Buchla v. Buchla Electronic Musical Instrument, LLC et al

Filing 34

ORDER 33 Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Extending Briefing Schedule for Defendants' Motion to Compel Arbitration, 26 First MOTION to Compel Arbitration. Responses due by 5/21/2015; Replies due by 6/4/2015. Signed by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. on 5/14/2015. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/14/2015)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9

DAVID R. EBERHART (S.B. #195474)
[e-mail]
TIM BYRON (S.B. #277569)
[e-mail]
DIANA ROGOSA (S.B. #287967)
[e-mail]
JESSE J. KOEHLER (S.B. #300530)
[e-mail]
O’MELVENY & MYERS LLP
Two Embarcadero Center, 28th Floor
San Francisco, California 94111-3823
Telephone:
[phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]
Attorneys for Plaintiff
DONALD BUCHLA, D/B/A
BUCHLA & ASSOCIATES

10

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

11

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

12

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

13
14
15

DONALD BUCHLA, D/B/A BUCHLA &
ASSOCIATES,
Plaintiff,

16
17
18
19
20

v.
BUCHLA ELECTRONIC MUSICAL
INSTRUMENT, LLC, ET AL.,
Defendants.

Case No. 3:15-VC-00921-HSG
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER EXTENDING BRIEFING
SCHEDULE FOR DEFENDANTS’
MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION
Pursuant to L.R. 6-1(b), 6-2(a), and 7-12
Judge:

Hon. Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr.
Courtroom 15, 18th Floor

21
22

Pursuant to Civil Local Rules 6-1(b), 6-2(a), and 7-12,

Plaintiff and Defendants

23

respectfully request that the Court extend the briefing schedule for Defendants’ Motion to

24

Compel Arbitration, which is noticed for hearing on July 9, 2015. ECF No. 27. The parties seek

25

to extend Plaintiff’s deadline to respond to Defendants’ Motion from May 14, 2015 to May 21,

26

2015, and Defendants’ deadline to reply to Plaintiff’s Opposition from May 21, 2015 to June 4,

27

2015. The proposed extension will provide both Plaintiff and Defendants with one additional

28

week to prepare their briefs, consult with their respective clients, and, if necessary, review and
STIP. & [PROPOSED] ORDER
TO EXTEND BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR
DEFS.’ MOT. TO COMPEL ARBITRATION

1

analyze evidence that may be relevant to Defendants’ Motion. There have been no prior time

2

modifications in connection with Defendants’ Motion, and the requested enlargement will have

3

no apparent effect on the schedule for the case.

4
5

IT IS SO STIPULATED.
Respectfully submitted,

6
7

Dated: May 14, 2015
By:

8
9

/s/ David R. Eberhart
David R. Eberhart

13

David R. Eberhart
Tim Byron
Diana Rogosa
O’MELVENY & MYERS LLP
Two Embarcadero Center, 28th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94111
Telephone:
[phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]

14

Attorneys for Plaintiff

10
11
12

15
Dated: May 14, 2015
16

By:

17
18
19
20
21

/s/ Gregory S. Cavallo
Gregory S. Cavallo

Gregory S. Cavallo
SHOPOFF CAVALLO & KIRSCH LLP
601 Montgomery Street, Suite 1110
San Francisco, CA 94111
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile:
415-984-1978
Attorneys for Defendants

22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2-

STIP. & [PROPOSED] ORDER
TO EXTEND BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR
DEFS.’ MOT. TO COMPEL ARBITRATION

1

ATTESTATION

2

I hereby attest that the other signatory listed concurs in this filing’s content and has

3
4

authorized the filing.
Dated: May 14, 2015

O’MELVENY & MYERS LLP

5
6

By:

7

/s/ David R. Eberhart
David R. Eberhart

8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-3-

STIP. & [PROPOSED] ORDER
TO EXTEND BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR
DEFS.’ MOT. TO COMPEL ARBITRATION

1
2

[PROPOSED] ORDER
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

3
4
5

Dated: _________________________
5/14/2015

_____________________________
Honorable Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr.
United States District Judge

6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-4-

STIP. & [PROPOSED] ORDER
TO EXTEND BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR
DEFS.’ MOT. TO COMPEL ARBITRATION