Feaver et al v. Kaiser Foundation Health Plan, Inc. et al

Filing 42

STIPULATION AND ORDER re #40 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER REGARDING DEADLINE TO SUBMIT JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT filed by Kaiser Foundation Health Plan, Inc. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 2/16/16. (bpfS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/16/2016)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 SEYFARTH SHAW LLP Christian J. Rowley (SBN 187293) Jason Allen (SBN 284432) 560 Mission Street, 31st Floor San Francisco, California 94105 Telephone: (415) 397-2823 Facsimile: (415) 397-8549 crowley@seyfarth.com 5 6 7 8 9 10 Richard L. Alfred (SBN 015000) (pro hac vice) Jessica S. Lieberman (SBN 669677) (pro hac vice) Two Seaport Lane, Suite 300 Boston, Massachusetts 02210 Telephone: (617) 496-4802 Facsimile: (617) 946-4801 ralfred@seyfarth.com Attorneys for Defendants 11 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 13 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 ROSE FEAVER, an individual, MYUNGSHUN SHIM, an individual, ARTIN ADAMIAN, an individual, individually, and on behalf of all others similarly situated, ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) ) ) KAISER FOUNDATION HEALTH PLAN, ) INC., KAISER FOUNDATION HOSPITALS, ) and Does 1 through 50, Inclusive ) ) Defendants. ) ) ) CASE NO.: 3:15-CV-00890-EMC Assigned To: Hon. Edward M. Chen CLASS AND COLLECTIVE ACTION STIPULATION REGARDING DEADLINE TO SUBMIT JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT 24 25 TO THE COURT, ALL PARTIES, AND THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD: 26 Defendants Kaiser Foundation Health Plan, Inc. and Kaiser Foundation Hospitals, Inc. 27 (collectively “Defendant”) and Plaintiffs Rose Feaver, Artin Adamian, and Myungsun Shim 28 (collectively “Plaintiffs”) (together, the “Parties”), by and through their respective counsel of -1- STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT 1 2 record, hereby stipulate as follows: 1. On January 5, 2016, the Court set a case management conference for February 18, 3 2016, and instructed the Parties to file an updated joint case management statement by February 4 11, 2016 (docket no. 38). 5 2. In its Order dated January 27, 2016 granting Plaintiffs’ motion for conditional 6 certification (docket no. 39), this Court instructed the Parties to file by February 16, 2016 a 7 stipulation governing notice to the conditionally certified collective. 8 3. The case deadlines that the Parties anticipate addressing in the updated joint case 9 management statement are dependent in part on the timeline for notice to the conditionally 10 certified collective, which the Parties will address in the joint stipulation regarding notice due 11 February 16, 2016. 12 4. For this reason, the Parties request an extension of time to file the joint case 13 management statement through February 16, 2016, which would allow them to complete and file 14 the two documents together. 15 16 Dated: February 10, 2016 SEYFARTH SHAW, LLP 17 By: __Jessica S. Lieberman________ Jessica S. Lieberman (pro hac vice) Attorneys for Defendant 18 19 20 Dated: February 10, 2016 KEARNEY LITTLEFIELD, LLP STONEBARGER LAW, APC 21 22 By: __Prescott W. Littlefield________ Prescott W. Littlefield Attorneys for Plaintiff 23 24 25 26 27 28 I, Jessica S. Lieberman, hereby attest that pursuant to LR 5-1(i) I have on file concurrence for any signatures indicated by a “conformed” signature (/s/) within this e-filed document. /s/ Jessica S. Lieberman Jessica S. Lieberman -2- STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT 1 [PROPOSED] ORDER IT IS SO ORDERED. 6 S 2/16/16 Dated:__________________ _________________________________ Hon. Edward M. Chen ERED United States District Court Judge O ORD IS S ITNorthern District of California UNIT ED 5 RT U O 4 S DISTRICT TE C TA 7 ER LI dwa Judge E 11 A H 10 RT 9 hen rd M. C NO 8 R NIA 3 FO 2 N F D IS T IC T O R C 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -3- STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?