Restoration Hardware, Inc. et al v. Light In The Box Limited
Filing
28
ORDER CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT re 27 STIPULATION. Case Management Statement due by 9/1/2015. Case Management Conference continued to 9/8/2015 02:00 PM in Courtroom 2, 17th Floor, San Francisco. Signed by Judge William H. Orrick on 7/24/2015. (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/24/2015)
4
Harrison J. Frahn IV (Bar No. 206822)
hfrahn@stblaw.com
SIMPSON THACHER & BARTLETT LLP
2475 Hanover Street
Palo Alto, California 94304
Telephone: (650) 251-5000
Facsimile: (650) 251-5002
5
Attorneys for Defendant LightInTheBox Holding Co., Ltd.
1
2
3
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
10
11
12
RESTORATION HARDWARE, INC., a
Delaware corporation, and RH US, LLC, a
Delaware limited liability company,
Plaintiffs,
13
vs.
14
15
16
LIGHT IN THE BOX LIMITED, a Hong
Kong limited liability company, and
LIGHTINTHEBOX HOLDING CO., LTD.,
a Cayman Islands exempted company,
17
Civil Case No.: 3:15-cv-00924-WHO
The Honorable William H. Orrick
STIPULATION AND
ORDER CONTINUING CASE
MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND
EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO
COMPLAINT
First Amended Complaint Filed: May 14, 2015
Current CMC Date: August 4, 2015
Defendants.
18
19
20
Plaintiffs Restoration Hardware, Inc. and RH US, LLC, (collectively, “Plaintiffs”),
21
and Defendant LightInTheBox Holding Company, Limited, (“LITB Holding Co.”) (collectively,
22
the “Parties”), hereby stipulate to a (1) 30-day continuance of the Case Management Conference
23
(“CMC”) (and all dates associated therewith), current set for August 4, 2015, and (2) a 30-day
24
extension of Defendant LITB Holding Co.’s time to respond to the First Amended Complaint from
25
July 27, 2015, to and including August 26, 2015. The Parties’ stipulation is based on the
26
following facts:
27
1.
28
Plaintiffs filed a First Amended Complaint (“FAC”) in the above captioned case
against Defendant LITB Holding Co. on May 14, 2015, (Dkt. No. 13);
STIPULATION AND ORDER CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO FIRST
AMENDED COMPLAINT, CASE NO.: 3:15-CV-00924-WHO
1
2.
Plaintiffs and Defendant LITB Holding Co. conferred and subsequently entered a
2
joint stipulation extending Defendant LITB Holding Co.’s time to respond to the FAC from
3
June 5, 2015 to June 26, 2015 (Dkt. No. 15);
4
3.
After ongoing settlement discussions, Plaintiffs and Defendant LITB Holding Co.
5
entered into a second joint stipulation continuing the case management conference scheduled for
6
June 30, 2015, and extending Defendant LITB Holding Co.’s time to respond to the FAC from
7
June 26, 2015 to July 27, 2015, (Dkt. No. 23);
8
9
10
4.
The Parties have resolved the dispute between them and are in the process of
finalizing a settlement agreement;
5.
In light of the impending settlement, the Parties would like to continue the case
11
management conference currently scheduled for August 4, 2015, and request a 30-day extension
12
of time for Defendant LITB Holding Co. to respond to the FAC;
13
14
15
4.
The Parties submit that this agreement was made in the spirit of conserving judicial
resources and is in the best interests of the Parties.
5.
The Parties, therefore, respectfully request that: (1) the CMC scheduled for August
16
4, 2015 be continued for 30 days, until early September, 2015 on a date convenient to the Court;
17
(2) the date for filing the Joint CMC Statement be continued until one week before the new CMC
18
date; and (3) Defendant LITB Holding Co.’s time to respond to the Complaint be extended from
19
July 27, 2015, to and including August 26, 2015.
20
Dated: July 24, 2015
21
SIMPSON THACHER & BARTLETT LLP
By: /s/ Harrison J. Frahn IV
Harrison J. Frahn IV
22
Harrison J. Frahn IV
hfrahn@stblaw.com
2475 Hanover Street
Palo Alto, California 94304
Tel: (650) 251-5000
Fax: (650) 251-5002
23
24
25
26
Attorney for Defendant LightintheBox Holding Co.,
Ltd.
27
28
-2STIPULATION AND ORDER CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO FIRST
AMENDED COMPLAINT, CASE NO: 3:15-CV-00924-WHO
1
LEWIS ROCA ROTHGERBER LLP
2
By: /s/ Michael J. McCue
Michael J. McCue
3
Michael J. McCue
McCue@LRRLaw.com
Aaron D. Johnson
ADJohnson@LRRLaw.com
3993 Howard Hughes Parkway, Suite 600
Las Vegas, Nevada 89169-5996
Tel: (650) 391-1380
Fax: (702) 391-1395
4
5
6
7
8
Attorneys for Plaintiffs Restoration Hardware, Inc.
and RH US, LLC
9
10
Attestation: Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), the filer attests that
11
12
concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from the signatories to this
13
document.
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-3STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO FIRST
AMENDED COMPLAINT, CASE NO: 3:15-CV-00924-WHO
ORDER
1
Pursuant to the Parties’ stipulation and for good cause shown, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED
2
3
4
5
6
that:
1.
The Case Management Conference shall be continued from August 4, 2015, until
September 8 2015;
__________,
2.
All other deadlines associated with the Case Management Conference, including
7
the filing of a Joint Case Management Conference statement, shall be continued until one week
8
before the new CMC date. The Parties shall comply with this Court’s Standing Order re: Initial
9
Case Management and the Standing Order for All Judges of the Northern District of California re:
Defendant LITB Holding Co.’s time to respond to the First Amended Complaint is
extended by thirty days, from July 27, 2015, to and including August 26, 2015.
S
UNIT
ED
TED
GRAN
________________________
Honorable William H. Orrick
United States District Judge
RT
H
15
Judge W
ER
illiam H
. Orr ick
R NIA
Dated: ______________, 2015
July 24
NO
14
S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
RT
U
O
13
FO
12
3.
LI
11
Contents of Case Management Statements.
A
10
N
F
D IS T IC T O
R
C
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-4STIPULATION AND ORDER CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO FIRST
AMENDED COMPLAINT, CASE NO: 3:15-CV-00924-WHO
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?