Costco Wholesale Corporation v. Johnson & Johnson Vision Care Inc

Filing 41

ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. RELATING CASES (RE 10 ; 11 ; 21 ; 23 ; 37 ; 39 ). (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/20/2015)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATION, Case No. 15-cv-00941-HSG Plaintiff, 8 ORDER RELATING CASES v. Re: Dkt. Nos. 10, 11, 21, 23, 37, 39 9 10 JOHNSON & JOHNSON VISION CARE INC, Defendant. United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 Before the Court are six administrative motions to consider whether eleven cases filed in 13 14 this District are related to the above-captioned matter. Defendant Johnson & Johnson Vision Care 15 Inc. filed a Response stating that it has “no objection” to treating these actions as related. Dkt. No. 16 34. 17 The Court finds that all twelve of the actions “concern substantially the same parties, 18 property, transaction, or event,” and that “[i]t appears likely that there will be an unduly 19 burdensome duplication of labor and expense or conflicting results if the cases are conducted 20 before different Judges.” Civ. L.R. 3-12(a). Accordingly, the Court determines that the following 21 cases are related to 3:15-cv-00941-HSG and reassigns them to the undersigned for all future 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 proceedings:  3:15-cv-01001-JCS  3:15-cv-01028-EDL  3:15-cv-01045-JSC  5:15-cv-01064-EJD  3:15-cv-01095-EDL  3:15-cv-01092-JCS 1  4:15-cv-01090-DMR 2  3:15-cv-01097-MEJ 3  5:15-cv-01093-BLF 4  3:15-cv-01123-EDL 5  3:15-cv-01124-JCS 6 The parties are instructed that any future filings in the reassigned cases are to bear the 7 initials of the undersigned immediately after the case number. The case management conferences 8 in the reassigned cases will be rescheduled by the Court. The parties shall adjust the dates for the 9 conference, disclosures and report required by Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 16 and 26 accordingly. Unless otherwise ordered, any noticed dates for motion hearings are vacated and 11 United States District Court Northern District of California 10 must be re-noticed by the moving party before the undersigned. Any deadlines set by the ADR 12 Local Rules remain in effect. 13 14 15 16 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: March 20, 2015 ______________________________________ HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR. United States District Judge 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?