Estate of Glenn Swindell et al v. County of Sonoma

Filing 44

ORDER, Motions terminated: 43 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER to Continue Case Management Conference and Mediation Compliance Deadline filed by County of Sonoma. Further Case Management Conference set for 5/6/2016 03:00 PM in Courtroom 1, 17th Floor, San Francisco.. Signed by Judge Susan Illston on 4/1/16. (tfS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/1/2016)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Arnoldo Casillas, State Bar No. 158519 Denisse O. Gastélum, State Bar No 282771 CASILLAS & ASSOCIATES 3500 W. Beverly Blvd. Montebello, CA 90640 Telephone: (323) 725-0917 Facsimile: (323) 725-0350 Email: acasillas@casillaslegal.com dgastelum@casillaslegal.com Attorneys for Plaintiffs ESTATE OF GLENN SWINDELL, G.S., M.S., J.S., DEBORAH BELKA and TYLER SWINDELL Jonathan D. Melrod, State Bar No. 136441 1313 Scheibel Lane Sebastopol, CA 95472 Telephone: (415) 806-0154 Email: jonathan4536@sbcglobal.net Attorneys for Plaintiff SARAH SWINDELL Bruce D. Goldstein, State Bar No. 135970 County Counsel Joshua A. Myers, State Bar No. 250988 Deputy County Counsel OFFICE OF THE SONOMA COUNTY COUNSEL 575 Administration Drive, Room 105A Santa Rosa, CA 95403-2815 Telephone: (707) 565-2421 Facsimile: (707) 565-2624 Email: joshua.myers@sonoma-county.org Attorneys for Defendant COUNTY OF SONOMA 14 15 Thomas F. Bertrand, State Bar No. 056560 Richard W. Osman, State Bar No. 167993 Edward F. Sears, State Bar No. 297775 BERTRAND, FOX, ELLIOT, OSMAN & WENZEL 2749 Hyde Street San Francisco, CA 94109 Telephone: (415) 353-0999 Facsimile: (415) 353-0990 Email: rosman@bfesf.com UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 16 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 17 18 ESTATE OF GLENN SWINDELL, et al., Case No. 15-cv-00897 SI 19 Plaintiffs, 20 21 22 v. STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND MEDIATION COMPLIANCE DEADLINE COUNTY OF SONOMA, DOES 1 through 10, inclusive, 23 Defendants. 24 25 26 27 28 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED BY AND BETWEEN the parties to the above captioned matter that the deadline for the parties to participate in private mediation be continued from April 8, 2016 to April 20, 2016 and the Case Management Conference currently set for April 22, 2016, be continued to 1 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND MEDIATION COMPLIANCE DEADLINE Estate of Glenn Swindell, et al., v. County of Sonoma, et al.; USDC Northern District of CA Case No.: 15-cv-00897 SI 1 May 6, 2016, or a date thereafter that is convenient for the court. 2 The requested continuances are necessary because the parties’ mediator of choice, the Honorable 3 Raul Ramirez, is not available on a mutually agreeable date until April 20, 2016. The parties are 4 currently scheduled to participate in a mediation on April 20, 2016. Thus, the parties request the 5 deadline to participate in private mediation be continued from April 8, 2016 to April 20, 2016. 6 Furthermore, the April 20, 2016 mediation is scheduled just two days prior to the April 22, 2016 7 Case Management Conference. In the interest of conserving judicial and attorney resources, the parties 8 request that the Case Management Conference be continued to May 6, 2016, or such other date thereafter 9 as is convenient for the court, so that the parties may meaningfully apprise the court of the results of 10 mediation. 11 For the reasons set forth above, the parties stipulate to continue the deadline for the parties to 12 participate in private mediation to April 20, 2016 and continue the Case Management Conference to May 13 6, 2016 or a date thereafter as is convenient to the court. 14 IT IS SO STIPULATED, THROUGH COUNSEL OF RECORD. 15 16 Dated: March 31, 2016 CASILLAS & ASSOCIATES By 17 18 19 20 /s/ Arnoldo Casillas ARNOLDO CASILLAS DENISSE O. GASTÉLUM Attorneys for Plaintiffs ESTATE OF GLENN SWINDELL, G.S., M.S., J.S., TYLER SWINDELL, and DEBORAH BELKA 21 22 23 24 25 Dated: March 31, 2016 JONATHAN D. MELROD, ESQ. By: /s/ Jonathan D. Melrod JONATHAN D. MELROD Attorney for Plaintiff SARAH SWINDELL 26 27 28 2 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND MEDIATION COMPLIANCE DEADLINE Estate of Glenn Swindell, et al., v. County of Sonoma, et al.; USDC Northern District of CA Case No.: 15-cv-00897 SI 1 Dated: March 31, 2016 BERTRAND, FOX, ELLIOT, OSMAN & WENZEL 2 By: 3 4 5 6 /s/ Richard W. Osman Thomas F. Bertrand Richard W. Osman Edward F. Sears Attorneys for Defendant COUNTY OF SONOMA 7 8 9 ELECTRONIC CASE FILING ATTESTATION 10 I, Richard W. Osman, am the ECF user whose identification and password are being used to file 11 the foregoing documents. Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 5.1(i), I hereby attest that concurrence in the filing 12 of these documents has been obtained from each of its Signatories. 13 Dated: March 31, 2016 14 15 BERTRAND, FOX, ELLIOT, OSMAN & WENZEL By: /s/ Richard W. Osman Richard W. Osman 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND MEDIATION COMPLIANCE DEADLINE Estate of Glenn Swindell, et al., v. County of Sonoma, et al.; USDC Northern District of CA Case No.: 15-cv-00897 SI 1 2 [PROPOSED] ORDER 3 WHEREFORE, pursuant to stipulation of the parties, it is hereby ordered that the Case 4 Management Conference, currently set for April 22, 2016 be continued to _____________________ and May 6, 2016 April the current mediation compliance deadline of June 8, 2016 be continued to _______________________. April 20, 2016 5 6 IT IS SO ORDERED. 7 8 9 4/1/16 DATED: ____________________ ___________________________________ HONORABLE SUSAN ILLSTON 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 4 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND MEDIATION COMPLIANCE DEADLINE Estate of Glenn Swindell, et al., v. County of Sonoma, et al.; USDC Northern District of CA Case No.: 15-cv-00897 SI

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?