Costco Wholesale Corporation v. Johnson & Johnson Vision Care Inc
Filing
41
ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. RELATING CASES (RE 10 ; 11 ; 21 ; 23 ; 37 ; 39 ). (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/20/2015)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
7
COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATION,
Case No. 15-cv-00941-HSG
Plaintiff,
8
ORDER RELATING CASES
v.
Re: Dkt. Nos. 10, 11, 21, 23, 37, 39
9
10
JOHNSON & JOHNSON VISION CARE
INC,
Defendant.
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
Before the Court are six administrative motions to consider whether eleven cases filed in
13
14
this District are related to the above-captioned matter. Defendant Johnson & Johnson Vision Care
15
Inc. filed a Response stating that it has “no objection” to treating these actions as related. Dkt. No.
16
34.
17
The Court finds that all twelve of the actions “concern substantially the same parties,
18
property, transaction, or event,” and that “[i]t appears likely that there will be an unduly
19
burdensome duplication of labor and expense or conflicting results if the cases are conducted
20
before different Judges.” Civ. L.R. 3-12(a). Accordingly, the Court determines that the following
21
cases are related to 3:15-cv-00941-HSG and reassigns them to the undersigned for all future
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
proceedings:
3:15-cv-01001-JCS
3:15-cv-01028-EDL
3:15-cv-01045-JSC
5:15-cv-01064-EJD
3:15-cv-01095-EDL
3:15-cv-01092-JCS
1
4:15-cv-01090-DMR
2
3:15-cv-01097-MEJ
3
5:15-cv-01093-BLF
4
3:15-cv-01123-EDL
5
3:15-cv-01124-JCS
6
The parties are instructed that any future filings in the reassigned cases are to bear the
7
initials of the undersigned immediately after the case number. The case management conferences
8
in the reassigned cases will be rescheduled by the Court. The parties shall adjust the dates for the
9
conference, disclosures and report required by Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 16 and 26
accordingly. Unless otherwise ordered, any noticed dates for motion hearings are vacated and
11
United States District Court
Northern District of California
10
must be re-noticed by the moving party before the undersigned. Any deadlines set by the ADR
12
Local Rules remain in effect.
13
14
15
16
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: March 20, 2015
______________________________________
HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR.
United States District Judge
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?