Estate of Glenn Swindell et al v. County of Sonoma
Filing
47
ORDER, Motions terminated: 46 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER to Continue Case Management Conference filed by County of Sonoma. Further Case Management Conference set for 6/24/2016 03:00 PM in Courtroom 1, 17th Floor, San Francisco.. Signed by Judge Susan Illston on 5/2/16. (tfS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/2/2016)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
Arnoldo Casillas, State Bar No. 158519
Denisse O. Gastélum, State Bar No 282771
CASILLAS & ASSOCIATES
3500 W. Beverly Blvd.
Montebello, CA 90640
Telephone: (323) 725-0917
Facsimile: (323) 725-0350
Email: acasillas@casillaslegal.com
dgastelum@casillaslegal.com
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
ESTATE OF GLENN SWINDELL,
G.S., M.S., J.S., DEBORAH BELKA
and TYLER SWINDELL
Jonathan D. Melrod, State Bar No. 136441
1313 Scheibel Lane
Sebastopol, CA 95472
Telephone: (415) 806-0154
Email: jonathan4536@sbcglobal.net
Attorneys for Plaintiff
SARAH SWINDELL
Bruce D. Goldstein, State Bar No. 135970
County Counsel
Joshua A. Myers, State Bar No. 250988
Deputy County Counsel
OFFICE OF THE SONOMA
COUNTY COUNSEL
575 Administration Drive, Room 105A
Santa Rosa, CA 95403-2815
Telephone: (707) 565-2421
Facsimile: (707) 565-2624
Email: joshua.myers@sonoma-county.org
Attorneys for Defendant
COUNTY OF SONOMA
14
15
Thomas F. Bertrand, State Bar No. 056560
Richard W. Osman, State Bar No. 167993
Edward F. Sears, State Bar No. 297775
BERTRAND, FOX, ELLIOT,
OSMAN & WENZEL
2749 Hyde Street
San Francisco, CA 94109
Telephone: (415) 353-0999
Facsimile: (415) 353-0990
Email: rosman@bfesf.com
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
16
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
17
18
ESTATE OF GLENN SWINDELL, et al.,
Case No. 15-cv-00897 SI
19
Plaintiffs,
20
21
22
v.
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO
CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT
CONFERENCE
COUNTY OF SONOMA, DOES 1 through 10,
inclusive,
23
Defendants.
24
25
26
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED BY AND BETWEEN the parties to the above captioned matter
27
that the Case Management Conference currently set for May 6, 2016, be continued to June 24, 2016, or a
28
date thereafter that is convenient for the court.
1
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
Estate of Glenn Swindell, et al., v. County of Sonoma, et al.; USDC Northern District of CA Case No.: 15-cv-00897 SI
1
In the time since the current case management conference was set for May 6, 2016, a series of
2
motions were scheduled for that same date in Delaware District Bankruptcy Court in Wilmington,
3
Delaware (In re: Skybridge Spectrum Foundation, United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of
4
Delaware, Ch. 11 Case No. 16-10626 (CSS)). Richard Osman, lead attorney for the COUNTY OF
5
SONOMA, is now being required to attend the bankruptcy court hearings, scheduled to commence at 1
6
p.m. on May 6, 2016.
7
Due to this new scheduling conflict, Mr. Osman consulted this Court for possible alternate dates
8
for the case management conference. He and opposing counsel then selected June 24, 2016 from those
9
dates as being the most convenient for all parties involved.
10
11
12
For the reasons set forth above, the parties stipulate to continue the Case Management Conference
to June 24, 2016 or a date thereafter as is convenient to the court.
IT IS SO STIPULATED, THROUGH COUNSEL OF RECORD.
13
14
Dated: April 29, 2016
CASILLAS & ASSOCIATES
By
15
16
17
18
19
Dated: April 29, 2016
/s/ Arnoldo Casillas
ARNOLDO CASILLAS
DENISSE O. GASTÉLUM
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
ESTATE OF GLENN SWINDELL, G.S.,
M.S., J.S., TYLER SWINDELL,
and DEBORAH BELKA
JONATHAN D. MELROD, ESQ.
20
By:
21
22
23
Dated: April 29, 2016
BERTRAND, FOX, ELLIOT,
OSMAN & WENZEL
24
25
26
27
/s/ Jonathan D. Melrod
JONATHAN D. MELROD
Attorney for Plaintiff
SARAH SWINDELL
By:
/s/ Richard W. Osman
Richard W. Osman
Edward F. Sears
Attorneys for Defendant
COUNTY OF SONOMA
28
2
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
Estate of Glenn Swindell, et al., v. County of Sonoma, et al.; USDC Northern District of CA Case No.: 15-cv-00897 SI
ELECTRONIC CASE FILING ATTESTATION
1
2
I, Richard W. Osman, am the ECF user whose identification and password are being used to file
3
the foregoing documents. Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 5.1(i), I hereby attest that concurrence in the filing
4
of these documents has been obtained from each of its Signatories.
5
Dated: April 29, 2016
6
7
BERTRAND, FOX, ELLIOT,
OSMAN & WENZEL
By: /s/ Richard W. Osman
Richard W. Osman
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
Estate of Glenn Swindell, et al., v. County of Sonoma, et al.; USDC Northern District of CA Case No.: 15-cv-00897 SI
1
2
3
4
5
[PROPOSED] ORDER
WHEREFORE, pursuant to stipulation of the parties, it is hereby ordered that the Case
June 24, 2016 @ .
Management Conference, currently set for May 6, 2016 be continued to _____________________3 p.m.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
6
7
8
5/2/16
DATED: ____________________
___________________________________
HONORABLE SUSAN ILLSTON
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
4
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
Estate of Glenn Swindell, et al., v. County of Sonoma, et al.; USDC Northern District of CA Case No.: 15-cv-00897 SI
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?