaver, Artin Adamian, and Myungsun Shim
28
(collectively “Plaintiffs”) (together, the “Parties”), by and through their respective counsel of
-1-
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT
1
2
record, hereby stipulate as follows:
1.
On January 5, 2016, the Court set a case management conference for February 18,
3
2016, and instructed the Parties to file an updated joint case management statement by February
4
11, 2016 (docket no. 38).
5
2.
In its Order dated January 27, 2016 granting Plaintiffs’ motion for conditional
6
certification (docket no. 39), this Court instructed the Parties to file by February 16, 2016 a
7
stipulation governing notice to the conditionally certified collective.
8
3.
The case deadlines that the Parties anticipate addressing in the updated joint case
9
management statement are dependent in part on the timeline for notice to the conditionally
10
certified collective, which the Parties will address in the joint stipulation regarding notice due
11
February 16, 2016.
12
4.
For this reason, the Parties request an extension of time to file the joint case
13
management statement through February 16, 2016, which would allow them to complete and file
14
the two documents together.
15
16
Dated: February 10, 2016
SEYFARTH SHAW, LLP
17
By: __Jessica S. Lieberman________
Jessica S. Lieberman (pro hac vice)
Attorneys for Defendant
18
19
20
Dated: February 10, 2016
KEARNEY LITTLEFIELD, LLP
STONEBARGER LAW, APC
21
22
By: __Prescott W. Littlefield________
Prescott W. Littlefield
Attorneys for Plaintiff
23
24
25
26
27
28
I, Jessica S. Lieberman, hereby attest that pursuant to LR 5-1(i) I have on file concurrence for
any signatures indicated by a “conformed” signature (/s/) within this e-filed document.
/s/ Jessica S. Lieberman
Jessica S. Lieberman
-2-
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT
1
[PROPOSED] ORDER
IT IS SO ORDERED.
6
S
2/16/16
Dated:__________________
_________________________________
Hon. Edward M. Chen
ERED
United States District Court Judge
O ORD
IS S
ITNorthern District of California
UNIT
ED
5
RT
U
O
4
S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
7
ER
LI
dwa
Judge E
11
A
H
10
RT
9
hen
rd M. C
NO
8
R NIA
3
FO
2
N
F
D IS T IC T O
R
C
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-3-
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?