Uber Technologies, Inc. v. Doe I

Filing 71

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.S NOTICE OFDISCOVERY RELATED TO UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. V. JOHN DOE I, CASE NO. 3:15-CV-00908-LB, AND MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER. Signed by Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler on 10/8/2015. (rmm2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/9/2015)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP MICHAEL LI-MING WONG (SBN 194130) mwong@gibsondunn.com THAD A. DAVIS (SBN 220503) tdavis@gibsondunn.com 555 Mission Street, Suite 3000 San Francisco, CA 94105-0921 Telephone: 415.393.8200 Facsimile: 415.393.8306 10 GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP JOSHUA A. JESSEN (SBN 222831) jjessen@gibsondunn.com PRIYANKA RAJAGOPALAN (SBN 278504) prajagopalan@gibsondunn.com 1881 Page Mill Road Palo Alto, CA 94304 Telephone: 650.849.5300 Facsimile: 650.849.5333 11 Attorneys for Defendant Uber Technologies, Inc. 7 8 9 12 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 14 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 SASHA ANTMAN, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, v. UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. and Does 150, No. 3:15–CV–01175–LB [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.’S NOTICE OF DISCOVERY RELATED TO UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. V. JOHN DOE I, CASE NO. 3:15-CV-00908-LB, AND MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER Defendant. 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING UBER TECHS., INC.’S NOTICE OF DISCOVERY RELATED TO UBER TECHS., INC. V. JOHN DOE I, CASE NO. 3:15-CV-00908-LB, AND MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER – CASE NO. 3:15-CV-01175 1 Having considered Uber Technologies, Inc.’s Notice of Discovery Related to Uber 2 Technologies, Inc. v. John Doe I, Case No. 3:15-cv-00908-LB (the “John Doe matter”) and Motion 3 for Protective Order (“Notice and Motion”), and good cause appearing, the Court hereby ORDERS 4 that: 5 6 (1) The Stipulated Protective Order submitted with the Notice and Motion shall govern the exchange and use of documents and information in this case. 7 (2) Uber Technologies, Inc. may use the information gleaned from discovery in the John Doe 8 matter in preparing further discovery in the present action, subject to the Stipulated Protective Order 9 and the ordinary limitations of the Federal Rules of Evidence. This Order is without prejudice to any 10 Party’s right to object to, or seek protection from, a discovery request on appropriate grounds. 11 IT IS SO ORDERED. 12 October 8 Dated: ________________, 2015 13 14 __________________________________ HON. LAUREL BEELER UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING UBER TECHS., INC.’S NOTICE OF DISCOVERY RELATED TO UBER TECHS., INC. V. JOHN DOE I, CASE NO. 3:15-CV-00908-LB, AND MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER – CASE NO. 3:15-CV-01175

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?