Enriquez et al v. Bank of America NA et al

Filing 56

ORDER OF DISMISSAL. The parties having advised the Court that they have agreed to a settlement of this cause, and the settlement having been placed on the record, it is ordered that plaintiffs' claims are dismissed without prejudice; prov ided, however, that if any party shall certify to this Court, within ninety (90) days, that the agreed consideration for the settlement has not been delivered, the foregoing order shall stand vacated and the action shall forthwith be restored to the calendar for further proceedings as appropriate. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on December 15, 2015. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/15/2015)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

8

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9
For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

10
11

No. C 15-0940 MMC

ROMUALDO ENRIQUEZ and OLIVIA
ENRIQUEZ,

12

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

Plaintiffs,
13
14
15

v.
BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., et al.,
Defendants.
/

16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25

The parties having advised the Court that they have agreed to a settlement of this
cause, and the settlement having been placed on the record,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiffs’ claims alleged against defendants herein
be dismissed without prejudice; provided, however, that if any party hereto shall certify to
this Court, within ninety (90) days, with proof of service of a copy thereof on the opposing
party, that the agreed consideration for the settlement has not been delivered, the
foregoing order shall stand vacated and the action shall forthwith be restored to the
calendar for further proceedings as appropriate.
IT IS SO ORDERED.

26
27
28

Dated: December 15, 2015
MAXINE M. CHESNEY
United States District Judge