Enriquez et al v. Bank of America NA et al

Filing 38

ORDER VACATING HEARING ON DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on July 14, 2015. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/14/2015)

1
2
3
4
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

5

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

6
7
8

ROMUALDO ENRIQUEZ and OLIVIA
ENRIQUEZ,

No. C-15-0940 MMC
ORDER VACATING HEARING ON
DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS

9
Plaintiffs,
For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

10
11

v.
BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., et al.,
Defendants.

12

/

13
14

Before the Court is the Motion to Dismiss, filed June 8, 2015, on behalf of

15

defendants Bank of America, N.A., and The Bank of New York Mellon f/k/a The Bank of

16

New York as trustee for the Structured Asset Mortgage Investments II Trust 2006-AR7

17

Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2006-AR7. Plaintiffs Romualdo and Olivia

18

Enriquez have filed opposition, to which defendants have replied.1 Having read and

19

considered the papers filed in support of and in opposition to the motion, the Court deems

20

the matter appropriate for determination on the parties’ respective written submissions, and

21

hereby VACATES the hearing scheduled for July 17, 2015.

22

IT IS SO ORDERED.

23
24

Dated: July 14, 2015
MAXINE M. CHESNEY
United States District Judge

25
26
1

27
28

Defendants failed to provide the Court with a chambers copy of their reply.
Nonetheless, the Court has considered it. For future reference, defendants are reminded
that, pursuant to Civil Local Rule 5-1(e)(7) and the Court’s Standing Orders, parties are
required to provide for use in chambers one paper copy of each document that is filed
electronically.