Restoration Hardware, Inc. et al v. Light In The Box Limited

Filing 28

ORDER CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT re 27 STIPULATION. Case Management Statement due by 9/1/2015. Case Management Conference continued to 9/8/2015 02:00 PM in Courtroom 2, 17th Floor, San Francisco. Signed by Judge William H. Orrick on 7/24/2015. (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/24/2015)

Download PDF
4 Harrison J. Frahn IV (Bar No. 206822) hfrahn@stblaw.com SIMPSON THACHER & BARTLETT LLP 2475 Hanover Street Palo Alto, California 94304 Telephone: (650) 251-5000 Facsimile: (650) 251-5002 5 Attorneys for Defendant LightInTheBox Holding Co., Ltd. 1 2 3 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 10 11 12 RESTORATION HARDWARE, INC., a Delaware corporation, and RH US, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, Plaintiffs, 13 vs. 14 15 16 LIGHT IN THE BOX LIMITED, a Hong Kong limited liability company, and LIGHTINTHEBOX HOLDING CO., LTD., a Cayman Islands exempted company, 17 Civil Case No.: 3:15-cv-00924-WHO The Honorable William H. Orrick STIPULATION AND ORDER CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT First Amended Complaint Filed: May 14, 2015 Current CMC Date: August 4, 2015 Defendants. 18 19 20 Plaintiffs Restoration Hardware, Inc. and RH US, LLC, (collectively, “Plaintiffs”), 21 and Defendant LightInTheBox Holding Company, Limited, (“LITB Holding Co.”) (collectively, 22 the “Parties”), hereby stipulate to a (1) 30-day continuance of the Case Management Conference 23 (“CMC”) (and all dates associated therewith), current set for August 4, 2015, and (2) a 30-day 24 extension of Defendant LITB Holding Co.’s time to respond to the First Amended Complaint from 25 July 27, 2015, to and including August 26, 2015. The Parties’ stipulation is based on the 26 following facts: 27 1. 28 Plaintiffs filed a First Amended Complaint (“FAC”) in the above captioned case against Defendant LITB Holding Co. on May 14, 2015, (Dkt. No. 13); STIPULATION AND ORDER CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT, CASE NO.: 3:15-CV-00924-WHO 1 2. Plaintiffs and Defendant LITB Holding Co. conferred and subsequently entered a 2 joint stipulation extending Defendant LITB Holding Co.’s time to respond to the FAC from 3 June 5, 2015 to June 26, 2015 (Dkt. No. 15); 4 3. After ongoing settlement discussions, Plaintiffs and Defendant LITB Holding Co. 5 entered into a second joint stipulation continuing the case management conference scheduled for 6 June 30, 2015, and extending Defendant LITB Holding Co.’s time to respond to the FAC from 7 June 26, 2015 to July 27, 2015, (Dkt. No. 23); 8 9 10 4. The Parties have resolved the dispute between them and are in the process of finalizing a settlement agreement; 5. In light of the impending settlement, the Parties would like to continue the case 11 management conference currently scheduled for August 4, 2015, and request a 30-day extension 12 of time for Defendant LITB Holding Co. to respond to the FAC; 13 14 15 4. The Parties submit that this agreement was made in the spirit of conserving judicial resources and is in the best interests of the Parties. 5. The Parties, therefore, respectfully request that: (1) the CMC scheduled for August 16 4, 2015 be continued for 30 days, until early September, 2015 on a date convenient to the Court; 17 (2) the date for filing the Joint CMC Statement be continued until one week before the new CMC 18 date; and (3) Defendant LITB Holding Co.’s time to respond to the Complaint be extended from 19 July 27, 2015, to and including August 26, 2015. 20 Dated: July 24, 2015 21 SIMPSON THACHER & BARTLETT LLP By: /s/ Harrison J. Frahn IV Harrison J. Frahn IV 22 Harrison J. Frahn IV hfrahn@stblaw.com 2475 Hanover Street Palo Alto, California 94304 Tel: (650) 251-5000 Fax: (650) 251-5002 23 24 25 26 Attorney for Defendant LightintheBox Holding Co., Ltd. 27 28 -2STIPULATION AND ORDER CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT, CASE NO: 3:15-CV-00924-WHO 1 LEWIS ROCA ROTHGERBER LLP 2 By: /s/ Michael J. McCue Michael J. McCue 3 Michael J. McCue McCue@LRRLaw.com Aaron D. Johnson ADJohnson@LRRLaw.com 3993 Howard Hughes Parkway, Suite 600 Las Vegas, Nevada 89169-5996 Tel: (650) 391-1380 Fax: (702) 391-1395 4 5 6 7 8 Attorneys for Plaintiffs Restoration Hardware, Inc. and RH US, LLC 9 10 Attestation: Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), the filer attests that 11 12 concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from the signatories to this 13 document. 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -3STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT, CASE NO: 3:15-CV-00924-WHO ORDER 1 Pursuant to the Parties’ stipulation and for good cause shown, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED 2 3 4 5 6 that: 1. The Case Management Conference shall be continued from August 4, 2015, until September 8 2015; __________, 2. All other deadlines associated with the Case Management Conference, including 7 the filing of a Joint Case Management Conference statement, shall be continued until one week 8 before the new CMC date. The Parties shall comply with this Court’s Standing Order re: Initial 9 Case Management and the Standing Order for All Judges of the Northern District of California re: Defendant LITB Holding Co.’s time to respond to the First Amended Complaint is extended by thirty days, from July 27, 2015, to and including August 26, 2015. S UNIT ED TED GRAN ________________________ Honorable William H. Orrick United States District Judge RT H 15 Judge W ER illiam H . Orr ick R NIA Dated: ______________, 2015 July 24 NO 14 S DISTRICT TE C TA RT U O 13 FO 12 3. LI 11 Contents of Case Management Statements. A 10 N F D IS T IC T O R C 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -4STIPULATION AND ORDER CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT, CASE NO: 3:15-CV-00924-WHO

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?